The annual powwow of thousands of transportation workers, planners,
and wonks that’s known as the Transportation Research Board (TRB) conference 
kicked off in the capital yesterday with a candid admission from some
senior U.S. DOT officials: reorienting American transport planning to
accommodate the overlap with housing and environmental sustainability
is proving pretty difficult.
subscription-only ClimateWire news service caught remarks from Beth
Osborne, the Obama team’s deputy assistant secretary for transportation
policy, who said the administration’s livability work  has been slowed by laws that impede federal participation in local planning:
"A lot of it [is] the disjointed federal programs that
often discourage and certainly do not incentivize the coordination of
housing policy and transportation policy, water infrastructure policy,
economic development policy," she said.
"In fact, within the
transportation program, we really disincentivize this," she said. A
state that improves traffic flow and transit use will burn less
gasoline, meaning it will lose revenue from its main source of
transport funding — the gas tax. "That state that creates greater
efficiency can see their own budget get slashed as a reward."
This tension between the desire to cut transportation emissions and the
nation’s reliance on the gas tax for the majority of its transport
funding is a familiar one for Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and other
urban members of Congress.
Nadler lamented 
back in June that many states were insisting on a guaranteed rate of
return from their gas-tax revenue based on a nonsensical "equity
argument" that says: "The more energy-efficient you are, the less gas
you use, the less [federal] funding you should get."
ingredient in the Obama administration’s effort to carve out a stronger
federal role in local planning, of course, is the still-stalled 
six-year federal transportation bill. And Osborne — seemingly aware of
the value of that legislation in removing longstanding obstacles to
coordination — told the TRB meeting that "Capitol Hill has asked DOT
to craft its own version of a transportation reauthorization bill,"
according to ClimateWire.
A legislative outline from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who spent much of 2009 urging  lawmakers to put off discussion of the next six-year bill until 2011, would be an undeniable boost to Democrats who have long urged  the administration to play a more active part in solving the puzzle of long-term financing.
But the political hurdles to enacting a new federal transport bill this year remain steep, as ITS America President Scott Belcher  remarked in one of today’s TRB conference sessions.
wants to get past the elections" before passing new long-term
legislation," Belcher said, "and they want to get past the election
because they don’t want to raise taxes."