To Reduce Driving, Put a Real Price on Parking
Today on the Streetsblog Network, Roger Valdez of Worldchanging examines whether making parking more difficult can actually reduce driving levels -- and recalls the frustration he used to feel before he was able to jettison his car:
We've also got a post from Veracity's "Year with Jane Jacobs" project, which is examining Jacobs's ideas from every angle. Today, the subject is how Jacobs viewed the Interstate Highway System as part of a shortsighted post-Depression drive to prioritize full employment above all other considerations. Interesting stuff, especially in these times of stimulus. Also, Trains for America looks at the latest attacks on Amtrak, and Copenhagenize urges Londoners to bike the Tube strike.
Photo by functoruser via Flickr.[F]rankly, one of the things I enjoy the most about not having a car is being free from the hassle of finding a place to park it.
If there is one thing that motivated me to change my driving habits it was the increasing challenge of parking. I used to think that there was a conspiracy to eliminate, one by one, every last available on-street parking spot. There actually is. A major part of Seattle’s strategy to deal with parking is to reduce demand by encouraging people to choose convenient options for getting around besides cars. And beyond my intuition that it works there is some evidence to back up the idea.
According to a review of regional modeling studies done a few years ago by the, parking has a significant impact on reducing VMT. Their review showed that land use and transit policies have very little effect on VMT by themselves unless they include complementary policies that put a price on parking. Free or cheap parking tends to support more driving.