<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SFPD and Health Department Announce Pedestrian Safety Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:49:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jass</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-48121</link>
		<dc:creator>jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=70641#comment-48121</guid>
		<description>Traffic enforcement should never be for revenue generation, but be revenue neutral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic enforcement should never be for revenue generation, but be revenue neutral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-48001</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=70641#comment-48001</guid>
		<description>Actually, Dan, it&#039;s not a good way of increasing long-term revenue.  It&#039;s a great way of changing behaviour, but once everyone figures out that these laws will be enforced, they&#039;ll stop endangering the safety of pedestrians... and ticket revenue will go down as a result.  This is why red light cameras don&#039;t work well as a revenue stream.  Unless you adjust the timing of the lights to create unsafe conditions, drivers notice the cameras and tend to stop running reds.

I think that stepping up traffic enforcement is something that is long overdue, but to rely on it for long-term income is a mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Dan, it's not a good way of increasing long-term revenue.  It's a great way of changing behaviour, but once everyone figures out that these laws will be enforced, they'll stop endangering the safety of pedestrians... and ticket revenue will go down as a result.  This is why red light cameras don't work well as a revenue stream.  Unless you adjust the timing of the lights to create unsafe conditions, drivers notice the cameras and tend to stop running reds.</p>
<p>I think that stepping up traffic enforcement is something that is long overdue, but to rely on it for long-term income is a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-47991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=70641#comment-47991</guid>
		<description>If the City is looking for a way to increase revenue this is a much more beneficial &amp; well-intentioned way of doing so as opposed to increasing parking meter hours.  In theory this will make the streets safer &amp; help close the deficit.  I say go for it!  There are few things more annoying and dangerous than having cars squeeze in between you and the available space in the cross walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the City is looking for a way to increase revenue this is a much more beneficial &amp; well-intentioned way of doing so as opposed to increasing parking meter hours.  In theory this will make the streets safer &amp; help close the deficit.  I say go for it!  There are few things more annoying and dangerous than having cars squeeze in between you and the available space in the cross walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Whitaker</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/10/22/sfpd-and-health-department-announce-pedestrian-safety-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-47961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Whitaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=70641#comment-47961</guid>
		<description>Wonderful news!

I&#039;d encourage stings at Main and Harrison Street, Folsom and 1st Street, and 3rd and Mission Street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful news!</p>
<p>I'd encourage stings at Main and Harrison Street, Folsom and 1st Street, and 3rd and Mission Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
