<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecting Residential Density and Fuel Consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/11/connecting-residential-density-and-fuel-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/11/connecting-residential-density-and-fuel-consumption/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B.</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/11/connecting-residential-density-and-fuel-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-24161</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=23391#comment-24161</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about how this number of 395 gallons per household was determined, and if that includes potential transition to transit, walking, &amp; bicycle use or if it&#039;s only the less distance driven? I took a glance at the study and didn&#039;t see bicycles &amp; walking mentioned, though some mention of transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about how this number of 395 gallons per household was determined, and if that includes potential transition to transit, walking, &amp; bicycle use or if it&#8217;s only the less distance driven? I took a glance at the study and didn&#8217;t see bicycles &amp; walking mentioned, though some mention of transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

