http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/03/buffett%e2%80%99s-bet-on-burlington-what-does-it-mean-for-transport-and-energy/ Covering San Francisco's livable streets movement Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/03/buffett%e2%80%99s-bet-on-burlington-what-does-it-mean-for-transport-and-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-52891 zsolt Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:54:21 +0000 http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=78441#comment-52891 I don't quite get it, at this point it seems to be Buffett's doing what the government should be doing. Yeah, so it will run on fossil fuel. Whatever we do for a great while, will run on fossil fuel. You couldn't run a national railroad network on renewables if you wanted to. Like Peter, I take trains over trucks any day. I don’t quite get it, at this point it seems to be Buffett’s doing what the government should be doing. Yeah, so it will run on fossil fuel. Whatever we do for a great while, will run on fossil fuel. You couldn’t run a national railroad network on renewables if you wanted to. Like Peter, I take trains over trucks any day.

]]> http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/03/buffett%e2%80%99s-bet-on-burlington-what-does-it-mean-for-transport-and-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-52721 Peter Smith Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:31:39 +0000 http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=78441#comment-52721 coal or no coal, i'm for freight trains instead of trucks. coal or no coal, i’m for freight trains instead of trucks.

]]>