The Urban Destruction Caused by Parking

Today on the Streetsblog Network, we’re thinking about parking, thanks to a post from The Overhead Wire on the devastating effect that parking structures and highways can have on a city’s infrastructure:

More! That’s the scream of merchants and others who believe that a
downtown without an endless sea of parking is not worth going to. But
once the whole downtown turns into a parking lot it’s not really worth
much anymore, is it? Yet we still see the discussion of parking dominate
without an eye for the destruction that it can cause a downtown if left
unfettered.

To
illustrate, The Overhead Wire’s Jeff Wood uses two aerial views of
Hartford, Connecticut, pre- and post-interstate (the views were part of
a presentation by Dr. Norman Garrick of the University of Connecticut at a recent Congress for the New Urbanism transportation summit).

Hartford1.JPGHartford before the interstate…
Hartford2.JPG…and after. (Photos: via Dr. Norman Garrick)

And yet, as Urban Cincy wrote
earlier this week, cities like Cincinnati are continuing the cycle. By
underfunding transit systems, they make it impossible to get to
downtown without a personal automobile — and create a situation that
demands ever more productive municipal space be sacrificed to parking:

Metro, the non-profit that operates Cincinnati’s bus system, is facing a budget deficit of $16 million
in 2010. To preempt this crisis, officials in December elected to
reduce service on virtually every route, and eliminate some routes
entirely (new schedules).…

Metro’s important role in Cincinnati goes beyond the obvious. For example, there simply is not enough parking downtown to eliminate bus service. If Cincinnati were to eliminate Metro entirely, the city would need 127 acres of additional parking.

According to Carter Dawson, the group that is managing The Banks development on the riverfront, 85,000 people work in downtown Cincinnati, and according to Metro,
20 percent of them commute using the bus. Therefore, 17,000 people ride
to bus downtown to work each day. The amount of space needed for each
parking space is estimated at 325 square feet
after factoring in space needed for access lanes. As a result,
Cincinnati would need to add more than 5.5 million square feet of
additional parking space, or about 127 acres.

Cincinnati
simply cannot afford to throw away 127 acres of prime real estate. Not
only does downtown hold some of the region’s most lucrative businesses
that would have to go elsewhere, but the tax revenue lost by this
displacement would be catastrophic as well. In addition, roadways would
need to be expanded to accommodate the increased traffic, stealing even
more valuable downtown space. Residents would also be displaced, taking
with them the income tax revenue on which the city relies. Cincinnati
cannot afford to eliminate Metro.

More from around the network: Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space on the long-term need to plan for transit "crush loads." Cyclosity on Baltimore’s utter failure to clear its bike paths after the snowstorms. And Tulsa Transportation Examiner on how a Texas town banned bikes because they can’t maintain their roads.

  • I am a great believer in reduced car traffic, less parking and less motorways. Anyone joining me on the dream to a new way of regulating traffic; visit me at http://trafikklogistikk.com which gives 11 wonderful steps to a brighter future.
    see you?
    Knut

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Wooing Suburban Drivers With Cheap Parking: A Losing Strategy for Cities

|
There may be nothing sadder than distressed cities trying to compete with the suburbs by adding more parking spaces. (We’re looking at you, Cleveland, Detroit, and Buffalo!) Chris McCahill and Norman Garrick recently wrote in Atlantic Cities about the failure of this approach: Cities that attempt to use parking as an economic development strategy actually undermine their […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Parking Politics Take a Bite Out of Downtown Raleigh

|
Donald Shoup, the godfather of parking policy, likes to point out that city planners make decisions about parking based on the politics of avoiding on-street parking squabbles, instead of broad public policy concerns like the affordability of housing, the viability of transit, or the health of downtown. Today on the Streetsblog Network, Leo Suarez at […]

So Much Parking It Hurts

|
Today on the Streetsblog Network, Austin Contrarian counts the ways that too much parking can damage a downtown: Photo by Amber Rhea via Flickr. Parking raises the cost of new development, which means less of it. This may be no big deal for a city with a built-out downtown, but it is a big deal […]
STREETSBLOG LA

Donald Shoup Responds to California APA’s Opposition to Parking Reform Bill

|
[Editor’s note: The full letter from Donald Shoup to the American Planning Association on AB 904 can be found after the jump.] In 2004, when the American Institute of Certified Planners inducted Donald Shoup as a fellow — the American Planning Association’s (APA) highest honor — it called the UCLA professor “an academic authority on parking and its effects on […]