<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Senator Takes on Parking Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/03/03/state-senator-takes-on-parking-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/03/03/state-senator-takes-on-parking-requirements/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bike Man Dan</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/03/03/state-senator-takes-on-parking-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-128741</link>
		<dc:creator>Bike Man Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1663#comment-128741</guid>
		<description>But where will they park their Priuseseses (or Prii?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But where will they park their Priuseseses (or Prii?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Siegel</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/03/03/state-senator-takes-on-parking-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1663#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>I was going to make exactly the same comment that Greg made above.  Don&#039;t wait for the state to mandate it.  Individual cities can take the lead by doing it themselves.  

We have to expect that some progressive individual cities will be quicker to do these things than the state as a whole.  

However, in &quot;progressive&quot; Berkeley, the NIMBYs would go insane if someone introduced a bill eliminating the minimum parking requirement (those who are not insane already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to make exactly the same comment that Greg made above.  Don&#8217;t wait for the state to mandate it.  Individual cities can take the lead by doing it themselves.  </p>
<p>We have to expect that some progressive individual cities will be quicker to do these things than the state as a whole.  </p>
<p>However, in &#8220;progressive&#8221; Berkeley, the NIMBYs would go insane if someone introduced a bill eliminating the minimum parking requirement (those who are not insane already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Riessen</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/03/03/state-senator-takes-on-parking-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-3941</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Riessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1663#comment-3941</guid>
		<description>While this is a great idea, San Francisco does not need to wait for the state to mandate such a system.  SF should abolish all parking minimums right now.  Forcing developers to construct off-street parking substantially increases the cost of housing, and as we know, adding off-street parking does not increase overall parking supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this is a great idea, San Francisco does not need to wait for the state to mandate such a system.  SF should abolish all parking minimums right now.  Forcing developers to construct off-street parking substantially increases the cost of housing, and as we know, adding off-street parking does not increase overall parking supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

