- Streetsblog San Francisco - http://sf.streetsblog.org -
The Myth of the Urban Driving Shoppers
Posted By Matthew Roth On February 20, 2009 @ 5:56 pm In Bicycling,Development,Economics,Pedestrian Infrastructure,Quality of Life,SFCTA,Toronto,Transportation Policy,Urban Design,Urban Planning,Walking | 25 Comments
Because the health of small businesses is a political holy grail locally and nationally, those merchants who believe they will lose parking because of sidewalk widening, BRT, bicycle lanes, or greening, will stand up at meetings and lobby local elected officials to kill the projects, and they are usually successful. Though it often goes counter to their personal interests, the assumptions associated with automobility and commerce are so deeply enmeshed that dense urban communities don't thrive as much as they could if more space were given to improving the quality of the pedestrian public realm.
But time and again, shopper intercept studies show this is not the
case, that transit riders and pedestrians spend more in commercial districts than drivers.
In New York City, a study of pedestrian space  on Prince Street in Soho found that 89 percent of the people who use Prince Street are arriving by subway, bus, walking or bicycle (PDF ). Only 9 percent arrive by car. By a ratio of 5:1 shoppers said they would come to Prince Street more often if they had more space to walk, even if it meant eliminating parking spaces. The study also found shoppers who value wider sidewalks over parking spent about five times as much money, in aggregate, compared to those who value parking over sidewalks.
But that's New York City, not San Francisco, so it couldn't be the same here, could it? In 2008, the TA found  that motorists only accounted for 14 percent of all users accessing the Columbus Avenue shopping district (PDF ). Those motorists spent one fifth of the the total of all other modes and visited half as often or less than the other mode users. Those drivers were typically not from San Francisco and were driving as part of groups or because they didn't have convenient transit options.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation's Main Street program  has realized tremendous success promoting investment in street amenities along traditional business districts in towns to promote commercial vitality. In 2007 alone, the Trust reported the following:
Clearly if San Francisco were responding to evidence and not errant assumptions, it would adopt an economic stimulus plan based on sidewalk expansion and bicycle lanes. Too bad the latter are still illegal.
Flickr photo: Snap Man 
Article printed from Streetsblog San Francisco: http://sf.streetsblog.org
URL to article: http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/20/the-myth-of-the-urban-driving-shoppers/
URLs in this post:
 about Jefferson Street: http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/18/planning-department-unveils-san-franciscos-first-pedestrian-priority-street/
 a study of pedestrian space: http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/12/14/rethinking-soho/
 PDF: http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-content/upload1/soho_curbing_cars.pdf
 the TA found: http://www.sfcta.org/content/view/380/206/
 PDF: http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-content/upload1/columbusavesurveyfindings1.pdf
 PDF: http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-content/upload1/Ec019_i5.pdf
 recent study found: http://spacing.ca/wire/2009/02/18/study-finds-that-removing-parking-to-install-bike-lanes-or-widen-sidewalk-would-benefit-businesses-on-bloor/
 PDF: http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-content/upload1/bikelanesparking.pdf
 Main Street program: http://www.mainstreet.org/content.aspx?page=1&site=1
 Snap Man: http://flickr.com/photos/kkanouse/2984792669/
Copyright © 2008 Streetsblog. All rights reserved.