Supes Committee Votes to Recommend Rejection of MTA Budget

budget_finance_comm_photo.jpgSupervisor David Campos with BOS Prez David Chiu and Supervisor Bevan Dufty in background at yesterday’s Budget and Finance Committee meeting. Photos by Bryan Goebel.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee voted 4-1, with Supervisor Carmen Chu dissenting, to recommend the rejection of the MTA’s $778 million budget following a marathon meeting yesterday that featured some enrapturing political theater when BOS Prez David Chiu grilled MTA Chief Nat Ford.

The motion was amended to include a procedural step that allows a revised MTA budget (and a resolution to reject it) to go to the full Board of Supervisors Tuesday, or be tabled and brought back before the committee, a move meant to give the supervisors more leverage.

"I’ve asked them (MTA) to see if the staff can sharpen their pencils again and take another crack at this budget," said Chiu, who has been applauded by advocates for taking leadership on the MTA budget, which calls for unpopular fare hikes and service cuts to deal with a $129 million deficit. "Hopefully in the next couple of days we can see if there’s a budget that could be acceptable to us at the Board and if there is no headway in that conversation then we will be able to vote on this rejection motion."

The comments toward the end of a seven hour committee meeting followed an intense q-and-a session with Ford in which Chiu hammered home a series of questions intended to expose the MTA’s inefficiencies. He questioned Ford about MTA work orders, specifically from the San Francisco Police Department and 311, which are draining Muni’s budget.

Ford responded: "The MTA Board has requested that an audit be done in terms of these work orders but it’s my sense that we are paying for services that the MTA needs, the degree of which I think the audit will bear that out, and we can debate that, but I think that there are some services that are essential."

And on 311: "At this juncture we’re paying for something that we asked for, that we needed, and that we agreed to."

Chiu replied: "I appreciate that but I guess from my perspective if I had a $1.96 per call I would rather provide that to a Muni passenger to ride the bus for free, which I believe was something Mayor Newsom had proposed in 2007," a comment which elicited laughter and applause from the audience. 

nat_ford_before_committee.jpgMTA Chief Nat Ford answering questions from supervisors.

Ford could not speak to the MTA’s history of a $300,000 work order for police protection at city-owned garages. Chiu was concerned about a police department work order for free parking in the North Beach garage, which is in his district.

"I’m not famiiar with that arrangement," Ford replied.

"My understanding, also, is police officers are doing drive-bys of city garages so we can pay this money but it doesn’t strike me as a good way to spend money. I also understand that San Francisco Police Department cruisers, when they pass by private garages, when they pass by Macy’s, when they pass by other private property, that the owners of those properties are not charged a protection fee back to the MTA."

"I am unfamiliar with any arrangement of that nature. We are in the midst of negotiating an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) with SFPD, we do not have a finalized MOU at this point…but that is not part of an agreement that I’m aware of."

"It has been really befuddling that there has not yet been an understanding between the police department and the MTA as to how monies are spent," said Chiu, adding that there has been no accountability for the process.

Ford responded that he’s been in negotiations with the SPFD for a year, but Chiu asked, "Why has it taken a year?"

"Because it’s a very difficult negotiation that’s underway with the SFPD," Ford replied.

"If I could do anything to help I’d love to do that," said Chiu.

Chiu also asked Ford why a proposal for Sunday and evening parking enforcement was eliminated, and pressed him to explain what the cost ratio is in the budget for a Muni rider versus a car owner.

"I’ve heard from a lot of Muni passengers who actually feel like the balance of the hits on Muni passengers versus car owners isn’t exactly balanced," Chiu said.

CFO Sonali Bose explained the ratio was about 4 to 1: $22 million raised through fare hikes and only $3.85 million from parking revenue.  Ford said the parking enforcement items were taken off the table after public comment, and at the request of some supervisors and members of the MTA Board.

Supervisor David Campos also questioned Ford, and was concerned about how the fare hikes and service cuts would impact disadvantaged communities. Ford responded that a Title 6 review "will be completed before the service adjustments are made."

Campos responded, "I think it’s important that this Board, before we sanction or approve any budget that has this level of service cuts, has a full grasp and understanding how those cuts will affect the most disadvantaged people in our communities."

Supervisor Bevan Dufty, who voted in favor of the rejection motion, explained his wavering position against Sunday parking enforcement, saying, "I am personally needing to understand how my merchants perceive this." Dufty had planned to hold a meeting today with Castro merchants on the issue.

It now appears Ford will huddle with MTA staff and see what can be done to make the budget more agreeable to the Board of Supervisors, and lessen the impact of fare hikes and service cuts. Ford has the discretion to rejigger 5 percent of the total budget, or about $76 million. It doesn’t appear, at this point, the budget will go back to the MTA Board, unless fee increases are involved, which require public testimony.

Chiu now has what appears to be eight votes to reject the budget, including support from Dufty and Supervisor Sophie Maxwell.

Click here for a recap of yesterday’s meeting on Twitter. 

  • CBrinkman

    Can’t wait to watch the meeting on-line. Is this what leadership looks like?

    A ratio of 4 to 1. That really seems unfair. Especially when you consider what car drivers cost the city in crashes/smashes/ and injuries. And making our streets feel unsafe. And air pollution. And wear and tear on the asphalt. And noise pollution. Let’s all pay our fair share.

  • Where has this Chiu guy been all these years?

  • Pat

    Carmen Chu and Michelle Aliot-Pier are dumb as a box of rocks and need to bounce

  • Farebox fares would double since 2003 under the MTA budget proposal that seems dead in the water. As it stands, fares have risen 50% over that time from $1 to $1.5.

    What has been the rate of increase for various auto-related MTA fees over that interval?

    -marc

  • “Ford said the parking enforcement items were taken off the table after public comment, and at the request of some supervisors and members of the MTA Board.”

    Because fining car owners who park illegally is outrageous when you could instead penalize those who ride Muni. Transit first my ass.

  • Eric

    Nat Ford needs to go. The guy gets paid big bucks and offers nothing to us except new ways to waste our money (Culture Bus, anyone?) and taking credit for projects he had nothing to do with (i.e. Third St Rail.)

    It’s time to change the leadership.

  • John

    They could start by taking about 50% of Ford’s 300K salary

  • I think that Nat Ford is a talented transit administrator. The problem is that he sees himself as working for Gavin Newsom even though the Charter says different, empowering him to lead an independent agency.

    If there were any arguments to be made about this issue, they have been clearly resolved politically by the Board of Supervisors. Ford can either read the writing on the walls and run an independent agency with the mission of moving people around, or he can continue to view himself as a Mayoral employee and move money around on command.

    Ford has made some measurable improvements in Muni over the past few years in spite of Newsom’s meddling. Imagine what he could accomplish if he saw himself in partnership with the riders, Board of Supervisors, operators and even the Mayor on a mission to provide excellent transit service instead of serving as the Mayor’s political piggy bank?

    -marc

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

MTA Budget Facing Likely Rejection from Board of Supervisors

|
BOS Prez David Chiu is concerned fares would rise while service is cut. Photo by Bryan Goebel. Support appears to be growing at City Hall for Supervisor David Chiu’s motion to reject the MTA’s budget passed last Thursday. Very little has changed to satisfy Chiu, who remains deeply concerned about fare hikes, service cuts and […]

Can the Board of Supes Still Force a Better MTA Budget?

|
Budget and Finance Committee file photo by Bryan Goebel The Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee voted for a second time Wednesday to reject the MTA budget and send it back to the full Board. It followed a narrow vote by the full Board Tuesday to table BOS Prez David Chiu’s original rejection motion, […]

Board of Supes Votes Again Not to Reject MTA Budget

|
BOS Prez David Chiu, who voted not to reject: "It is time for us to move forward." Photo by Bryan Goebel. The Board of Supervisors, for the second time this month, voted 6-5 this afternoon against a motion to reject the MTA’s $778 million budget. BOS Prez David Chiu and Sophie Maxwell were among those […]

Supervisors Vote 6-5 Against Rejecting MTA Budget

|
BOS Prez David Chiu. Photo by Bryan Goebel BOS Prez David Chiu gave quite a performance at last week’s Budget and Finance Committee meeting, peppering MTA Chief Nat Ford with a series of hard-hitting questions about the agency’s unpopular budget, and lining up the six necessary votes to reject the spending plan. Yesterday, though, at […]

Supervisor Avalos, Advocates Call for More Equitable Muni Budget

|
Supervisor John Avalos at Transit Justice rally. Photos by Bryan Goebel. Supervisor John Avalos, leading the charge for a Muni budget that is more equitably balanced between drivers and transit riders, was joined Monday by a broad coalition of advocates, including groups representing seniors and youth, in a rally designed to pressure the MTA into […]