<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reaction to Market Street Pilot Seems Overwhemingly Positive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZA</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34821</link>
		<dc:creator>ZA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34821</guid>
		<description>Suggestion: shop for the 6 weeks of the pilot test in that area of Market St, and make sure you tell the merchants you are there to support these improvements to Market.

You&#039;ve got the following breakfast/lunch selections for you and your coworkers:
- At least 3 donut place
- At least 2 taquerias
- At least 2 pizza joints
- At least 3 sandwich shops
- At least 1 juice place
- At least 2 burger places
- At least 2 Chinese food sites
- At least 1 Brazilian meat place

(burn the grease on a ride later)

...and a handful of clothing stores. (too bad those pool halls are gone, I think)

And that&#039;s only along Market Street itself, when there isn&#039;t the Farmers Market.

If only 1% of bicycling commuters on Market St stopped over for a doughnut or a banana, it&#039;ll make a good impression, and its something almost all of us can afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion: shop for the 6 weeks of the pilot test in that area of Market St, and make sure you tell the merchants you are there to support these improvements to Market.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got the following breakfast/lunch selections for you and your coworkers:<br />
- At least 3 donut place<br />
- At least 2 taquerias<br />
- At least 2 pizza joints<br />
- At least 3 sandwich shops<br />
- At least 1 juice place<br />
- At least 2 burger places<br />
- At least 2 Chinese food sites<br />
- At least 1 Brazilian meat place</p>
<p>(burn the grease on a ride later)</p>
<p>&#8230;and a handful of clothing stores. (too bad those pool halls are gone, I think)</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s only along Market Street itself, when there isn&#8217;t the Farmers Market.</p>
<p>If only 1% of bicycling commuters on Market St stopped over for a doughnut or a banana, it&#8217;ll make a good impression, and its something almost all of us can afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the greasybear</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34781</link>
		<dc:creator>the greasybear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34781</guid>
		<description>Accepting the idea that remaining vehicle speeds will increase absent private motorists on lower Market Street, is it resonable for Akit to direct our worry over potential pedestrians safety explicitly on cyclists, and on cyclists alone?

No. The MTA&#039;s SF 2007 Collision Report shows cyclists were involved in only 3% of injury collisions with pedestrians (pp 14-15). None of those collisions were fatal. Why focus only on the supposed danger posed by the least dangerous vehicles on the road, then? Bias. Cyclists, we&#039;re constantly told by non-cyclists, are uniquely naughty--let the facts be damned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accepting the idea that remaining vehicle speeds will increase absent private motorists on lower Market Street, is it resonable for Akit to direct our worry over potential pedestrians safety explicitly on cyclists, and on cyclists alone?</p>
<p>No. The MTA&#8217;s SF 2007 Collision Report shows cyclists were involved in only 3% of injury collisions with pedestrians (pp 14-15). None of those collisions were fatal. Why focus only on the supposed danger posed by the least dangerous vehicles on the road, then? Bias. Cyclists, we&#8217;re constantly told by non-cyclists, are uniquely naughty&#8211;let the facts be damned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFResident</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34651</link>
		<dc:creator>SFResident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34651</guid>
		<description>@jym - As a pedestrian and non-bicyclist myself I&#039;ve had more than my share of run-ins with obnoxious bicyclists who show patent disregard for the safety of others. What&#039;s needed is to convince people like Akit that traffic calming and creating a car-free Market Street will actaully make bicycling in the city safer and, as a result, encourage a wider demographic to take-up bicycling. Like Michael Smith I firmly believe that it will - it&#039;s much easier to ride civilly when you don&#039;t have to dodge crazy drivers. Hell, I might even consider riding a bike myself if the city&#039;s infrastructure improves significantly. . . .

For every grumpy-jerky zealot like Rob Anderson there are a thousand people, bicyclists and non-bicyclists alike, who just want safe, clean, and orderly streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jym &#8211; As a pedestrian and non-bicyclist myself I&#8217;ve had more than my share of run-ins with obnoxious bicyclists who show patent disregard for the safety of others. What&#8217;s needed is to convince people like Akit that traffic calming and creating a car-free Market Street will actaully make bicycling in the city safer and, as a result, encourage a wider demographic to take-up bicycling. Like Michael Smith I firmly believe that it will &#8211; it&#8217;s much easier to ride civilly when you don&#8217;t have to dodge crazy drivers. Hell, I might even consider riding a bike myself if the city&#8217;s infrastructure improves significantly. . . .</p>
<p>For every grumpy-jerky zealot like Rob Anderson there are a thousand people, bicyclists and non-bicyclists alike, who just want safe, clean, and orderly streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jym</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34611</guid>
		<description>=v= Akit has wandered over here from SFGate, where it is mandatory to respond to any mention of bicycles or transit by squawking about helmets and fixies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=v= Akit has wandered over here from SFGate, where it is mandatory to respond to any mention of bicycles or transit by squawking about helmets and fixies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34561</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34561</guid>
		<description>Akit, do you really think that the problem daredevil bicyclists are the ones who will be more encouraged to use Market St? Seems that just the opposite will be true. By making Market St safer for bicyclists then we should see an increase in bicyclists who were avoiding bicycling there because they felt unsafe, the polar opposite of daredevil cyclists. This is exactly who we should be helping. The daredevil cyclists can find some other crappy street to take risks on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akit, do you really think that the problem daredevil bicyclists are the ones who will be more encouraged to use Market St? Seems that just the opposite will be true. By making Market St safer for bicyclists then we should see an increase in bicyclists who were avoiding bicycling there because they felt unsafe, the polar opposite of daredevil cyclists. This is exactly who we should be helping. The daredevil cyclists can find some other crappy street to take risks on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akit</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/reaction-to-market-street-pilot-seems-overwhemingly-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-34551</link>
		<dc:creator>Akit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=41231#comment-34551</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m worried if bicyclists (especially those daredevils who don&#039;t wear helmets and/or use fixed gear bikes) will go even faster and be even more dangerous to pedestrians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m worried if bicyclists (especially those daredevils who don&#8217;t wear helmets and/or use fixed gear bikes) will go even faster and be even more dangerous to pedestrians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

