Today’s Headlines

  • California Would Face $1.25 Billion Cut Under Mica Transpo Bill (SF Gate)
  • SF Park Program Issues First Pricing Adjustment (City Insider)
  • SF Taxi Drivers Still Planning August 2 Strike (SF Examiner)
  • Park Merced Opponents Submit Signatures for Referendum (SF Gate)
  • CMPC, City “Still Far Apart on Cathedral Hill Facility” (SF Examiner)
  • Beyond Chron: “Is CPMC Having Second Thoughts About SF Project?”
  • Enviros Blast Halting of Clean Air Program for America’s Cup (SFBG)
  • Proposed Development at 15th/South Van Ness “Raises Hackles” (Mission Loc@l)
  • LA Times Does a Travel Piece on “San Francisco’s Valencia Street on Bicycle”
  • Redevelopment Agencies “Must Pay to Stay in Business” (Sac Bee)
  • SF Redevelopment Agency “Tries to Stay Alive” (SF Examiner)
  • “Peer Review Group” Raises “Serious Concerns” About CAHSR (AP via Merc)
  • SF Supes Close to Decision on AT&T Sidewalk Utility Boxes (Andrew Ross)

More headlines at Streetsblog Capitol Hill

  • While in general I applaud raising parking rates in congested areas, I don’t really see how the variable pricing component is likely to bring much gain. The average person is not going to consult a website or their iphone before heading out to a particular section of the city.  They are not likely to know the rate at a meter before they actually park.  Only after they park will they see the rate, and think (perhaps) “Holy cow, this is too high!  I’m not parking here again.”  However, having found a coveted parking spot in a congested area and then successfully parallel parked, few will leave that spot in price shock in order to find a cheaper spot unless they are relying on cash and just don’t have the quarters.

    In addition, most people are unlikely to know that a cheaper spot is available a block or two away. Unless there is a lot of publicity, they are also unlikely to know the spot is cheaper in the mornings than in the afternoons and evenings. It seems to me that variable pricing only works to change driver behavior if the majority of drivers have the latest, up-to-date knowledge of the pricing structure. Assuming everyone is going whip out their iphone and get that info is not exactly realistic, especially since, legally, they would have to find an empty spot to pullover and stop in in order to check said iphone.

  • guest

    Earlier, they said they’d put up variable signs indicating the price on each block. That’d make the program more effective.

  • Anonymous

    One thing that could help is if the rates on street parking go up, but the rates in public garages stagnate. If word gets out that “garages are cheaper” I think a lot of people will go to garages first, which will free up spaces on the street for convenience-seekers.

  • People generally follow the same routine every day. Many times meters are occupied not by customers, but by employees that feed the meter all day. This gets those people to park elsewhere, like a garage.

    The average person is not a tourist from Sacramento that visits every 6 months, its a person who does the same thing every single day.

    And even the tourist, after parking and seeing “$5 an hour” is likely to move to the garage across the street that charges a $20 flat rate.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
More on Mayor Lee’s Street Improvement Bond Measure (SF Gate, SF Appeal) Board of Supes Unanimously Confirms Joél Ramos to SFMTA Board (SF Examiner) SFMTA Seeks to Streamline Disciplinary Process for Muni Operators (SF Examiner) SFMTA Board Votes to Raise Taxi Fares (SF Examiner, SF Gate, SF Appeal, ABC 7, AP via SacBee) Bay Bridge Drivers Will Be Detoured […]

Today’s Headlines

|
SFMTA to Boost Parking Citation Efforts to Make Up for Lost Revenue (City Insider) Bay Citizen: “Will High-Speed Rail Get Sick with BART Syndrome?” Pedestrian Killed by VTA Light-Rail Train Identified (Mercury News) Is Jerry Brown About to Propose Eliminating Redevelopment Agencies? (Sac Bee, San Diego.org) Word of Brown’s Idea is “Sending Shockwaves” Through Local […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Overtime Pay “Still Draining” the SFMTA’s Budget (SF Examiner) Housing Master Plan Before the SF Planning Commission Today (SF Gate) Bike About Town: “Family Cycling: “Chance to Bond, Teach Kids Safety” Oakland Bike Program Launches Photo Contest (Living in the O) Novato Moves to Secure Redevelopment Funds (Marin IJ) Mountain Bikes v Equestrians Debate Pops […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Study Commissioned by Siemens Names SF “Greenest City” (City Insider) Mercury News: “Redevelopment Agencies Ponder the Budget Ax” Bills Eliminating Redevelopment Agencies Likely to Be Tied Up in Court (Bay Citizen) Caltrain Operators “Know Collisions Are a Certainty” (SF Examiner) Transit Fares and Bridge Tolls Are Set to Rise on Friday (SF Gate) Supervisor Scott […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Muni Drivers Authorize Strike; City Responds (City Insider, SF Appeal, SF Examiner) Cole Valley Alley: Muni Management Continues to Fail the Public GG Bridge District Votes to Raise Ferry and Bus Fares (BCN via Merc, Marin IJ) BART Seeks Riders Opinions on Train Upgrades (SF Examiner) 5-3 Vote to Keep Caltrain Service was a North-South […]

Today’s Headlines

|
SFMTA Board Could Pick a New CEO as Early as Today (SF Gate) BART Officials Dispel Rumors That Ford Could Be GM (SF Examiner) SFMTA, SFPD to Address Bus Shelter Safety Concerns in TL (SF Examiner) Curt Pringle Resigns from Calif. HSR Board (Mercury News) San Jose, League of Cities File Suit Over Redevelopment Agencies […]