Feds Still Forcing Transit Agencies to Bow to Private Charter Buses

Streetsblog Capitol Hill reported yesterday
that the U.S. DOT would end a Bush-era mandate to reward new transit
projects for using private contractors — but a similar
pro-privatization rule for bus service remains in effect, preventing
local transit agencies from competing with private charter companies.

1fairbus0903.jpgFairgoers
in Minnesota depart a private charter bus that benefited from federal
rules barring competition with public transit agencies. (Photo: Star-Trib)

The rule, finalized last year, has forced Washington D.C.’s Metrobus to stop providing free buses to Redskins football games and blocked Indianapolis’ transit agency from offering lower-cost service to the town’s famed Indy 500 car race.

This
year, it’s Minnesota State Fair attendees who are contending with
privatized bus service that left them waiting for hours and caused
"ugly scenes," as the local Star-Tribune reports today.

The rule was intended to shield "private charter operators from unfair competition by
federally subsidized public transit agencies," as the Bush administration wrote in its initial regulatory justification. 

As
a result, public transit agencies were barred from offering bus
services to special events if a private company was able to do the job
instead. The rule prompted outcries from the American Public Transportation Association, but it has yet to be overturned by the Obama administration.

In
a June letter to senior members of the House transportation committee,
19 lawmakers — three of them Republican — asked for the rule to be
reversed in the next long-term federal infrastructure bill. From the
letter, spearheaded by Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and David Dreier (R-CA):

By
making public transit agencies ineligible to provide what has always
been considered public transit service, this ill-advised [Federal
Transit Administration] rulemaking contradicts federal goals to
encourage public transportation to alleviate traffic congestion and
improve air quality nationwide.

Charter bus service is reserved and exclusive service to
events, many of which are traditionally open only to a select group.
Service open to any member of the public to board and ride, without
advance reservation, to a public event has always been considered
public service and that definition should be restored.

That long-term infrastructure bill is likely to be delayed for at least a year at the request
of the White House, however. The question is whether the FTA is willing
to undo the pro-privatization rule on its own before the bill is taken
up.

(thanks to commenter Brad on the Transport Politic for the link)

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Proposition G and the Fix Muni Syndrome

|
As the November election draws near and the bunkers are dug on either side of San Francisco’s Proposition G, the Fix Muni Now ballot measure spearheaded by Supervisor Sean Elsbernd, the rhetoric is escalating, with Mayor Gavin Newsom, the San Francisco Chronicle’s Editorial Board and Elsbernd on one side decrying Muni operators for taking raises […]

Transit Outsourcing Booms — But Are There Safety Trade-offs?

|
New Orleans streetcars, such as the one pictured above, are about to be outsourced to a private French company. (Photo: NYT) The Wall Street Journal reports today on the growing number of cities around the country that are in talks to outsource local transit systems to cope with the budgetary pressures of the recession. New […]

The Case Against the “Empty Bus” Argument

|
Jarrett Walker at Human Transit provides useful ammunition in the battle of reasonable people against knee-jerk transit-bashers. Walker begins his post by quoting from a story in Canada’s National Post headlined "Save the Environment: Don’t Take Transit." The article posits that because many buses run empty for much of the day, they are environmentally inferior […]