Why Urban Residents Have a Bone to Pick With Vitter and Bennett

In a development that flew largely under the radar on Thursday, the Senate beat back
an attempt by David Vitter (R-LA) and Bob Bennett (R-UT) to add a
citizenship question to the 2010 U.S. Census, with the goal of no
longer counting non-citizens as part of states’ official populations.

sen_vitter.jpgSen. David Vitter (R-LA) (Photo: Chattahbox)

The
Vitter-Bennett proposal would have had a significant effect on the
reapportionment of congressional seats that occurs after every
decennial Census, with independent demographers predicting a loss of five seats for California and one each for New York and Illinois. 

On
the whole, metropolitan areas where immigrants are strongly represented
— think large, blue-state cities — would be disproportionately
impacted. Leaving aside the troubling symbolism of no longer counting
non-citizens,  Vitter-Bennett also would likely cause a major shift in
the distribution of federal transportation funds, a sizable chunk of
which are given out according to population-based formulas.

So urban residents can rest easy knowing that the Senate defeated the Vitter-Bennett plan, right?

Maybe
not. The clash over how the Census should count immigrant residents is
still raging, and Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg said last month that he expects "the Republican assault on the Census and reapportionment" to continue apace.

And
although Vitter-Bennett never came to an up-or-down vote last week,
it’s worth looking at the vote to close off debate on the spending bill
that served as a vehicle for the the Census issue. Every Republican
voted to keep debating the bill, leaving the door open for
Vitter-Bennett to be considered.

  • Mark

    Vitter also voted for unconditional amnesty for married men who like prostitutes to dress them up in diapers. And this guy is a Rhodes Scholar. Cheapens the award, doesn’t it?

  • mcas

    Give Vitter a break– we know he’s for Active Transportation when it comes to running away from people questioning him why he opposes inter-racial marriage, at least…. http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/21/vitter-interracial/

  • Scott

    Vitter is a scumbag, and although he has a fetish to be dressed up in diapers by prostitutes, claims to be “christian.” And a fundamentalist christian at that. Too bad that precludes him from ever believing in Democracy. Fundamentalist christians don’t believe in such a thing.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

How TIGER Transformed Transport Planning — And Lived to Tell About It

|
When the buzz about a new, stimulus-funded, discretionary transportation grant program started to circulate in 2009, some environmentalists opposed it. They worried it would be a slush fund for the Federal Highway Administration, used to build unnecessary roads that would aggravate sprawl and pollution. But insiders knew that wasn’t how the new Obama administration would […]