<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BART Board Will Consider Increased Parking Fees to Address Budget Woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/04/09/bart-board-will-consider-increased-parking-fees-to-address-budget-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/04/09/bart-board-will-consider-increased-parking-fees-to-address-budget-woes/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: icarus12</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/04/09/bart-board-will-consider-increased-parking-fees-to-address-budget-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-490064</link>
		<dc:creator>icarus12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 04:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1910#comment-490064</guid>
		<description>Just traveled by West Oakland Bart.  The parking fee there is $5 per day, Monday-Friday, 4 am - 3 pm.  Bart has a captive audience.  It could institute dynamic pricing so that a few parking spots were always available at every station for those willing to pay.  But if Bart did that, it should think about extending shuttle services or encouraging carpools to stations, so that many people would not be tempted to drive at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just traveled by West Oakland Bart.  The parking fee there is $5 per day, Monday-Friday, 4 am &#8211; 3 pm.  Bart has a captive audience.  It could institute dynamic pricing so that a few parking spots were always available at every station for those willing to pay.  But if Bart did that, it should think about extending shuttle services or encouraging carpools to stations, so that many people would not be tempted to drive at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Murphy</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/04/09/bart-board-will-consider-increased-parking-fees-to-address-budget-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>John Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1910#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>Only raising fares and not raising parking is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only raising fares and not raising parking is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcas</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/04/09/bart-board-will-consider-increased-parking-fees-to-address-budget-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-4668</link>
		<dc:creator>mcas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=1910#comment-4668</guid>
		<description>$1 a day parking is a joke-- BART has to pay good money on property taxes each year for all that pavement.  I certainly don&#039;t want to pay for a sea of cars near a transit hub- why aren&#039;t these car drivers paying for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$1 a day parking is a joke&#8211; BART has to pay good money on property taxes each year for all that pavement.  I certainly don&#8217;t want to pay for a sea of cars near a transit hub- why aren&#8217;t these car drivers paying for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

