<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MTA Begins Its First Automated Count of Bicyclists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Miguel</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-55281</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-55281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an everyday cyclist.  I go past that area pretty much 7 days/week, but I generally avoid the Fell St lanes as getting doored here would dump you into 40 mph traffic.  I take Hayes instead.

I&#039;m not looking for encouragement or condemnation on the risk/reward of Fell st lanes ;)  But, I think this type of situation presents an additional dilemma with the data collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an everyday cyclist.  I go past that area pretty much 7 days/week, but I generally avoid the Fell St lanes as getting doored here would dump you into 40 mph traffic.  I take Hayes instead.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not looking for encouragement or condemnation on the risk/reward of Fell st lanes <img src='http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   But, I think this type of situation presents an additional dilemma with the data collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3873</guid>
		<description>I rode by this yesterday at 5 pm. One small problem. The cars waiting to get in to the gas station at Divisadero and Fell are backed up so far that they are blocking this section of the bike lane. So those of us on bikes are swerving around into the adjacent lane, far from the counter. Given that drivers are constantly lining up to get gas here, particularly during rush hour, I suspect that the counter is missing a lot of bike trips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rode by this yesterday at 5 pm. One small problem. The cars waiting to get in to the gas station at Divisadero and Fell are backed up so far that they are blocking this section of the bike lane. So those of us on bikes are swerving around into the adjacent lane, far from the counter. Given that drivers are constantly lining up to get gas here, particularly during rush hour, I suspect that the counter is missing a lot of bike trips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphstahoe</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>murphstahoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>marcos - there are sure to be funding problems for the bike plan and prioritization will occur. A lot of that could come in the form of delaying the pieces that the neighbors whine about. But it&#039;s pretty easy to see which projects have the most oomph.

My vote for #1 - and it&#039;s not even close. Townsend St.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marcos &#8211; there are sure to be funding problems for the bike plan and prioritization will occur. A lot of that could come in the form of delaying the pieces that the neighbors whine about. But it&#8217;s pretty easy to see which projects have the most oomph.</p>
<p>My vote for #1 &#8211; and it&#8217;s not even close. Townsend St.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jass</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator>jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3861</guid>
		<description>This is the same technology that lets traffic lights detect a bicycle waiting for a green yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the same technology that lets traffic lights detect a bicycle waiting for a green yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcos</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3854</link>
		<dc:creator>marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3854</guid>
		<description>CBrinkman wrote: &quot;how do we count the missing cyclists? The ones who would cycle if they felt safe?&quot;

We count them once policies are put into place that make it safer to cycle and they do.

One potential problem with the count is that if the numbers come in low, that gives the anti-bike people like Rob Anderson a toehold to challenge the level of funding for bike facilities.  That almost puts the civil rights of cyclists up for a referendum based on usage.

The question is also one of prioritizing scarce resources.  I&#039;d rather see the Bicycle Program tell us how they&#039;re going to proceed at implementing the policies in the Bicycle Plan that promote safety and convenience rather than instrumenting a few bike lanes and implementing some of the more spurious segments in the 1997 bike network.

-marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBrinkman wrote: &#8220;how do we count the missing cyclists? The ones who would cycle if they felt safe?&#8221;</p>
<p>We count them once policies are put into place that make it safer to cycle and they do.</p>
<p>One potential problem with the count is that if the numbers come in low, that gives the anti-bike people like Rob Anderson a toehold to challenge the level of funding for bike facilities.  That almost puts the civil rights of cyclists up for a referendum based on usage.</p>
<p>The question is also one of prioritizing scarce resources.  I&#8217;d rather see the Bicycle Program tell us how they&#8217;re going to proceed at implementing the policies in the Bicycle Plan that promote safety and convenience rather than instrumenting a few bike lanes and implementing some of the more spurious segments in the 1997 bike network.</p>
<p>-marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBrinkman</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>CBrinkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to know the numbers, even if the counts aren&#039;t perfect the first time, or first few times - three cheers to the Bike Program for starting the process of counting. We already know that Market Street had more cyclists then private autos during the rush hours, it will be great to have numbers for other streets as well.  Now - how do we count the missing cyclists?  The ones who would cycle if they felt safe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to know the numbers, even if the counts aren&#8217;t perfect the first time, or first few times &#8211; three cheers to the Bike Program for starting the process of counting. We already know that Market Street had more cyclists then private autos during the rush hours, it will be great to have numbers for other streets as well.  Now &#8211; how do we count the missing cyclists?  The ones who would cycle if they felt safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcos</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>Most streets do not have bike lanes.  

Most bike lanes will never have sensors.

Most bike trips will take place either off the bike lane network or on bike lanes without sensors.

What&#039;s the math behind taking a specialized subset of a specialized subset and then making broad generalizations from that?

-marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most streets do not have bike lanes.  </p>
<p>Most bike lanes will never have sensors.</p>
<p>Most bike trips will take place either off the bike lane network or on bike lanes without sensors.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the math behind taking a specialized subset of a specialized subset and then making broad generalizations from that?</p>
<p>-marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Goebel</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Goebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification JF that it does pick up aluminum and alloy rims, which I&#039;ve corrected in the story. It does not pick up carbon fiber wheels. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification JF that it does pick up aluminum and alloy rims, which I&#8217;ve corrected in the story. It does not pick up carbon fiber wheels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF Rheault</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>JF Rheault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>@ Jeffrey W. Baker

Yes, aluminum is fine for detection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jeffrey W. Baker</p>
<p>Yes, aluminum is fine for detection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey W. Baker</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey W. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>If the explanation of the operating principle is correct, this seems like it wouldn&#039;t work.  Most bike wheels (and many entire bikes) contain little or no ferrous metals.  Can&#039;t these loops detect -any- conductive metal (e.g. aluminum)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the explanation of the operating principle is correct, this seems like it wouldn&#8217;t work.  Most bike wheels (and many entire bikes) contain little or no ferrous metals.  Can&#8217;t these loops detect -any- conductive metal (e.g. aluminum)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphstahoe</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>murphstahoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>And in fact the settings should not be designed to &quot;not&quot; detect cars - they should be designed to *differentiate* between cars and bikes - in order to assess the magnitude of the problem of cars driving in and parking in the bike lanes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in fact the settings should not be designed to &#8220;not&#8221; detect cars &#8211; they should be designed to *differentiate* between cars and bikes &#8211; in order to assess the magnitude of the problem of cars driving in and parking in the bike lanes <img src='http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphstahoe</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>murphstahoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>This provides an excellent opportunity for warring sides to cook the books. The cyclists can organize group rides that navigate the loop detectors, the anti-cyclists can just double park on top of the loop detector!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This provides an excellent opportunity for warring sides to cook the books. The cyclists can organize group rides that navigate the loop detectors, the anti-cyclists can just double park on top of the loop detector!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanthe Asher</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Xanthe Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>This counting system is great and will lead to better bicycle lanes as well as become a tool to measure riders usage which is leverage for increased  funding opportunities for bicycle related development projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This counting system is great and will lead to better bicycle lanes as well as become a tool to measure riders usage which is leverage for increased  funding opportunities for bicycle related development projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rzu</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/02/25/mta-begins-its-first-automated-count-of-bicyclists/comment-page-1/#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>rzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1606#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>I noticed the loop detectors in the bike lane just the other day. It would be great to have this kind of data for bike lanes all around the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the loop detectors in the bike lane just the other day. It would be great to have this kind of data for bike lanes all around the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

