The Rationale for No Parking: A Q&A With the 1050 Valencia St. Developer

1050_Valencia_current.jpgThe site of the contentious new development and current home of Spork Restaurant. Photos: Shizuo Holding Trust.

Last week we reported on the proposed 5-story development at 1050 Valencia Street, on the corner of Hill street and the current location of Spork Restaurant, which stimulated a lot of reader comments.

While the project would add 16 units, the project sponsor doesn’t plan on building any parking, a sticking point that has nearby neighbors upset. Those neighbors appealed the Planning Department staff’s initial approval of the project, arguing that the new building doesn’t fit the context of the neighborhood and that it doesn’t fit at the edge of the Liberty Hill Historic District.

Elizabeth Zitrin, a neighbor who filed the appeal, said the project was out of context with the neighborhood.

"What might be appropriate for the heart of the district, completely surrounded by a commercial zone, is not appropriate for this fragile edge of the Liberty Hill Historic district, where its going to be so much bigger, where it’s going to have multiple negative impacts on this historic resource and residential neighborhood," she said.

Peter Heinicke, another neighbor who testified against the project at the Planning Commission last week, said he was concerned with the character of the building, the height and bulk and the lack of parking in a neighborhood he argued wasn’t transit rich.

"The effect is I think someone who lives there is likely going to have a
car. They may not drive it all the time, but they’re going to need to
have it and they’re going to need to park it somewhere, even if they
take BART into work," said Heinicke.

We reached out to Mark Rutherford, the developer of 1050 Valencia, and asked him about the dust up with the neighbors and why he would bring a project forward without parking, especially when most developments seek exceptions to add the upper limit of parking whenever possible. 

Hill_street_view.jpgThe view down Hill Street toward Valencia. As a comparison, a 4-story building on Valencia can be seen on the left of the photo.

Matthew Roth: Why did you choose not to build parking on the site for the residences?

Mark Rutherford: We would rather build housing and restaurant space than parking, and coincidentally that’s what the Mission Plan calls for: maximum unit density, no parking and ground floor retail.

Roth: Do you expect the residents will be attracted to the site because they won’t be car owners?

Rutherford: We see affordability, location and green construction as the major draws. However, there is definitely an emerging urban aesthetic where people take pride in living a car-free lifestyle. The Valencia Street transit corridor epitomizes that way of life.

Roth: Are there cost savings associated with not building a garage that you can pass on to the units?

Rutherford: There is a cost savings, but only if you are allowed to build to the site’s full potential. If the unit density and mix are watered down by political pressure, the savings evaporate.

Roth: What do you think of the appeal from the Liberty Hill Neighbors and do you think they have standing?

Rutherford: The community has every right to have input into what goes on in their neighborhood and you wouldn’t want to live any place where it didn’t. However, abusing the appeal process puts legitimate projects in jeopardy and deprives the City of jobs and affordable housing, not to mention tax revenue. Still, we’re confident that it will work out for everyone.

Roth: Do you think the issue is the context of the building or the parking?

Rutherford: I have no idea what the real issue is. Our project is perfect for that corner.

Roth: Some advocates and affordable housing proponents have said projects like this should be supported so that other developers are encouraged to provide housing without parking in other areas of town. Do you see this kind of development as being a trend?

Rutherford: It’s definitely the future. No one in their right mind believes a car-centric urban model is sustainable, which is why so many garages are converted to in-laws in this City.

Roth: Is it hard to find financing for a project without parking like this?

Rutherford: It’s hard to find financing for any project right now.

  • Judith

    Murphstahoe, these are NOT going to be condos. They will be rental units.

    Family-friendliness is also a city mandate and 400 square foot studios, some small 1 BRs and a couple of very small 2BRs is NOT family-friendly.

    This is 100% about cramming in as many people as possible on this small lot. ALL of the condos being built in the area have parking.

    This developer and the Planning Department KNOW these tenants will have cars. The developer just wants someone other than him to pay the cost of accommodating those cars.

  • Judith, I don’t own a car. Many people in this city don’t own cars. Are we suppose to support your need for cheap available on-street parking? Obviously your concern is extremely self-centered.

    Ric, when I go out to eat I take the bus, walk, or bike. I’m sure many many people on Valencia and in the Mission do the same. I’d agree not all of them, but a large majority. Plus, many of those people are drinking while having dinner, do we want to continue to make it easy for them to hop back behind the wheel of a car while other modes suffer?

  • ric

    mikesonn, Just take a look at the reality, people drive from all over to get to this neighborhood. Check it out in the evenings, cars are all over going round and round looking for parking so they can go to all the businesses here. They park on corners, park in the middle of the street, double park. They honk hit people and things. They pollute visually and environmentally. This new building wants an expanded restaurant plus 16 units of housing that means more cars more people more congestion. Oh and the service entrance for this enlarged restaurant will be on Hill Street, not a commercial street a quiet residential street. This is about quality of life and this proposed monster building does nothing to improve quality but only brings more people, more congestion and yes more cars into this neighborhood. That’s the reality. This planned FIVE STORY Eye Sore is a simple plan of greed to yank as much possible profit out of a fixed space without care or consideration to it’s impact nor any care of being responsible in the least. That’s reality.

  • @ric – reality bites.

  • patrick

    oh my god, it’s FIVE STORIES!! It’s so big, if there’s an earthquake it is guaranteed to fall over and crush all of San Francisco.

  • ric

    It’s interesting to read this now, July 2013, the affordable element was a lie, the fact that they were building affordable rental units, the truth is that they will be building expensive condos, not rentals, which will have the effect of further increasing the price for the limited rental units in the area. This developer has continually been deceptive to the neighbors and their concerns.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Proposed Developments Illustrate San Francisco’s Parking Dilemma

|
A simulation of the proposed discount mall on Market Street, City Place. Image: Urban Realty. At another marathon Planning Commission meeting last week, parking was all the rage. Two projects in particular had community members and housing and transit advocates fired up because of the parking that developers proposed to build, or in one case, […]

Planning Commission Approves Parking-Free 1050 Valencia Project

|
A car-free, 12-unit condo and retail development was approved unanimously yesterday by the SF Planning Commission, despite opposition from some residents. The project will include no car parking and 28 bike parking spaces. The building at 1050 Valencia Street will be targeted toward residents seeking the kind of car-free lifestyle that’s increasingly popular in neighborhoods like the […]

Appeals Board Reverses Vote to Downsize Parking-Free 1050 Valencia

|
The San Francsco Board of Appeals voted yesterday to reverse its decision to downsize the long-embattled condo project at 1050 Valencia Street in the Mission. The project includes no car parking and one bike parking space for each unit. The vote restores the full 12 units approved by the Planning Department and Board of Supervisors. The Appeals […]

800-Seat Performance Space in Hayes Valley Approved with No Parking

|
A sketch of the proposed SF Jazz building and with performance auditorium. Image: SF Jazz. The same neighborhood organizations and community advocates that routinely lobby to prevent the San Francisco Planning Department from granting parking exceptions in excess of progressive neighborhood plans were thrilled with a new project to build a 3-story building in the […]

Commentary: Parking Over Patients in New St. Luke’s Hospital Plan

|
Fran Taylor contributes occasionally to Streetsblog San Francisco and wrote this Op-Ed on the CPMC plans for rebuilding the St. Luke’s Hospital in the Mission near where she lives. An ambitious plan to overhaul hospital operations throughout the California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC)/Sutter system in San Francisco has stirred up controversy on a number of […]