House to Vote This Week on Weak ‘Cash for Clunkers’ Plan

The House is poised this week to take up the so-called "cash for
clunkers" bill, which aims to boost the slumping U.S. auto market by
giving out tax credits of $3,500 and up to anyone who trades in a
gas-guzzling car for a more efficient model.

fein.jpgSen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is backing a stronger version of "cash for clunkers". Photo: Out in Hollywood

The
plan was originally touted as environmentally friendly, given that it
would theoretically encourage the use of more fuel-efficient vehicles,
but it has long since morphed into a thinly disguised gift to the auto industry. The "cash for clunkers" deal
that the House will vote on, sponsored by Rep. Betty Sutton (D-OH),
offers money to truck drivers who improve their ride’s fuel economy by
as little as 1 mile per gallon.

The likely
passage of Sutton’s bill this week could be bad news for a stronger
"cash for clunkers" plan that’s being promoted by Sen. Dianne Feinstein
(D-CA), who displayed welcome candor
last month in calling the Sutton plan "the auto industry’s version" of
"cash for clunkers" and "unacceptable" to American drivers.

Feinstein’s
proposal would require drivers to achieve a 25 percent fuel-efficiency
increase before receiving a tax credit for ditching their clunkers. But
Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) is pushing for a trade-in tax credit that’s very similar to Sutton’s — truck owners would only have to increase their fuel efficiency by 2 miles per gallon to be eligible.

The requirements for car trade-ins aren’t much better under the Stabenow and Sutton plans, with a mere 4 mpg increase in fuel economy triggering the $3,500 tax credit.

If Sutton’s plan wins House approval this week, Stabenow’s Senate counterpart could potentially get a leg up over Feinstein’s.

Meanwhile, the larger question
of whether the whole idea of "cash for clunkers" makes sense is getting
much less attention than it should. The Obama administration continues
to support Sutton’s effort, despite the fact that it would give drivers
new incentive to buy trucks getting as little as 20 mpg. Doesn’t this
risk undercutting the president’s plan to force trucks to reach an average of 30 mpg and cars to reach 39 mpg by 2016?

  • I am not a wild fan of “cash for clunkers,” but a really important difference in Feinstein’s version is that the “cash” could be used towards transit instead of buying a new or used car. This is huge and worth fighting for. Here are the specifics from Feinstein’s website:

    “The bill specifies that during the first year of the program, vouchers will be issued for the following amounts:

    * For traded-in vehicles that are model year 2002 and later, drivers would receive a voucher for:
    o The purchase of a new vehicle: $4,500
    o The purchase of a used vehicle: $3,000
    o Transit fare credit: $3,000
    * For traded-in vehicles that are model year 1999 – 2001, drivers would receive a voucher for:
    o The purchase of a new vehicle: $3,000
    o The purchase of a used vehicle: $2,000
    o Transit fare credit: $2,000
    * For traded-in vehicles that are model year 1998 and earlier, drivers would receive a voucher for:
    o The purchase of a new vehicle: $2,000
    o The purchase of a used vehicle: $1,500
    o Transit fare credit: $1,500”

    So we could potentially get cars off the roads and turn people into transit riders. This is way, way, way better than the pathetic bill going down in the House. On this one, I think Feinstein deserves our full-throated support.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

House Quickly Sends $2 Billion More to ‘Cash for Clunkers’

|
The "cash for clunkers" rebate program, which promises new auto buyers up to $4,500 for fuel-efficiency upgrades as small as 2 miles per gallon, is back to life after burning through $1 billion in taxpayer cash. Minutes ago, the House approved $2 billion more in auto rebates by transferring cash that was already headed for […]

Separating Fact from Fiction on “Cash for Clunkers”

|
As debate rages on in the capital over whether to keep assisting the auto industry by giving out more "cash for clunkers" rebates, two assertions are becoming commonplace: the program is helping diminish U.S. oil consumption, and the program is not paid for with new money. (Photo: AP) The first argument was reiterated on Friday […]
STREETSBLOG USA

GAO: Economic Recovery Benefits of ‘Cash for Clunkers’ Are ‘Uncertain’

|
"Cash for clunkers," the White House’s much-touted program encouraging trade-ins for more fuel-efficient autos, had an "uncertain" impact on economic recovery, according to a new audit from the independent Government Accountability Office (GAO) — largely because it remains unclear how many of the car sales it spurred would have occurred without taxpayer subsidies. Were "clunker" […]