McCain & Coburn: Let’s Make Roads Safer — by Slashing Safety Money

A report released today [PDF] by Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Tom Coburn (R-OK), timed to coincide with debate on a $7 billion highway trust fund fix, accuses their fellow lawmakers of "raiding" the fund for transportation "pet projects."

John_Mccain_bike.jpgSen. John McCain (R-AZ) (Photo: City-Data.com)

What wasteful projects have drawn such scorn from the duo? Not the I-69 road in Indiana, where the governor told planners to bend federal rules while taking federal money.

Not I-66 in Kentucky, a road that has benefited from $90 million in Capitol largess despite being unlikely to ever reach "interstate" status.

No, McCain and Coburn are frustrated by road access improvements, bike paths, and pedestrian safety programs — which get about 1 percent of federal aid despite an estimated 13 percent fatality rate for those who walk the nation’s streets.

Citing
a Government Accountability Office audit that found $78 billion in
trust fund spending on non-road projects over the past five years,
McCain and Coburn classify pedestrian safety as a way to "make roads
more scenic," not safer.

"I don’t mean to diminish safety, but do we really need to spend money on brochures…?" McCain asked in a Senate floor speech.

From the report’s conclusion:

Are all of the projects being funded by the highway trust fund essential priorities?

If
so, then motorists may be forced to sacrifice by paying higher taxes as
some in Congress are proposing. If not, then members of Congress may be
required to sacrifice by eliminating or postponing funding for projects
that are not necessary or are unaffordable at this time.

Since raising taxes on gas has already won support from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the director of the state DOTs’ lobby group, one might expect McCain and Coburn to take a look at that option.

At the very least, perhaps the duo would examine "unaffordable" road projects as well.

Or
maybe McCain could convince Coburn of the wisdom of using highway trust
fund money to pay for inter-city passenger rail. After all, as the
subscription-only CongressDaily reported, in February 2002, McCain once
thought that was a great idea:

A provision in McCain’s bill that would allow states to put their portion of highway trust fund money toward intercity passenger rail
is causing concern among road construction advocates, who said it may
set a precedent for using the fund for projects other than highways. … An aide to McCain said the
provision was designed to give states flexibility to spend money on
their greatest needs.

  • patrick

    Where do you get “13 percent fatality rate for those who walk the nation’s streets.”?

    Are you saying 13 percent of people who walk are going to be killed?

    Perhaps I am misunderstanding but that seems completely wrong. Please cite your source.

  • Chris

    @Patrick – the source is cited in the link within the sentence you’re referring to. The source explains it quite well.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

McCain & Coburn: Inadvertent Transportation Reformers?

|
Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) are no fans of dedicated federal spending on cleaner transportation. From bike and pedestrian safety to local transit funds, the duo has made a habit of attacking non-road projects as wasteful "pork." Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) (Composite Photo: City-Data.com) And yesterday was no exception, as McCain and […]

McCain’s Transit Hit List: Get the Details

|
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), a self-styled foe of what he labels wasteful government spending, has launched a broadside against transit projects in the U.S. DOT’s 2010 spending bill, which is slated for a vote this week in the upper chamber of Congress. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) (Photo: Scrape TV) McCain had proposed more than 20 […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Two-Year Transpo Bill Moves on to Full Senate Without Bike/Ped Protections

|
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate. Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so the […]