Could Electric-Car Tax Credits Become the Next “Cash for Clunkers”?

The White House’s commitment to electrified cars, fulfilling an Obama campaign promise to put 1 million plug-in hybrids into service by 2015, is bound to have serious ramifications for the nation’s already-crumbling system of paying for transportation.

20090731_cash_for_clunkers_33.jpg(Photo: MPR)

But
could the administration continue to leave the gas tax untouched while
relying on taxpayer-subsidized rebates to gin up new car sales? That
prospect is a very real one, as two new posts from the Atlantic and the New Republic observe.

The
first post focuses on the government’s plug-in hybrid tax credit, which
was expanded by the economic stimulus law to offer up to $7,500 per
vehicle for the first 200,000 models sold by every automaker.

The
Atlantic incorrectly states that the stimulus allocated $2 billion to
the credit — that number is the estimated cost of the provision, which
has no dollar limit — but the risk remains the same: If GM sells
200,000 of its Chevy Volts, the credit would take $1.5 billion in revenue from government coffers.

If similar successes for the Nissan Leaf
and the upcoming plug-in Toyota Prius follow, it’s easy to see the cost
of the tax credit topping $4 billion. And as "cash for clunkers" showed,
members of Congress are loath to limit popular pro-industry programs
during an economic slowdown for fear of "messing with success" —
regardless of the estimated costs of the benefits in question.

That could lead to an extension of the plug-in hybrid credit to continue stimulating sales, at a continued cost to the already-depleted Treasury. Meanwhile, the less popular option of increasing the gas tax would immediately pay for itself (as my colleague Ryan put it earlier).

The New Republic’s post looks at a still-unpassed proposal for "feebates,"
a combination of taxes on gas-chuggers and rebates for buyers who
choose cars that exceed fuel-efficiency standards. Again, feebates
follow the "cash for clunkers" template by using taxpayer money — the
fees are not guaranteed to offset the rebates and likely wouldn’t if
drivers flock to efficient models — to encourage greener car-buying
behavior.

But even if an "independent mileage benchmark" were used to ensure that the feebates pay for themselves, as the author suggests,
the more prudent course of action would be simply to keep raising
fuel-efficiency (CAFE) standards. Given that a proposal for a 40 miles
per gallon standard fell three votes short of becoming law 20 years ago, the current 35.5-mpg plan appears ripe for an upgrade.

The
issue comes down to political courage: Offering rebates and tax credits
doesn’t require much of it, but raising the gas tax and CAFE standards
takes quite a lot.

  • Hi Elana- first – thanks for catching these 2 articles (New Repub’ and Atlantic) However- neither article describes a “cash for clunker” approach- it’s more of a “cash” approach- that’s the whole beauty of CARS-Gov – it’s a double edged sword: In with the new-out with the old

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Senator Takes Hybrid Hummer on a Semi-Wild Ride

|
Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank has a knack for puncturing Capitol Hill’s bubble of obliviousness. His classics include the spotting of Senate Environment & Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) leaving an event that protested high gas prices in an 18-miles-per-gallon car — for the one-block trip back to her office. In his latest […]

Sen. Mikulski Supports Car Tax Breaks While Transit Languishes

|
This just in from the Streetsblog Network: Greater Greater Washington takes Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski to task for supporting car sales tax breaks — and asks how that money could be better spent: Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) touts tax breaks for car buyers at the 2009 Motor Trend International Auto Show in Baltimore. Photo by […]