<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ghost Streets of San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-542409</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-542409</guid>
		<description>These &quot;ghost streets&quot; or &quot;unaccepted streets&quot; as the Department of Public Works calls them, are absolutely fascinating. The neighbors who have decided to engage with these spaces have been really imaginative. This kind of investigation of unusual spaces is exactly what Dubord and the Situationists wanted. They wanted people to seek out alternative possibilities to what exists “through practices such as the derive and pschyogeography ” (Pinder, Visions of the City).The maps that de Monchaux have created are “attempts to ‘undo’ elements of the current socio-spatial order and defend, articulate and promote other values” (Pinder, Visions of the City). In this case, the neighbors took it upon themselves to replenish and maintain their surrounding urban spaces with greenery. De Monchaux’s psychogeographical maps can be used in various hypotheses or attempts to outline new social spaces. The grids of San Francisco were very rigidly planned and implemented, but there are many slivers and nooks of spaces that don’t fit. There are a lot possibilities and opportunities for how these areas can be used, but it requires people to get off of their spectator’s seat and do some wandering. A more mobile engagement with the city allows for people to gain a better understanding how theses space were used in the past and also to imagine multiple future possibilities. It is very much a bottom-up, experimental, social, and local approach to urbanism. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These &#8220;ghost streets&#8221; or &#8220;unaccepted streets&#8221; as the Department of Public Works calls them, are absolutely fascinating. The neighbors who have decided to engage with these spaces have been really imaginative. This kind of investigation of unusual spaces is exactly what Dubord and the Situationists wanted. They wanted people to seek out alternative possibilities to what exists “through practices such as the derive and pschyogeography ” (Pinder, Visions of the City).The maps that de Monchaux have created are “attempts to ‘undo’ elements of the current socio-spatial order and defend, articulate and promote other values” (Pinder, Visions of the City). In this case, the neighbors took it upon themselves to replenish and maintain their surrounding urban spaces with greenery. De Monchaux’s psychogeographical maps can be used in various hypotheses or attempts to outline new social spaces. The grids of San Francisco were very rigidly planned and implemented, but there are many slivers and nooks of spaces that don’t fit. There are a lot possibilities and opportunities for how these areas can be used, but it requires people to get off of their spectator’s seat and do some wandering. A more mobile engagement with the city allows for people to gain a better understanding how theses space were used in the past and also to imagine multiple future possibilities. It is very much a bottom-up, experimental, social, and local approach to urbanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Wong</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-488922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-488922</guid>
		<description>One of my favorites is the area near Larkin and Francisco Streets on Russian Hill. At Chestnut Larkin splits to become a brick-lined cul de sac on one side and a narrow curved street that leads to Francisco. At the end of the curve there is a fork that leads to another cul de sac that is the driveway to a secluded house, then becomes a pedestrian path that borders a reservoir and leads to Hyde Street. There is also the Larkin Street steps that go from the first cul de sac to the curved street, a second set of steps that lead to the house and a third set of steps that end in a park and connect to a path that leads toward Larkin and Bay Streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorites is the area near Larkin and Francisco Streets on Russian Hill. At Chestnut Larkin splits to become a brick-lined cul de sac on one side and a narrow curved street that leads to Francisco. At the end of the curve there is a fork that leads to another cul de sac that is the driveway to a secluded house, then becomes a pedestrian path that borders a reservoir and leads to Hyde Street. There is also the Larkin Street steps that go from the first cul de sac to the curved street, a second set of steps that lead to the house and a third set of steps that end in a park and connect to a path that leads toward Larkin and Bay Streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Johnson</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-483512</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-483512</guid>
		<description>Good Morning,

  Does anyone happen to know the name of the Alley Way between Casselli Avenue and 19th Street between Douglas and Yukon Streets in San Francisco&#039;s Eureka Valley Neighborhood.  Thank you.
Floragrace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning,</p>
<p>  Does anyone happen to know the name of the Alley Way between Casselli Avenue and 19th Street between Douglas and Yukon Streets in San Francisco&#8217;s Eureka Valley Neighborhood.  Thank you.<br />
Floragrace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikesonn</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-480835</link>
		<dc:creator>mikesonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-480835</guid>
		<description>I always was amazed by that Reno. It looks like an entrance to the back of the building, but it has a street sign like Andy mentions. I love the two stories above it too. Wonder if that was more common before the earthquake and fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always was amazed by that Reno. It looks like an entrance to the back of the building, but it has a street sign like Andy mentions. I love the two stories above it too. Wonder if that was more common before the earthquake and fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Fischer</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-480825</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-480825</guid>
		<description>The great thing about Reno is that it actually goes right through a building!  I can&#039;t think of any other San Francisco streets that do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about Reno is that it actually goes right through a building!  I can&#8217;t think of any other San Francisco streets that do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-480823</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-480823</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite ghost streets is tiny Reno Street in North Beach. Though it does have a street sign, it barely qualifies as a &quot;street&quot; or even an alley; it just seems like a little strip to leave the trash cans, or to access a couple apartments. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite ghost streets is tiny Reno Street in North Beach. Though it does have a street sign, it barely qualifies as a &#8220;street&#8221; or even an alley; it just seems like a little strip to leave the trash cans, or to access a couple apartments. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Fischer</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-384941</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-384941</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Fout Avenue&quot; also appears in the 1920 city directory (http://www.archive.org/stream/sanfranciscocali1920polk#page/1648/mode/2up)

The index describes it as &quot;Fout Avenue, off Eighteenth, from S of Clarendon Ave, S to Pemberton Pl.&quot;  I think it is now Twin Peaks Boulevard but can&#039;t find a map to confirm that right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Fout Avenue&#8221; also appears in the 1920 city directory (<a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/sanfranciscocali1920polk#page/1648/mode/2up" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/stream/sanfranciscocali1920polk#page/1648/mode/2up</a>)</p>
<p>The index describes it as &#8220;Fout Avenue, off Eighteenth, from S of Clarendon Ave, S to Pemberton Pl.&#8221;  I think it is now Twin Peaks Boulevard but can&#8217;t find a map to confirm that right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ellen</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-384701</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-384701</guid>
		<description>Found your blog while looking for a San Francisco &quot;lost&quot; street.  The name is Fout Avenue and was somewhere near Al&#039;s Park.  Came across the name in 1920 US census record and voter registration.  Mrs. Catherine Workman 20 Fout Ave.  It is near 328 Corbett Ave.  Have you ever heard of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found your blog while looking for a San Francisco &#8220;lost&#8221; street.  The name is Fout Avenue and was somewhere near Al&#8217;s Park.  Came across the name in 1920 US census record and voter registration.  Mrs. Catherine Workman 20 Fout Ave.  It is near 328 Corbett Ave.  Have you ever heard of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-233191</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-233191</guid>
		<description>Chris I really enjoyed your blog and photo,along with the comments from your readers. I grew up in S.F. and many of the areas I have traveled. Does anyone know where I can find photo of the Crocker Amazon Naval Housing Projects that were up in the 1950&#039;s? I recall that area and remember the housing behind the now beautified Crocker Amazon Park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I really enjoyed your blog and photo,along with the comments from your readers. I grew up in S.F. and many of the areas I have traveled. Does anyone know where I can find photo of the Crocker Amazon Naval Housing Projects that were up in the 1950&#8242;s? I recall that area and remember the housing behind the now beautified Crocker Amazon Park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefferson</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-66721</link>
		<dc:creator>jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-66721</guid>
		<description>hey Chris,
glad I stumbled on this. alot of fun.
maybe I&#039;ll run into you at a Giants game again next year.

jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Chris,<br />
glad I stumbled on this. alot of fun.<br />
maybe I&#8217;ll run into you at a Giants game again next year.</p>
<p>jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah Sanders</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-47541</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-47541</guid>
		<description>What a fantastic post! Thanks so much for sharing these. I&#039;m chipping away at a many year project of walking every street, every block in San Francisco and these are some great treasures to seek out as I fill things in.

Perhaps a bunch of us SF street geeks should get together sometime for a ramble?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fantastic post! Thanks so much for sharing these. I&#8217;m chipping away at a many year project of walking every street, every block in San Francisco and these are some great treasures to seek out as I fill things in.</p>
<p>Perhaps a bunch of us SF street geeks should get together sometime for a ramble?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28831</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28831</guid>
		<description>I second throgers! Those keymaps are an amazing cache for the detail-oriented. Other useful maps can be found at http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/dpwweb/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second throgers! Those keymaps are an amazing cache for the detail-oriented. Other useful maps can be found at <a href="http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/dpwweb/" rel="nofollow">http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/dpwweb/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28791</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Bachmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28791</guid>
		<description>A very enjoyable article, Chris! I actually saw a link to it on the Flickr group &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/groups/guesswheresf/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guess Where SF&lt;/a&gt;, which I&#039;ve mentioned to you before, and I suggest you join (I think you would be really good at it). The previous two commenters I recognize from that group as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very enjoyable article, Chris! I actually saw a link to it on the Flickr group <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/guesswheresf/" rel="nofollow">Guess Where SF</a>, which I&#8217;ve mentioned to you before, and I suggest you join (I think you would be really good at it). The previous two commenters I recognize from that group as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: throgers</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28751</link>
		<dc:creator>throgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28751</guid>
		<description>Neat post!  If you want to take the dorking out to a new level, the DPW key maps (http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/keymap/) can be used to figure out if an area is technically part of the public right-of-way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat post!  If you want to take the dorking out to a new level, the DPW key maps (<a href="http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/keymap/" rel="nofollow">http://bsm.sfdpw.org/subdivision/keymap/</a>) can be used to figure out if an area is technically part of the public right-of-way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Fischer</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28681</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28681</guid>
		<description>Legally, even some waterways in San Francisco are officially streets! (Channel Street for Mission Creek, Islais Street for Islais Creek)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legally, even some waterways in San Francisco are officially streets! (Channel Street for Mission Creek, Islais Street for Islais Creek)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omri</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28671</link>
		<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28671</guid>
		<description>&quot;If there is no flat surface underfoot, i.e. it&#039;s all stairs, isn&#039;t it something other than a street?&quot;

No. A street is a public right of way. Plenty of streets around the world are too narrow for cars, or composed of steps (e.g. the Spanish Steps in Rome, or some spots on the northern tip of Manhattan). In the Arab World, some streets have roofs (the casbahs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If there is no flat surface underfoot, i.e. it&#8217;s all stairs, isn&#8217;t it something other than a street?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. A street is a public right of way. Plenty of streets around the world are too narrow for cars, or composed of steps (e.g. the Spanish Steps in Rome, or some spots on the northern tip of Manhattan). In the Arab World, some streets have roofs (the casbahs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cereal</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28631</link>
		<dc:creator>Cereal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28631</guid>
		<description>&quot;If I may quibble over semantics, please: the quote marks are unnecessary. Even if it&#039;s not passable by a car, it&#039;s still a street.&quot;

I&#039;m not so sure about this statement.

Car access is certainly not a requirement of street-ness, I agree.

But -if it&#039;s not paved, is it still a &quot;street?&quot;  Or perhaps a path?

If it&#039;s incredibly narrow, wouldn&#039;t it be more like an alley or a passage (at best) than a street?  The narrow space between a pair of buildings, if navigable, surely isn&#039;t a &quot;street?&quot;

If there is no flat surface underfoot, i.e. it&#039;s all stairs, isn&#039;t it something other than a street?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If I may quibble over semantics, please: the quote marks are unnecessary. Even if it&#8217;s not passable by a car, it&#8217;s still a street.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about this statement.</p>
<p>Car access is certainly not a requirement of street-ness, I agree.</p>
<p>But -if it&#8217;s not paved, is it still a &#8220;street?&#8221;  Or perhaps a path?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s incredibly narrow, wouldn&#8217;t it be more like an alley or a passage (at best) than a street?  The narrow space between a pair of buildings, if navigable, surely isn&#8217;t a &#8220;street?&#8221;</p>
<p>If there is no flat surface underfoot, i.e. it&#8217;s all stairs, isn&#8217;t it something other than a street?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omri</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28581</link>
		<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28581</guid>
		<description>If I may quibble over semantics, please: the quote marks are unnecessary. Even if it&#039;s not passable by a car, it&#039;s still a street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may quibble over semantics, please: the quote marks are unnecessary. Even if it&#8217;s not passable by a car, it&#8217;s still a street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28561</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28561</guid>
		<description>I live next door to the person who owns the sculpture in the first shot and this isn&#039;t doing her justice.  She has some amazing sculptures, about 2 dozen total, all over her yard.  They are all different, and blend together beautifully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live next door to the person who owns the sculpture in the first shot and this isn&#8217;t doing her justice.  She has some amazing sculptures, about 2 dozen total, all over her yard.  They are all different, and blend together beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/08/24/eyes-on-the-street-the-ghost-streets-of-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-28551</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=30341#comment-28551</guid>
		<description>I think many of you may know the book &quot;Stairway Walks of San Francisco&quot; by Adah Bakalinsky, but if you don&#039;t, you should definitely get a copy.  It covers a number of the streets mentioned here, as well as a bunch of other stairways and &quot;ghost&quot; streets.  

My wife and I find that taking any of these walks is a true joy and have done most of them by this point.  Most walks are an hour or so at a leisurely pace, and I highly recommend it for urban walkers.  We find it especially nice to take the Muni to the start of the walk, so we can learn some new Muni lines as well.

I see it is available on Amazon, including used editions, but I think many local bookstores have it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of you may know the book &#8220;Stairway Walks of San Francisco&#8221; by Adah Bakalinsky, but if you don&#8217;t, you should definitely get a copy.  It covers a number of the streets mentioned here, as well as a bunch of other stairways and &#8220;ghost&#8221; streets.  </p>
<p>My wife and I find that taking any of these walks is a true joy and have done most of them by this point.  Most walks are an hour or so at a leisurely pace, and I highly recommend it for urban walkers.  We find it especially nice to take the Muni to the start of the walk, so we can learn some new Muni lines as well.</p>
<p>I see it is available on Amazon, including used editions, but I think many local bookstores have it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

