<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:33:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zsolt</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/comment-page-1/#comment-53251</link>
		<dc:creator>zsolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=79631#comment-53251</guid>
		<description>Reading other websites such as SFGate on the Muni sting, it is remarkable how much people are in favor and welcome this. Mind you, the same people would have their panties in a bumch if the city would take comparable action against motorists. The double standard is striking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading other websites such as SFGate on the Muni sting, it is remarkable how much people are in favor and welcome this. Mind you, the same people would have their panties in a bumch if the city would take comparable action against motorists. The double standard is striking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikesonn</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/comment-page-1/#comment-53231</link>
		<dc:creator>mikesonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=79631#comment-53231</guid>
		<description>patrick, Newsome should start with being present within the city first. Sad it went from not seeing him on MUNI to just not seeing him ever in the city!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patrick, Newsome should start with being present within the city first. Sad it went from not seeing him on MUNI to just not seeing him ever in the city!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/comment-page-1/#comment-53201</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=79631#comment-53201</guid>
		<description>Wow, can we trade mayors with London. Not only does he save people while riding a bike, he scouts out future bike lanes while riding his bike! I don&#039;t know anything else about the guy, but that already puts him way ahead of Newsom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, can we trade mayors with London. Not only does he save people while riding a bike, he scouts out future bike lanes while riding his bike! I don't know anything else about the guy, but that already puts him way ahead of Newsom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikesonn</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/comment-page-1/#comment-53161</link>
		<dc:creator>mikesonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=79631#comment-53161</guid>
		<description>But I will agree that if the SFMTA goes through with building the CS 90&#039;-100&#039; below grade, that barely anyone from Chinatown is going to ride it. And if they don&#039;t push HARD for an extension to North Beach, then a lot of people are going to see reduced bus service with no option but to walk down Stockton (through the worse pedestrian corridor in the city) almost to the tunnel to descend 70&#039; to catch a 2 car light rail that only comes every 7-10 mins.

What a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I will agree that if the SFMTA goes through with building the CS 90'-100' below grade, that barely anyone from Chinatown is going to ride it. And if they don't push HARD for an extension to North Beach, then a lot of people are going to see reduced bus service with no option but to walk down Stockton (through the worse pedestrian corridor in the city) almost to the tunnel to descend 70' to catch a 2 car light rail that only comes every 7-10 mins.</p>
<p>What a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikesonn</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/05/todays-headlines-212/comment-page-1/#comment-53151</link>
		<dc:creator>mikesonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=79631#comment-53151</guid>
		<description>It was Beyond Chron that hosted that guest blogger not SFBG.

That was a horribly written editorial. It was a mishmash, regurgitation of SPUR&#039;s report. While I agree that if we are stuck with this project, then a shallower option has to be considered. But to say that cut and cover wouldn&#039;t hurt Chinatown or Market street is to completely ignore the damage that building BART down Market caused.

One last thing, MUNI is a division of SFMTA. Therefore, MUNI is not the one pushing the project, SFMTA is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Beyond Chron that hosted that guest blogger not SFBG.</p>
<p>That was a horribly written editorial. It was a mishmash, regurgitation of SPUR's report. While I agree that if we are stuck with this project, then a shallower option has to be considered. But to say that cut and cover wouldn't hurt Chinatown or Market street is to completely ignore the damage that building BART down Market caused.</p>
<p>One last thing, MUNI is a division of SFMTA. Therefore, MUNI is not the one pushing the project, SFMTA is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
