Caltrain to Present Plan to Increase Bicycle Capacity

410463785_35df8a4b07.jpg

Caltrain claims it "values bicycle commuters." In its goals and objectives the agency says "Caltrain must be a competitive alternative to traveling by automobile." That goal will be tested tomorrow when the agency presents its final plan to increase bicycle capacity on Caltrain to the Board of Directors. Advocates are frustrated it isn’t being made public before it’s presented and voted on.

"The final proposal isn’t going to go to anybody until it goes to our board," said Mark Simon, special assistant to the Caltrain CEO. He said staff was still working on the plan as late as last night but confirmed "it will significantly increase bike capacity on Caltrain."

The number of bicycle commuters on Caltrain has soared recently and there’s not enough bicycle capacity on trains so lots of bicyclists are getting bumped. Some have to wait as long as an hour for the next train — making them late for work — and those who defy the rules are dealt with forcibly.

The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition has come up with an extensive plan to improve bicycle capacity without impacting passengers. Part of Caltrain’s apparent resistance to adding more space for bikes is the argument that more bicycles will get in the way of passengers. But take a look at the photos below.

no space for bikes_1.jpgAdvocates did a photo test that found while bicycle capacity was at its max, causing bicyclists to get bumped, many passenger-only cars were empty, not a rider to be seen.

Caltrain’s bicycle capacity is random depending on which train you get; if you’re lucky you’ll get two bike cars. Bike cars on older trains have a capacity for 32 bicycles while the cars on newer trains carry only 16. And because Caltrain is replacing its older trains, capacity has actually been decreasing just when the need is increasing. The SFBC would like to see all trains make room for a maximum of 80 bikes on two adjacent bike cars. The current set up sometimes finds one bike car at least three cars away from the other. 

As a result of the diminished capacity and because so many cyclists are getting bumped some are now refusing to ride Caltrain.

"They can’t afford to be late anymore. They can’t afford to miss meetings anymore. They can’t afford to miss clients anymore," said Shirley Johnson, a bicycle-commuting engineer who lives in San Francisco and takes Caltrain to San Mateo every day. She is leading the SFBC’s BIKES ONboard project.

"There are a lot of people who don’t own cars. And we can do so because of Caltrain. Caltrain made it possible," said Johnson. "So we’re very grateful to Caltrain and we want to make it possible for more people."

2763618691_aec799e12a_1.jpg

Johnson is outraged by the Caltrain staff’s apparent refusal to work with the SFBC or send over its proposal, especially considering it’s listed as an action item on Thursday’s agenda. The public will not have any time to review or comment on the plan before it’s adopted.

"It’s not a secret plan and we haven’t been secret about it. We’ve been very forthcoming," said Simon. "We’ve been discussing with them in considerable detail what we can and can’t do."

Simon said he met numerous times with the SFBC and the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition.

The agency’s staff did apparently spend time counting bicycle commuters on Caltrain, but Johnson doesn’t think they took into account bumped bicyclists and latent demand, nor the riders who have stopped riding because of overcrowded bike cars.

"I saw the guy with the clipboard on a day that I got bumped and he didn’t count me," she said.

Johnson is also concerned that staff has formulated a plan that inadvertently encourages bike theft. In an email to advocates this morning, Johnson warned of a scenario in which all center seats would be removed from the Bombardier bike cars.

Cyclists would either have to stand their entire trip to guard their bikes or sit out of site of their bikes, something we call “Stand or Steal.” Caltrain frames the issue as “Would you rather stand on the train, or stand on the platform?” But those are not the only choices. Caltrain can do better than that for its most loyal customers, without sacrificing security or passenger comfort. Ideally we would like one seat for one bike the way it is today, so all five Bombardier cars would need to be bike cars to achieve 80 bikes per train. Caltrain staff was resistant to that idea, so we proposed a compromise of one seat for two bikes, two bike cars, and bikes on the mezzanines (http://www.sfbike.org/caltrain_bob_propose). Carrying your bike to the mezzanine is about the same as carrying your bike onto a gallery car – not ideal, but workable.

Johnson plans to show up with a group of bicycle commuters at tomorrow’s board meeting to testify. They’ll be wearing bright pink stickers that say "More Bikes, No Bumps."

WHAT:    Caltrain Board of Directors Meeting

WHEN:   Thursday, February 5th, at 10am

WHERE: 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos

Email Mark Simon: simonm@samtrans.com

Flickr photos: joshua of california, executive education and SFBC.

  • In theory I am leading a ride from 4th/King Caltrain at 7 AM tomorrow, meeting at Warm Planet. We’ll take a nominally flat route to San Carlos, no rider left behind.

    That said, hopefully it rains tomorrow, in which case I’ll still be there but take the train down.

    http://holierthanyou.blogspot.com/2009/01/bike-to-caltrain-jpb-meeting-day.html

  • pat giorni

    I will be leaving my front door in B’game at 8am and look forward to meeting up with your entourage along the way. I am afraid I never use the train to those monthly JPB meetings because I can’t afford to bumped as that would mean missing the all important 1 minute Public Comment at the top of the agenda! If you should happen to be aboard, wave as you go by me as I dodge the deluge.

  • Final Tally – Caltrain will immediately begin ordering racks to increase Bombardier cars to 24 bike spaces and gallery cars to 40 spaces. The bike car will stay as the cab car, so 2 bike car consists will have 48 or 80 slots. This will still be “random” but Chuck Harvey said Caltrain will “try” to schedule them for peak cars.

    The initial proposal was actually for more capacity – 32 on the bombs but the cyclist in attendance all protested that this produces a disincentive to take your bike on board as it presents a theft risk. The push was for the board to review the proposal first. Scanlon gets major props for responding that this would serve as a delay so why don’t we order the racks, put the racks in the gallery cars as specified, put one set of racks into the bombs leaving 11 seats but expanding capacity, then see if we can resolve the theft issue.

    Personally I was very happy with the result. If you look back a year and recall that Caltrain was insisting there would be NO additional capacity, it shows that perserverance, organization, and hard work can get things through even a public sector organization.

  • Caltrain has installed 2 extra racks on one gallery car. The prevailing wisdom is that they are trying it out to see how it works – wisdom based in part on an email discussion with Mark Simon.

    The story is that the rack is very short – shorter than the other racks – and as such is problematic to rack your bikes to it.

    But this train is like a “Great White Whale” – you’ve heard it exists but never saw it yourself nor do you have any proof. Would it be that hard for Caltrain to notify the major passenger stakeholders and arrange a time for us to look at it? Perhaps even look at the rack before money was spent to install it and save Caltrain a few bucks? They certainly know how to get a hold of the SFBC and SVBC.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Longer Trains May Be No Match for Growing Caltrain Crowds

|
Caltrain’s rush hour trains have never been more crowded, which isn’t just uncomfortable for riders — it also discourages potential commuters who instead drive along Peninsula highways, and makes rides more difficult for elderly passengers and riders with disabilities. Commuters could see some relief in 2015, when Caltrain plans to extend the length of some of […]

Caltrain to Update Its Plan to Increase Bike Capacity

|
Johnson isn’t fond of the shorter bike racks on Caltrain. It’s been one month since the Caltrain Board of Directors approved a plan to increase bicycle capacity on its trains, a move advocates welcomed but felt didn’t go far enough because it won’t entirely prevent bicyclists from getting bumped. Tomorrow, the Caltrain board is expected […]

Design of High-Speed Trains Threatens to Diminish Caltrain Capacity

|
The insistence of California High Speed Rail officials on running trains with floors 50 inches above the tracks threatens to reduce the capacity of Caltrain and hamper the benefits of level boarding for the commuter rail agency. Last Tuesday, Caltrain officials gave an update on the electric trains the agency plans to purchase next year, which will […]

Advocates say Bicycle Riders Could Save Caltrain from Service Cuts

|
Photo: sfbike With Caltrain facing a $2.3 million deficit, and its governing board considering service cuts and fare hikes, bicycle advocates from three Bay Area counties who have been leading the call for more bicycle capacity have calculated that the commuter rail line could stave off reductions if it would just accommodate the increasing demand […]

Caltrain Will Boost Bicycle Capacity But It’s Still Not Enough

|
Although capacity is increasing, bicyclists will continue to get left behind at Caltrain stations. Caltrain’s Board of Directors has approved a plan to improve bicycle capacity that is a step beyond staff’s recommendations but will it be enough to keep bicycle commuters from getting bumped? No. Still, advocates were pleased with yesterday’s decision to increase […]