California Cities Need A Predictable Fund For Transit Operations

train.jpgPhoto by George Donnelly, via Flickr

When the State Transit Assistance (STA) fund was zeroed out to pass the budget a couple of months ago, the already dire situation for transit operators in California became much worse.  In the Bay Area, AC Transit raised fares, the MTA has been considering budget cuts and fare hikes, and BART will likely do the same if its board can get to the discussion at the next meeting. 

While these temporary solutions will balance the spreadsheets for this year, the state’s commitment to transit operations for the next five years will be a pittance and operators will continue to suffer.  Unless advocates can get on the same page and build a comprehensive coalition to call for more funding, elected officials like Governor Schwarzenegger will get away with pitching themselves as green politicians and then sabotaging one of the best ways to make our mobility more sustainable.

Unfortunately, advocates are not unified in their call for a commitment to transit.  Several hundred people have turned out at meetings about funding cuts, but those same numbers have not made it to Sacramento to lobby legislators for an affirmative change. Some of the groups will be spending their resources lobbying Washington for changes to the transportation act rather than dealing with the troubled situation at the state level.

"For me, part of it will be where the biggest opportunities are for organizing. There is some possibility for major transitions at the federal level," said CALPIRG’s Emily Rusch, cautioning that transit constituency wasn’t strong enough at the state level. "It will take some time before we can find more money from legislators or at the ballot."

Despite President Obama’s apparent predilection for rail and some good rhetoric about the need to synchronize land use and transportation policy at a regional level, states are spending stimulus money on highway expansion.  Upending the status quo in Washington on transportation will be a monumental task. 

USDOT Secretary Ray LaHood said recently that the feds are in the business of funding capital and expansion projects, but not transit operations, which he characterized as a local issue.  Senator Barbara Boxer, who heads the Environment and Public Works Committee and will write the lion’s share of the transportation act, was reported to support an amendment to the stimulus package that would have given highways an additional $50 billion.  Even Boxer’s website is shameful, with Senator and global warming denier James Inhofe’s specious global warming rants occupying space alongside an apparent environmentalist California Democrat.

If Transportation for America and other transit and environmental groups cannot get the federal government to make a sea change in its formula funding, Sacramento will be one of the last hopes to prevent further fare increases and service cuts.

TransForm recently opened an office in Sacramento with the goal of developing a transit funding coalition, which at the time of this writing has nearly one hundred members.  It’s not clear how many of those groups signed on will do the heaving lifting when many of them have other issues that require general fund money.

Transform’s Nick Caston sees the elimination of the STA as a blessing in disguise, asserting, "One of the few advantages for getting zeroed out is that we can start from scratch to come up with a better model. The STA was always considered "spillover" funding. Our target is a sustainable and predictable form of transportation funding."

Caston said that Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg had discussed setting up a select committee or task force in the upper house to identify a new source of transit funding.

A Sacramento source close to the negotiations, however, said that a transit funding select committee wouldn’t get traction before the budget discussions this summer and even if it did afterward it would have trouble competing with other interests:

You can’t discuss this at the state level without discussing it in the context of the general fund.  We have a tremendous problem with the State General Fund.  That’s one of the issues the state transit advocates understand and have a hard time coming to terms with.  They’re going up against public employee unions, prison guards, SEIU, etc.

While it should make sense to legislators that they won’t meet the
obligations set out in the AB 32 global warming and SB 375 anti-sprawl
legislation recently passed if they continue to incentivize driving, none has come out in public linking transit funding to the state’s purported environmental objectives.  Those politicians who suggest they are "green" by supporting alternative fuel or electric vehicles, but don’t make a real commitment to transit are disingenuous at best.

"It’s impossible to address a green agenda without funding transit operations," said Caston.

  • Raise the Gas tax now! We should not be getting away with paying $2.20 a gallon for gas. Demand is inelastic and gas constitutes a small percentage of overall auto transportation costs.

  • But would a gas tax be considered a stable source of transit funding? As transit grows in popularity it would naturally erode its own means of support.

  • those dudes

    Unfortunately this post doesn’t offer anything that regular streetsblog readers don’t already know. Why not offer some suggested solutions that advocates could rally around?

  • I am curious how the Obama Administration arrives at the conclusion that funding transit operations is a local matter when climate change and emissions are not local matters and that dependence on foreign petroleum is not a local matter.

    The fact is that any solution is going to have to survive the political process, and that means identifying viable new sources of revenue or viable existing expenses that can be cut.

    They are not listening to us because we are not organizing numbers. There are captive audiences on transit vehicles that, if organized, could have transit advocacy compete with the labor unions for general fund attention.

    -marc

  • A couple of months ago, I took part in a Day of Action against Prop 8 in Sacramento. It was organised by the Human Rights Campaign and put us face-to-face with lawmakers.

    I’d love to see a similar Day of Action to support public transport in this state, and I’d happily take a day off to be part of it. Surely I’m not the only reader of this blog who feels that way! Hell, I’d jump at the chance to help organise it, if I can get help forom somebody a bit more experienced with this sort of thing.

  • I’d not look to the Human Rights Campaign nor California’s same sex marriage advocates for lessons on how play politics to win.

    Not only can we not get married, but queers throughout the heartland do not enjoy housing and employment protection even though the polling numbers have shown broad support for those life-critical rights over the past 15 years.

    Hmm, why does that sound familiar, significant public support on your side, inability to move your agenda….hmmm….

    -marc

  • @Jeffrey Baker –

    As transit grows in popularity, the political capability of transit advocates to get other sources of funding increases because the pool of voters who prioritize that funding grows. In theory anyway. The problem being that each additional voice from a rider is very soft compared to the voices of those who benefit from the status quo.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

California Transit Association: “Armageddon Scenario Has Arrived”

|
Transit advocates around the state are trying to grapple with the new reality that the budget compromise worked out between Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Legislature completely abolishes the State Transit Assistance (STA) and the $536 million that it dedicated to subsidizing transit operations. There are multiple villains in this story, but the blackest hat […]

Gov Signs Transit Funding Bills, Money Coming for Local Operators

|
Photo: hanneorla California transit operators are poised to receive a temporary infusion of $400 million in cash from the state for operating funds, a move that could defray immediate shortfalls and set up a steady stream of state money for the foreseeable future. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger ratified last night the laws (ABX8 6 and ABX8 […]

Advocates Want Oakland Airport Connector Funds for Transit Operations

|
Image: TransForm With the civil rights imbroglio between BART and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) making news last week, a problem that could imperil $70 million in federal stimulus funds obligated to the Oakland Airport Connector (OAC), advocates are calling on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to give the stimulus money to cash-strapped transit operators […]

Local Advocates Mourn “Death of Transit” as Part of National Campaign

|
Mock funeral for transit today in Oakland. Photos: Matthew Roth Transit advocates, transit riders, politicians, and religious figures mourned the continual underfunding of transit operations by staging a mock funeral for public transit above the 12th Street/Oakland BART station today. The event was tied to a national campaign led by Transit Riders for Public Transportation […]

Advocates Launch Effort to Restore State Transit Funding

|
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg has told advocates he wants to help find a state transit funding solution. California transit advocates have begun organizing a strategy to move legislation through Sacramento that would dedicate a steady, long-term state revenue source for public transit and prevent future budget writers from raiding it. "We need to […]