Despite Setback, Advocates Claim Partial Win in MTC Discrimination Suit

574025995_bb076a371f.jpgSeventy eight percent of AC Transit riders are people of color. Flickr photo: jlnriang

In 2005, with frustration and anger mounting over service cuts and fare hikes for AC Transit riders, who are mostly people of color, a coalition of riders, labor and environmental justice advocates filed a federal class-action lawsuit against the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), accusing the agency of racial discrimination in the way it doles out transit funding. It claimed the MTC has a long history of channeling funding to mostly white riders on Caltrain and BART at the expense of AC Transit bus riders of color.

Although a San Francisco federal judge sided with the MTC last week, advocates point out that the ruling (PDF) noted the "disparate impact" AC Transit riders have endured because of the MTC’s strategic long-range plan for transit expansion projects, or Resolution 3434:

MTC allocates more funding to rail projects than to bus projects, resulting in bus projects proposed by AC Transit being excluded from projects listed in Resolution 3434.  Although Plaintiffs’ challenge to MTC’s initial decisions on which projects to include under Resolution 3434 appear to be barred by the statute of limitations, those decisions constitute relevant context for MTC’s further reductions in 2006 of the scope of the few AC Transit bus projects that had initially been included. 

“The court acknowledged that our lawsuit may have already
pressured MTC to channel more funds to AC Transit," said Guillermo Mayer,
staff attorney at Public Advocates. “We’re confident that momentum is
building in the fight for transit fairness and equality.”

The suit named as the plaintiffs bus riders Sylvia Darensburg of East Oakland, Vivian Hain of Berkeley and
Virginia Martinez of Richmond, along with Communities for a Better Environment and the
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192. They were represented by Public Advocates and two local law firms.

“For years MTC told us bus riders don’t matter as much as train
riders. The judge said we do matter. MTC can and should be doing a
lot more to support AC Transit bus riders," said Darensburg, a working mother and student who has spent up to five hours a day riding public transit.

In her ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Elizabeth Laporte said she sympathizes with the plaintiffs "who have experienced declines in bus services on which they depend to meet their basic needs." She wrote the "MTC could do somewhat more to benefit AC Transit’s minority riders through bus expansion projects" but "the MTC has met its burden of showing a substantial legitimate justification for the challenged funding practices."

She also wrote that when looking at the data from the viewpoint of absolute numbers of riders advantaged or disadvantaged by MTC’s funding policies the picture becomes more complicated than the plaintiffs portrayed it:

Plaintiffs’ main complaint is that MTC facilitates expansion of costly capital-intensive rail and light rail, especially by BART, instead of channeling more funds to bus service, especially by AC Transit.  Yet in FY 2005-06, BART carried a significantly higher total number of passengers, over 101 million, so with a minority percentage of 53-percent, its total minority passengers were over 53 million. By contrast, in FY 2005-06, AC Transit carried only 65 million passengers (approximately one-third less), and at 78-percent minority, the total number of AC Transit’s minority passengers was approximately 51 million, or 2 million fewer.

The lawyers who filed the suit on behalf of the AC Transit riders are considering an appeal.

  • mcas

    National Transit Database, 1989-2003:

    Per-Rider Subsidies:
    AC Transit: $2.78
    BART: $6.14
    CalTrain: $13.79

    Percentage of White Riders:
    AC Transit: 20.6%
    BART: 43.3%
    CalTrain: 60.0%

    ..coincidence?

    http://urbanhabitat.org/files/MTC-Where%20Are%20Our%20Buses12.20.pdf

  • Adam

    The comparison is misleading.

    For example, MTC funds 26 different transit agencies in the bay area, not just BART, Caltrain, and ACTransit. Golden Gate Transit–North Bay bus service provider–has by far the highest percentage of white riders of any bay area transit provider, yet faced greater hardship under MTC’s funding programs (greater service cuts and rate hikes) than AC Transit.

    Also, although BART has a lower percentage of minority riders than AC Transit, it actually serves a much larger number of minorities than AC Transit.

    Finally, much of the funding that MTC provides gets directed to rail projects because the state and federal legislation states a preference for rail line development. This in turn is motivated by the desire to build sustainable, transit-oriented housing developments which cannot be built around bus lines that, unlike rail, change over time and still take up space on roads, emit carbon, etc..

    I suspect we could accomplish more by working together to improve funding for public transportation, rather than pointing fingers.

  • Wendy Alfsen

    Apples were compared to oranges when BART was compared to AC Transit instead of comparing BART to all bus transit (totalled together) in BART’s service area. When BART totals are compared to the totals of ACT, Muni, CCTransit, SMTA, then the discrimination of $ vs passenger #s and communities of color would be clearer and the comparisons meaningful.

    ACT can not generate an equivalent # of passengers when it can only serve only a portion of the geographical area serviced by BART

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Advocates File Appeal in MTC Discrimination Case

|
Transit justice advocates at a 2004 rally nine months before the suit was filed. Photo by Public Advocates Inc. Nearly a month after a San Francisco federal judge ruled against a discrimination lawsuit against the MTC on behalf of AC Transit riders of color, attorneys representing a broad coalition of riders, labor and environmental justice […]

FTA Probes MTC Civil Rights Policy, Casts Shadow on Funding Practices

|
MTC’s Executive Director Steve Heminger, foreground, listens to public testimony against MTC’s plan to use federal stimulus funds for the Oakland Airport Connector last year. Photo: Matthew Roth The Federal Transit Administration has increased the likelihood the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the Bay Area’s regional transportation planning and funding body, will undergo a full civil […]

Federal Civil Rights Review Raises Governance Questions at MTC

|
The long-term impacts to transportation funding as a result of the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) civil rights compliance probe of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) won’t be clear for some time, but the action by the federal administration has transportation policy circles buzzing. Experts in civil rights and regional planning policy couldn’t point to another […]