BART Transit Operators Announce Strike by End of Day Sunday

Jesse_Hunt.jpgATU 1555 President Jesse Hunt announcing strike. Photo: Matthew Roth

Standing in front of union headquarters in downtown Oakland this afternoon, leadership for BART’s Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 1555 announced that their rank and file would walk off the job after the last trains finish their run this Sunday night, effectively shutting down BART across the Bay Area.  ATU 1555 represents train operators and station agents and is the second largest union working for BART, representing roughly 900 employees.

ATU 1555 President Jesse Hunt said that after four months of negotiating, his members turned down a contract proposal and took the members concerns to BART’s negotiating team, thinking the negotiations were fruitful, so he was upset and surprised by the unanimous vote by BART’s Board of Directors to impose a one-year contract on them after an executive session this morning.

"The contract that the BART Board has decided to impose is far worse
than the contract that was in front of our members this week.  It’s a
regressive proposal that will net a seven percent pay cut as well as
eliminate what is our social security to members. Regrettably, they
have taken action to end negotiations."

BART Directors announced they would force the work rules on the ATU’s members after an executive session this morning. 

“This
was not an action we wanted to take,” BART Board of Directors President
Thomas M. Blalock said. “We worked tirelessly to reach a settlement
through the negotiation process but after four very long months of
talks we have reached an impasse. As a result, ATU has left this Board
with no other choice but to implement terms and conditions of
employment. This is a regrettable but necessary step that we must take
in order to immediately begin the urgent process of addressing BART’s
rapidly deteriorating financial situation.”

Hunt said the other BART unions would honor the picket line and that ATU was being asked to shoulder too much burden. "The BART Board’s imposition of this contract calls for cuts, only from the members of ATU,. in ways that have not been discussed at the negotiating table."

Asked why ATU rejected the contract while the two other largest unions, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1021 and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 3993, signed, Hunt said their members voted based on its unfairness.

According to BART, among the terms the Board will impose on ATU members are a cap on health care costs, elimination of BART’s contribution to a secondary pension plan, changes to employee contribution to PERS, changes to worker schedules, changes to work rules and reductions of paid holidays. The terms will remain in effect until a new contract agreement is reached.

When asked about the characterization by BART management of the unions as receiving too much overtime under the contract they sought, Hunt bristled, replying that ATU had come to the table early in the year with an offer of a wage freeze, but that BART management had rejected it.  On overtime, he said forcefully:

Overtime is our members working to ensure the trains run beyond their eight hours, beyond their twelve hours in some cases, on their weekends seven days a week.  We have employees that don’t see their families very often because they’re running the trains or manning the stations to ensure sure that BART maintains its 95 percent on-time rate.  That’s what overtime is. We don’t just show up and they have to pay us, it’s to make sure the trains run on-time.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a statement calling on both sides to come back to the bargaining table and said the State Mediation & Conciliation Service, under the Department of
Industrial Relations, would be standing by to facilitate negotiations and
help both sides reach an agreement.

“I urge both parties to get back to the negotiating table and reach an agreement before any strikes or other job actions are taken. Both sides need to resolve their disputes and come to an agreement before taking drastic action that will have an immediate effect on the daily lives of so many Californians.”

Unless BART’s Board calls for further negotiations before Sunday night, riders across the Bay Area will have to find other means to get to work. Though several riders interviewed by Streetsblog said they thought the unions received a fair salary and good benefits, a surprising number of riders were supportive of the strike, despite the difficulty it could mean for them getting to work on Monday.

"I think it’s their right to organize," said Brook, a resident of Oakland, as he wheeled his bike out of the Lake Merritt station.  He said he would ride his bike to work on Monday. "Just because times are tight, management always gets to ride out hardship on the backs of the working class.  They always use this excuse to pull back benefits."

"I support them.  I support their strike," said Sharon Rose, a resident of Oakland, who said she would take the Transbay bus to work on Monday. "They shouldn’t have to give away givebacks for four years.  If they’re going to give any givebacks it should be for less time."

  • It isn’t surprising that the SFGate commenters are frothing at the mouth considering all the information in the Streetsblog article that wasn’t mention on SFGate. Good job on this, Mr. Roth.

  • Jeffrey W. Baker

    What’s a good solution to the strike, if it happens? Why not change one lane each way on the Bay Bridge to buses only? All lanes restricted to four per car minimum? Take a vacation?

  • “Just because times are tight, management always gets to ride out hardship on the backs of the working class. They always use this excuse to pull back benefits.”

    Instead ATU wants to ride out hardship on the backs of the BART ridership. Regardless of the strike, passengers have had a fare hike imposed on them, and service cuts imposed on them. I don’t see the unions claiming that those imposed conditions were unfair.

    There is a huge difference between this situation and the classic Union battles of yore. This is not a couple of industrial tycoons trying to squeeze out extra profits. This is a money losing, government subsized operation that the general public relies upon.

    If the unions have a primary beef with anyone, it would be with Sacramento and Washington DC, not Dugger and Co. (though any fool would say that BART would be best served to shelve OAC and SJC right now, operations that would assist in closing the gap were they annulled).

    1 Billion Cash for Clunkers gave a helping hand to what, 250,000 car owners? I guess the 355,000 daily BART riders don’t count for anything.

  • Heather Michaels

    It is absolutely disgraceful for the drivers and BART union to strike.

    They are lucky they have good jobs and great benefits in this recession. The other unions approved the contracts. This particular union has decided to be greedy, self-serving and selfish.

    I’m usually pretty sympathetic to unions. Not this time.

    Shame on them.

  • soylatte

    @John Murphy: hear, hear.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

BART Strike Appears Imminent As Board Votes to Impose Contract

|
Flickr photo: apevny The BART Board of Directors voted unanimously today to unilaterally impose terms and conditions of employment on members of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555, which represents up to 900 train operators, station agents and other workers, setting the stage for a potential strike as soon as tomorrow. The move came after […]

BART Strike Announced for Monday Morning

|
For the first time in more than a decade, BART operators and station agents will walk off the job Monday morning in a strike called this afternoon by the president of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 155. "BART has continually taken a retractable position in their demands," ATU President Jesse Hunt told reporters outside the […]

BART Strikes Tentative Labor Deal with Unions

|
Flickr photo: atariboy BART management has reached a tentative deal with three of its five unions, totaling about 2,700 workers, averting a strike that would have strained the Bay Area’s transit systems and gridlocked its roads. The agreement, capping four months of intense negotiations, affects the Service Employees International Union Local 1021 (SEIU), the American […]

One Week Left in Contract, BART Management and Labor Trade Barbs

|
With BART contracts expiring next Tuesday night and regional planning organizations urging Bay Area residents to create a contingency plan for getting to work if there is a strike or labor slowdown, BART management and labor representatives are accusing each other of bad-faith negotiations. Though they are bargaining around the clock and both sides insist […]