Congressional Climate Bill Includes ‘Complete Streets’ But Not CLEAN TEA

Henry Waxman (D-CA), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, has just struck a deal on his long-awaited climate change
bill — and though the agreement makes a number of concessions to polluters, it also takes a step forward towards popularizing the cause of "complete streets".

waxman.jpgHouse Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA). Photo: pbs.org.

The
House climate bill requires every state and metropolitan area with more
than 200,000 residents to devise plans for reducing
transportation-related carbon emissions. The bill directs states and
localities to draft plans that "consider transportation and land use
strategies" that encourage transit use, walking and bike riding, as
well as equal access by all users.

In short, the House climate bill officially sets "complete streets" principles
as planning goals for state and local transportation officials. The DOT
and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would enforce the
deadlines for each state and local transportation emissions-reduction
plan and hand out grants to help areas implement innovative strategies
for diminishing auto dependence.

The funding for those grants
would have to come from future spending bills, not from the auctions of
carbon-emissions permits to polluting industries — the so-called CLEAN TEA plan that Transportation for America and other advocacy groups have been hoping for.

Today’s
deal would auction only 15 percent of the emissions permits, giving the
rest away free to coal companies, electric utilities and the auto
industry. Why did CLEAN TEA fall by the wayside? Sadly, Democrats from
coal- and oil-dominant states were prepared to bring down Waxman’s bill
unless their hometown industries got emissions permits for free. Even
those Democrats who are still fighting to make polluting industries pay
for their permits want the revenue to go back to the public in the form
of tax credits, rather than to green transportation.

As Waxman’s climate bill takes flak
from environmentalists who (rightly) lament its giveaways to industry,
should the very presence of "complete streets" language in the bill be
considered a minor victory? Or is the climate deal just another example
of Congress kowtowing to Big Carbon?

  • Is there a phase out of the free permits? The NY Times reported a couple of days ago that they were talking about giving out some permits free initially, but phasing out all free permits in 10 to 15 years.

  • Richard Mott

    I understand they will be given away free for 20 years as the legislation now stands. Not good.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Oberstar’s New Transportation Bill: Get The Highlights

|
Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-MN), the House transportation committee chairman is set to brief reporters this afternoon on his $450 billion, six-year federal transportation bill — which he plans to pursue regardless of the Obama administration’s push for an 18-month extension of existing law. House Transportation Committee Chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) has a brewing battle with […]

White House Staying Quiet for Now on Transit’s Role in Climate Bill

|
Delivering his climate-change message to Congress yesterday, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood warned that fuel-efficiency advances secured by the Obama administration would not be enough to reduce emissions from transportation — not without encouraging Americans to drive less. Transportation Secretary LaHood said today he’ll weigh in later on climate-change money for transit. Photo: HillBuzz But when […]

STAA Tuned: Transpo Bill Leaves Funding Question Hanging

|
We now have in our hands the 775-page Surface Transportation Authorization Act, which was released yesterday by James Oberstar (D-MN), chairman of the House transportation committee. It is, in many ways, a remarkable bill — a blueprint for how transportation planning and infrastructure construction might undergo a significant shift away from the mindsets that have […]