<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll: Public Supports Congestion Tolling Over Gas Tax Hike by 2 to 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Anderson</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-31531</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=35801#comment-31531</guid>
		<description>A Chamber of Commerce poll earlier this year found little support for congestion pricing in San Francisco.

http://district5diary.blogspot.com/2009/02/chamber-of-commerce-poll.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Chamber of Commerce poll earlier this year found little support for congestion pricing in San Francisco.</p>
<p><a href="http://district5diary.blogspot.com/2009/02/chamber-of-commerce-poll.html" rel="nofollow">http://district5diary.blogspot.com/2009/02/chamber-of-commerce-poll.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-31461</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=35801#comment-31461</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFResident</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-31381</link>
		<dc:creator>SFResident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=35801#comment-31381</guid>
		<description>I think that John Murphy decoded this poll pretty well. People are most likely to &quot;support&quot; the kinds of tolls and taxes that they don&#039;t think they themselves will have to pay. This is why a patently stupid idea like increasing public transit fares to pay for &quot;expanding highway capacity&quot; gets more support than increasing the gasoline tax.

All that this poll demonstrates is that people are pretty selfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that John Murphy decoded this poll pretty well. People are most likely to &#8220;support&#8221; the kinds of tolls and taxes that they don&#8217;t think they themselves will have to pay. This is why a patently stupid idea like increasing public transit fares to pay for &#8220;expanding highway capacity&#8221; gets more support than increasing the gasoline tax.</p>
<p>All that this poll demonstrates is that people are pretty selfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Murphy</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-31361</link>
		<dc:creator>John Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=35801#comment-31361</guid>
		<description>A lot of respondents think &quot;I have to buy gas but I won&#039;t use the HOT lanes, so if we go to congestion pricing someone else pays, not me&quot;. Of course, once implemented (assuming the HOT lane was a conversion of an existing lane) then all hell would break loose as those who don&#039;t want to pay for the HOT lane complain about the congestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of respondents think &#8220;I have to buy gas but I won&#8217;t use the HOT lanes, so if we go to congestion pricing someone else pays, not me&#8221;. Of course, once implemented (assuming the HOT lane was a conversion of an existing lane) then all hell would break loose as those who don&#8217;t want to pay for the HOT lane complain about the congestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/01/new-poll-public-supports-congestion-tolling-over-gas-tax-hike-by-2-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-31331</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=35801#comment-31331</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I suspect HNTB stands to make a lot of money installing tolling equipment and building the new HOT lanes, while a simple gas tax would cost nothing to implement (therefore no revenue for them) and reduce future construction needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I suspect HNTB stands to make a lot of money installing tolling equipment and building the new HOT lanes, while a simple gas tax would cost nothing to implement (therefore no revenue for them) and reduce future construction needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

