Comments on: Judge Busch Denies City’s Request to Remove Market/Octavia Bike Plan http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/01/22/judge-busch-denies-citys-request-to-remove-marketoctavia-bike-plan/ Covering San Francisco's livable streets movement Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:16:10 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: dustin http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/01/22/judge-busch-denies-citys-request-to-remove-marketoctavia-bike-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3278 dustin Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:27:02 +0000 http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1350#comment-3278 mattymatt, public comment period on the draft EIR closed on 1/13/09. the city now must respond to all comments received and publish a response to comments document before the planning commission can certify the EIR. mattymatt,

public comment period on the draft EIR closed on 1/13/09. the city now must respond to all comments received and publish a response to comments document before the planning commission can certify the EIR.

]]> By: mattymatt http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/01/22/judge-busch-denies-citys-request-to-remove-marketoctavia-bike-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3265 mattymatt Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:37:44 +0000 http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1350#comment-3265 Speaking of the EIR, what's the holdup now? <a href="http://sf.bikeblogs.org/the-eir" rel="nofollow">According to the SFBC</a>, we've gone 947 days with no new bike lanes. WTF? How are we still waiting for work to resume? Speaking of the EIR, what's the holdup now? According to the SFBC, we've gone 947 days with no new bike lanes. WTF? How are we still waiting for work to resume?

]]> By: murphstahoe http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/01/22/judge-busch-denies-citys-request-to-remove-marketoctavia-bike-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3264 murphstahoe Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:31:57 +0000 http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1350#comment-3264 Why in the world did he deny the bike racks? Is he just sending a message that he wants them to just get the EIR done so we can build out everything? Putting those bike racks in has much positive value and the only negative value is that they will cost a couple hundred dollars to buy and install, far less than the expected loss of the current hazardous conditions outside Dolores Park Cafe. Why in the world did he deny the bike racks? Is he just sending a message that he wants them to just get the EIR done so we can build out everything?

Putting those bike racks in has much positive value and the only negative value is that they will cost a couple hundred dollars to buy and install, far less than the expected loss of the current hazardous conditions outside Dolores Park Cafe.

]]>