Dufty Still Deliberating as Garage Legislation Vote Looms

IMG_1213.jpgPreparing for a new garage addition. Photo: Michael Rhodes

Supervisor Bevan Dufty says he is still considering how he will vote tomorrow on legislation that would limit new garages in existing buildings in Chinatown, North Beach, and Telegraph Hill and eliminate minimum parking requirements in those neighborhoods. Advocates are urging him to support the measure, but Dufty said he’s still deliberating as he continues to receive waves of feedback from supporters and opponents of the plan.

The Board of Supervisors will take a second and final vote tomorrow on the legislation, which passed in a first reading by a 7-2 vote, including an aye from Dufty. Since the Mayor hasn’t come out with a position on the legislation yet, proponents hope Dufty will vote in favor of the legislation again, giving it an eight-vote supermajority in case the Mayor vetoes it. (Supervisor John Avalos was absent from the first vote, but the measure’s supporters are hopeful he will lend his support tomorrow.)

While he voted for the measure on February 9, Dufty said he did so at the time to give it further study before a final vote. He is reportedly being heavily lobbied by garage addition companies and other groups that oppose restrictions on condo-conversions (including the group Plan C, the Examiner reported.)

"I have not decided what I’m going to do, but I definitely plan to talk to David Chiu before mid-morning tomorrow and let him know what my thoughts are," Dufty told Streetsblog today. "I suspected that I was going to have some concerns, and I definitely have concerns."

Chief among those concerns, he said, is whether the legislation is focused on preventing "no fault" Ellis Act evictions in which tenants are evicted to make room for garages. "I don’t fully understand the crafting of the legislation, but if this were focusing on Ellis Acted buildings, I would vote for it in a minute," said Dufty. "But it seems much broader and more complex and convoluted."

Dufty said he’s much less enthusiastic about requiring Conditional Use Authorization for all new garages additions in Chinatown, North Beach and Telegraph Hill, which he
fears would place too great a burden on the Planning Department.

IMG_0870.jpgA sidewalk in Chinatown, which would be covered by the new garage legislation. Photo: Michael Rhodes

The point of the legislation, its supporters say, is to block garages that take space from existing dwelling units, mar historic buildings, or create a worse environment for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Currently, adding a garage is generally allowed in existing residential buildings in the affected neighborhoods, with the burden on opponents of specific garage additions to file a Discretionary Review application to try to block individual garage additions. The new legislation would flip the process, requiring property owners hoping to build new garages in Chinatown, North Beach and Telegraph Hill to seek a Conditional Use Authorization from the Planning Commission.

Installing a garage in an existing building in the area would be permitted as a "conditional use" only if there have been no "no fault" evictions from the building in the past ten years. Garage additions would also need to conform with the Better Streets Policy, and wouldn’t be allowed to decrease sidewalk accessibility or front on a public right-of-way narrower than 41 feet.

The legislation would also eliminate minimum off-street parking requirements for residential uses and institute a maximum parking cap in the Broadway Neighborhood Commercial District, North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District, and the Chinatown Mixed Use and Community Business Districts.

"He certainly supported it on the first vote, but apparently he’s being lobbied by SF Garage, the people who stick garages into buildings, because it will make it harder to put garages into buildings in a corner of the city," said Tom Radulovich, Executive Director of Livable City, one of the legislation’s principal supporters, along with the Chinatown Community Development Center (CCDC) and Telegraph Hill Dwellers.

Legislation Could Make it Easier to Convert Space to Dwelling Units

Radulovich said that by eliminating the minimum parking requirement for new units in the zone covered by the legislation, it would be easier for property owners to convert underutilized garage space into living quarters, since it wouldn’t be necessary to include a parking space for the newly carved-out unit.

"If you don’t exceed the density limit, which does not change, units which meet those limits but that are otherwise code legal would be permitted," he said. "We hope it would help with the legalization of some units which are there and occupied that don’t exceed the density limits."

That, said Radulovich, could actually provide building owners with greater flexibility to build new in-law units in existing buildings, especially when they’re already spending money on seismic retrofitting. That could mean new business for the very garage-addition companies that are lobbying Dufty not to support the measure, he said.

"We’re hoping for a very healthy business for SF Garage Co., but not necessarily always installing garages," he added.

Dufty said he’s not in a position to comment on the potential for converting non-dwelling space to living units, an issue he said is best answered by the Planning Department. (Planning Director John Rahaim couldn’t be reached for comment.)

Dufty planned to meet with the City Attorney Monday afternoon, and said he has spoken with CCDC about the legislation. The measure moved through the legislative process very quickly, he said, and he’s still hoping to pin down whether it is primarily about preventing Ellis Act evictions, or if it has other consequences he wouldn’t support.

"I’m just not sure how openly recognized this issue was, and then all of a sudden it seems like it’s a firestorm and I’m kind of looking around and going, wow, this isn’t as cut-and-dried as it appeared to be," said Dufty.

The legislation’s supporters have stressed that it is not intended as
a first step towards a citywide restriction on garages, but rather
addresses a specific issue in District 3, where tenants have frequently
been evicted to make room for new garages.

You can contact Supervisor Dufty’s office about the legislation by email at Bevan.Dufty@sfgov.org or by phone at (415) 554-6968. The Board of Supervisors vote on the legislation is tomorrow, February 22, at City Hall, Room 200, during the regular 2 p.m. full Board meeting.

  • Nick

    Has there been any discussion as to how this may further the local phenomenon of “for rent” parking spaces on the sidewalk in front of private buildings? Craigslist has them at $250-300 a month in some of the denser neighborhoods in the city. So much for legislating livability.

  • The more I read about Bevan Dufty’s inability to be decisive, the less inclined I am to vote for him for mayor.

  • Robo

    Don’t vote for Dufty for Mayor. He’s spent most of his career being Gavin Newsom’s sockpuppet. He’ll probably vote against the legislation.

  • andrew

    And no mention of property rights. Of course.

  • Richard Mlynarik

    I can’t imagine that anybody can identify an instance in which my district 8
    representative, Gavin “Willie’s Boy” Dufty, aka Bevan Brown, has,
    when there as ever been the slightest whiff of developer money at stake,
    ever once voted in the interests of his constituents.

  • That developer money is property rights. The future of the city be damned. Der’s money in ‘dem ‘der hills.

  • Park This

    Come on Dufty! The livable streets constituency is watching you on this one.

  • Concerned North Beach resident

    sooooooo … what happened? I can’t find results posted anywhere.

  • @Concerned North Beach resident – What are you concerned about? I’d love to hear some of your opinions.

  • Concerned North Beach resident

    The comments I’ve seen most often in favor of this either focus on not replacing homes with garages or emphasizing the transit options in favor of discouraging cars.

    Both are well-intentioned, but simplistic.

    This legislation does not simply ban a garage permit if a unit is being eliminated. I’m not sure if people realize that any garage permit already has to go to the very un-car friendly Telegraph Hill Dwellers Assocn and they can reject it. Even if you’ve never evicted a tenant, this will make the process far more cumbersome and expensive. There’s no provision in the current legislation for people who bought even years after tenants were evicted and after the speculators made their money. Plus, adding a garage requires massive seismic upgrades and sprinklers which make the building structurally safer.

    Second, a car-friendly nirvanna sounds great. And it works for some people. Until you put down roots in a neighborhood and have kids and want them to go to public school and learn about the lottery and that geographic proximity is not considered a factor in assinging schools. Parents are up in arms wanting “walkability” to local schools and that is not a priority for our progressive city. Even the so-called attendance zones do not take into account proximity.

    That’s just one example, but with a disabled husband and a child that will soon be in school we have to have a car. Right now we pay for parking, but would like to add a garage in our building. We can afford it, and would like to replace our brick foundation, add window boxes and greenery, etc.

    There are plenty of people ranting in both directions, and the Jasper street building is an extreme and unfortunate example. It’s all very frustrating.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Board of Supervisors Delays Vote on Garage Legislation

|
Supervisor Bevan Dufty. The Board of Supervisors has delayed a vote on legislation that would limit new garages in Chinatown, North Beach and Telegraph Hill for two weeks. After approving the legislation on first reading by a 7-2 vote on February 9, the supervisors voted today to continue the measure until March 9, a move […]

Supervisors to Take Final Vote on Garage Legislation Tomorrow

|
Flickr photo: ChazWags The Board of Supervisors will vote tomorrow on legislation that would limit new garages in Chinatown, North Beach and Telegraph Hill. After approving the legislation on first reading by a 7-2 vote on February 9, the supervisors voted on February 23 to continue the measure until tomorrow. Supervisor Bevan Dufty, whose vote […]

Streetscast: An Interview with New TA Chair Bevan Dufty

|
Supervisor Bevan Dufty aboard a streetcar recently named in honor of gay civil rights legend Harvey Milk. District 8 Supervisor Bevan Dufty was elected the chairman of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (TA) this week, rounding up the necessary six votes to beat District 6 Supervisor Chris Daly. It’s a position Dufty says he’s […]

Legislation to Limit Garages in North Beach and Chinatown Moves Forward

|
Photo: Postmodern Drunkard When San Francisco Board of Supervisors President David Chiu introduced legislation last October to limit new garages in existing buildings in District 3, which includes North Beach, Telegraph Hill, and Chinatown, his action catalyzed several advocacy groups that don’t always see eye to eye. The bill is aimed at stopping no-fault evictions […]