<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Files List of Bike Projects Likely in First Year After Injunction is Lifted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:33:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/comment-page-1/#comment-53891</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=81351#comment-53891</guid>
		<description>So if your trying to build bicycle infrastructure you need to wait 6 years for an EIR to be completed. Yet if you build a stadium you can just skip over that part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if your trying to build bicycle infrastructure you need to wait 6 years for an EIR to be completed. Yet if you build a stadium you can just skip over that part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphstahoe</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/comment-page-1/#comment-53761</link>
		<dc:creator>murphstahoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=81351#comment-53761</guid>
		<description>Mississippi from Mariposa to 16th? The whole cycling world rides Mississippi from Mariposa to 17th and goes left on 17th. A bike lane might be counter-intuitive here.

Here&#039;s hoping Townsend gets done. That street is a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mississippi from Mariposa to 16th? The whole cycling world rides Mississippi from Mariposa to 17th and goes left on 17th. A bike lane might be counter-intuitive here.</p>
<p>Here's hoping Townsend gets done. That street is a mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/comment-page-1/#comment-53691</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=81351#comment-53691</guid>
		<description>How is Cesar Chavez not a priority?  Because it takes away parking?  Keep your cars folks!  You&#039;ll need them in SF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is Cesar Chavez not a priority?  Because it takes away parking?  Keep your cars folks!  You'll need them in SF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/comment-page-1/#comment-53681</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=81351#comment-53681</guid>
		<description>Reversible?  Like a jacket?  Sweet, pure, tasty bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reversible?  Like a jacket?  Sweet, pure, tasty bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/06/city-files-list-of-bike-projects-likely-in-first-year-after-injunction-is-lifted/comment-page-1/#comment-53671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=81351#comment-53671</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure a lot of people are looking at that list and wondering what&#039;s geting left out. Here&#039;s my take:

-Great Highway bike lanes
-16th St lanes
-5th St
-Division
-McCoppin path
-17th St
-23rd St
-Bayshore
-CC
-North Point
-Portola (from O&#039;S to Sloat)
-the Glen Park package
-Sagamore
-Holloway 
-John Muir

On a happier note, today happens to be the 11 year anniversary of the Board of Supervisor&#039;s approval of a 1 year trial of bike lanes on Valencia Street(11/6/98). So effectively the Valencia St lanes turned 10 years old today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sure a lot of people are looking at that list and wondering what's geting left out. Here's my take:</p>
<p>-Great Highway bike lanes<br />
-16th St lanes<br />
-5th St<br />
-Division<br />
-McCoppin path<br />
-17th St<br />
-23rd St<br />
-Bayshore<br />
-CC<br />
-North Point<br />
-Portola (from O'S to Sloat)<br />
-the Glen Park package<br />
-Sagamore<br />
-Holloway<br />
-John Muir</p>
<p>On a happier note, today happens to be the 11 year anniversary of the Board of Supervisor's approval of a 1 year trial of bike lanes on Valencia Street(11/6/98). So effectively the Valencia St lanes turned 10 years old today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
