<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SF Transbay District Plan Offers Lofty Vision for Growth and Livable Streets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/</link>
	<description>Covering San Francisco&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-57701</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=90171#comment-57701</guid>
		<description>Peter, you are confusing the Transbay plan with the Transbay Terminal building. The Transbay plan is about the streets and sidewalks, not about the height of buildings. Plus the plan does provide for bike lanes where possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you are confusing the Transbay plan with the Transbay Terminal building. The Transbay plan is about the streets and sidewalks, not about the height of buildings. Plus the plan does provide for bike lanes where possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamison Wieser</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-57691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamison Wieser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=90171#comment-57691</guid>
		<description>If you read the plan, chapter 4 covers the new bike lanes and chapter 2 addresses the shadows that would be cast by the new towers. Bulk controls and height limits are designed specifically to preserve as much light as possible:

&lt;blockquote&gt;During December and January, the tallest buildings in the Plan area have the potential to shade the heavily used sitting areas along the eastern and northern portions of the plaza, where the only sun is available in the plaza during these months, between noon and 3pm. However, at a height up to 1,000 feet, the Transit Tower would mostly avoid casting shadows on these few sunny seating areas, only clipping the edges.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the plan, chapter 4 covers the new bike lanes and chapter 2 addresses the shadows that would be cast by the new towers. Bulk controls and height limits are designed specifically to preserve as much light as possible:</p>
<blockquote><p>During December and January, the tallest buildings in the Plan area have the potential to shade the heavily used sitting areas along the eastern and northern portions of the plaza, where the only sun is available in the plaza during these months, between noon and 3pm. However, at a height up to 1,000 feet, the Transit Tower would mostly avoid casting shadows on these few sunny seating areas, only clipping the edges.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Smith</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-57661</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=90171#comment-57661</guid>
		<description>no bike lanes, and no sun -- sounds like a &lt;em&gt;great&lt;/em&gt; plan. where do i sign? 

who wants sun in justin herman plaza anyways? eating lunch outside is so overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no bike lanes, and no sun &#8212; sounds like a <em>great</em> plan. where do i sign? </p>
<p>who wants sun in justin herman plaza anyways? eating lunch outside is so overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyface News</title>
		<link>http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/sf-transbay-district-plan-offers-lofty-vision-for-growth-and-livable-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-57581</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyface News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.streetsblog.org/?p=90171#comment-57581</guid>
		<description>Great. Post nice to see it&#039;s the pedestrians who rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Post nice to see it&#8217;s the pedestrians who rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

