New Designs to Be Presented for Eastern Cesar Chavez Street

The pedestrian environment on eastern Cesar Chavez Street is in desperate need of improvement. Photo: SF Planning Department

New designs have been drawn up for eastern Cesar Chavez Street and will be presented to the community next week, nearly two months after a contentious meeting in which attendees were told, just days before the striping of new bike lanes, that plans for a road diet were being scrapped by the Mayor’s Office and Port of San Francisco because of concerns from industrial businesses about reducing road capacity for trucks hauling goods.

The new designs will not be made public until the August 24 meeting, where options for short-term and long-term plans will be presented. Sources who have seen the designs say the short-term plan does not remove a travel lane like the original plan. Instead, it would remove parking to add one-way protected bike lanes on both the north and south sides. The short-term plan is part of an air quality grant to improve biking and would not change the sidewalks.

“The plan that was going to go out in July was going to put a bike lane between a parking lane and a bunch of trucks,” said Peter Albert, the manager of urban planning initiatives at the SFMTA. “It seems like the low hanging fruit in that whole thing was the on-street parking, so why was on-street parking for basically two dozen spaces so sacrosanct that it was forcing bicyclists to pit themselves against trucks and buses?”

Under the new designs, he said, “the bike experience is much better because you’ve got no parked cars or dooring to the right, you’ve got complete clarity on your path and the trucks don’t have to intersect with you in any way.”

The Problem with Evans

The tricky part is where Cesar Chavez intersects with Evans Avenue and turns from four lanes into five lanes. There are two options for what to do at that hairy intersection in the short-term plan.

The first would get bicyclists through the intersection by removing a westbound lane on a 600-foot stretch of Cesar Chavez just west of Evans and east of Connecticut. That would leave enough room to paint protected bike lanes, and when compared to the original Bike Plan proposal, would slightly improve traffic flow for autos. The less-than-ideal option for the intersection, which is sure to encounter opposition from bicyclists, would not include any bike lanes, and only use sharrows to guide bicyclists through. Walking advocates don’t like this option either, as it leaves no room to widen the woefully inadequate sidewalk pictured above.

The long-term proposals, part of the Eastern Cesar Chavez Community Design Plan — which covers Cesar Chavez from Hampshire to Illinois — offer a better solution. The Planning Department is proposing a cantilevered path to widen Cesar Chavez Street around the Evans Avenue intersection to accommodate a total of 4 lanes of traffic, bike lanes, and sidewalks. They also plan to present proposals for a two-way protected green cycletrack with a six-foot buffer, and another option that would offer one-way protected green bike lanes on the north and south sides with six-foot buffers.

Pedestrians Won’t See Immediate Improvements

This is what pedestrians currently have to contend with on Cesar Chavez near Mississippi. Photo: SF Planning Dept.

The new drawings for short-term options don’t address the skinny sidewalks because, unlike the road diet that was originally envisioned, the eastbound lane on eastern Cesar Chavez would not be removed. Without doing that, there is little room left on the 59-foot wide street to expand the sidewalks and build bike lanes.

Albert said a $79,000 Bay Area Quality Management District grant being used to re-stripe Cesar Chavez isn’t meant to cover widening sidewalks, but the paint will serve “as a footprint of a road we’d like to be much better in the long-term.”

“I’m confident that either one of [the short-term options] is vastly better than what we’re living with right now,” he said.

“The sidewalk has got to be fixed. In the near term, at the bare minimum, the bike lane project should set the stage for improving walking conditions,” said Elizabeth Stampe, the executive director of Walk San Francisco.

Albert said he definitely “wants to revisit with the community this whole idea of a transit line along Cesar Chavez,” and that that’s one reason why removing a traffic lane along the entire stretch doesn’t make sense right now.

Trucks, Private Autos and Pollution

The June community meeting where the audience was told the road diet was being taken off the table failed to directly relay what the underlying issue was:  industrial businesses expressing concerns that reducing road capacity would increase congestion and hurt their bottom line. David Beaupre, a senior planner at the Port of San Francisco, repeated this concern in an interview with Streetsblog yesterday.

“If we start to impact the capacity of Cesar Chavez it’s going to negatively impact the economic opportunities to that part of the city,” he explained. “It’s going to begin to push those types of businesses out of the city, which means, you know, the food distribution, the auto repair shops, the cleaning services, and people are going to have to start driving more to get their services in south city or wherever.”

Beaupre acknowledges, however, that the majority of traffic on Cesar Chavez is not trucks, but private automobiles, but said eliminating a lane could impact the transit option, because”Muni can’t run if there’s only one lane.”

As a general rule, traffic engineers consider 2 percent of all vehicle traffic to be heavy traffic, or trucks and buses. Sources told Streetsblog the SFMTA was currently gathering comprehensive traffic flow data on eastern Cesar Chavez that should give everyone a clearer idea of the traffic make-up. It’s expected to be presented at next week’s meeting.

Beaupre also expressed a concern that reducing the capacity would create more pollution because of idling trucks, and force them to divert onto quieter neighborhood streets in the Bayview. But Peggy da Silva, the educating and training manager at Veritable Vegetable, which is located on Cesar Chavez and uses a fleet of trucks to haul organic produce, said trucks face tighter air control regulations than private automobiles.

“There’s a lack of understanding in the community about trucks. People think, because they’re big, that they pollute more and they don’t necessarily. Professional drivers are also probably less of a risk to people than, you know, your average person driving down the street,” da Silva said.

The project area. Image: SF Planning Dept.

Reducing Private Auto Traffic

Da Silva said the city should prioritize the movement of goods on Cesar Chavez by reducing private vehicle traffic on the street, which would reduce air pollution and the risk of injury and “support the health of our re-emerging industrial sector in Southeast San Francisco.”

“We don’t want the trucks idling. I think that’s an agreement for all of us. Therefore, we need to make sure that the essential vehicles on this street can move,” said da Silva.

Albert, the SFMTA official, called the latest designs breakthroughs, and said he hopes the August 24 meeting can move beyond “pitting trucks against buses against bikes against pedestrians.”

“It gives us the opportunity to pilot a much better environment,” Albert said. “If it works really well, if we manage the congestion, we provide the bikes their protected path, then we can come back with confidence and say this works for the community, everybody likes this better, let’s go back and find the capital funding to make the pedestrian improvements substantial.”

The community meeting on Eastern Cesar Chavez will be held Wednesday, August 24th from 6-8 p.m. in the community room of the Good Samaritan Family Resource Center at 1294 Potrero Avenue. Download the flyer here [pdf].

  • Fran Taylor

    Why am I suspicious? Could it be Recology’s role in the Mayor’s Office? Or the last-minute inclusion of Pier 80, way to the south of everything else involved, in the America’s Cup plan? Or is it all that market rate housing slated for southeastern San Francisco that will likely fill up with private vehicle drivers? I’m trying to keep an open mind, but the sudden concern for cyclists riding in an unbuffered lane and interest in a potential Muni line are setting off my cynic-o-meter.
     
    For those who missed that earlier contentious meeting, here’s a short video interpretation. Advocates appear first, followed by the city’s power brokers.
     

  • guest

    I just really hope they are resurfacing before striping bike lanes. Biking from the 22nd St Caltrain Station at night is a nightmare… 

  • Anonymous

    One of those professional drivers sped by myself and one other cyclist to dart in front of us dangerously into the right turn pocket from SB Pennslyvania onto WB Cesar Chavez this afternoon. At which point they had to stop to yield for cars that might injure *them*.

    The irony of the sign on the back of the truck “HOW AM I DRIVING” – with a truck ID and 1-888 number was no comfort. “SAFETY IS OUR PRIORITY”.

    The drivers priority was to slam on the accelerator and weave through traffic when he noticed us pulling out our cellphones to take a photo of the
    bumper sticker. I got the ID but not the 1-888 number.

    The trucks on Chavez are much more aggressive than the private vehicles, especially at the right turn onto Evans.

  • Anonymous

    Fran – I fully intend to show up to a Mayoral debate and ask Lee to justify the change in plans and ask the others if they agree. For Noe/Bernal/Glen/Mission this is over 1000 cycling trips daily just from Caltrain boardings at 22nd. And currently a lot of us waste 15 minutes of our day riding to 4th because Chavez is so dicey.

  • Odm2

    Talk about ignoring the elephant in the room (private autos).

  • Anonymous

    Agreed. I would say approximately 1/3 to 1/2 of the times I’ve been buzzed on this stretch of Cesar Chavez (which I ride ~ half a dozen times weekly) have been huge trucks. I even caught up to one at a light after he buzzed me (nearly missing me by no more than a few inches) and told him how close he had come to me, and he was a unsympathetic jerk saying I was in the road and blocking his way (where the hell am I supposed to be? And he had an entire other lane that was empty which he could have moved over into since there were no cars there). And I’ve also noticed the aggression at the intersection with Evans. So I totally disagree that truck drivers are “professional”; if anything, they seem to feel more entitled to the road than anybody … and the recent shoot-down of the road diet as delivered by the industry representatives confirms this: they think their profit margins trump the basic right to safety to which all bicyclists and pedestrians are entitled.

  • Joshconlun

    Chavez is a miserable place to ride a bike, so few people do it and they drive instead.  Providing a world-class bike facility would actually get people out of their cars, reducing congestion and pollution.

  • LWilson

    Why the big urge to eliminate the private autos?  It sounds like there is a way to accommodate 4 lanes of traffic plus pedestrians and bikes; so why the urge for a “road diet”.
    People seem to be unaware that drivers use this stretch to get to and from 101 or 280 or just to the other side of the City.  There are often just not public transit options to the final destinations and biking meets the needs of only a small minority.
    Reducing traffic lanes on CC will not get people out of there cars — it will just create congestion or force drivers to take less convenient and efficient routes.  Who wins with that?
    I understand that many of the commentators on this blog see any street improvement as an opportunity to punish evil drivers.  But you might consider the needs of your fellow citizens (since you spend so much time demanding that your needs be considered).

  • What?

    When I ride on Cesar Chavez, at least 10% if not more, of the traffic is cyclists. Chavez is not congested at this section now, and taking a lane out would not cause congestion. There are 2 lights on this stretch – Evans and Pennslyvania. I have *never* seen a car fail to make a light cycle in 15 years of riding this stretch, due to traffic. The light cycles are required for cross traffic.

    This is fearmongering from the “trucks”. The cost to them for settling a case of wrongful death if they kill a cyclist (and the cost to the City who would be sued for delaying this project) would far outweigh their theoretical economic costs.

    If there was an actual problem here, we’d listen. Characterizing the people who want street improvements as people out to “punish evil drivers” is bull. But it sure plays well in the press, don’t it?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SFMTA Adds Green Treatments, Posts to Eastern Cesar Chavez Bike Lanes

|
The SF Municipal Transportation Agency added “safe-hit” posts and dashed green pavement treatments to the bike lanes on eastern Cesar Chavez Street this week between Vermont and Pennsylvania streets. The new additions should improve the sense of separation, safety and visibility for people using the bike lanes, which were installed this spring. The bike lanes replaced […]

Detailed Polk Street Designs: Plans for Safe Bicycling Still “Lackluster”

|
The SFMTA and the Planning Department presented detailed plans for Polk Street at the project’s final open house meeting yesterday. The new aspects include specific locations of bulb-outs, dedicated bicycle signals, left turn prohibitions, loading zones, and new trees and landscaping. Plans to improve bicycle infrastructure are still composed of a mix of protected, buffered, […]