SFMTA and DPW Drop the Ball on Second Street Safety Project

One section of the faltered plan for Second Street. Image: SFDPW

A plan for streetscape improvements on Second Street has faltered after the city agencies overseeing it neglected to implement them before dedicated funds expired.

The project that won’t receive the funds is a package including bike lanes, pedestrian safety improvements, and road repaving on Second Street between Market and King Streets.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors, acting as the SF County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) Board, approved a measure today redistributing the expiring $4.8 million in federal funds to three other projects in order to avoid forfeiting them.

The Department of Public Works (DPW) and the SFMTA “failed to steer the project toward successful implementation,” states a memo from DPW Director Mohammed Nuru and SFMTA Director of Transportation Ed Reiskin to Jane Kim, supervisor of District 6, which includes Second Street. “While we are deeply disappointed that the project has stalled at this juncture, we want to assure you that both DPW and SFMTA are dedicated to implementing this project in the near future.”

The SFCTA, which oversees transportation financing in San Francisco, approved the funds in 2010 from a federal Congestion Management Agency Block Grant. That grant was awarded on the condition that it be spent by February 1, 2012.

But in what the SFCTA called a “surprise,” the SFMTA and DPW failed to meet that deadline after a series of communication breakdowns between the agencies. The SFCTA board called today’s special last-minute hearing to vote on a new plan to divert the funds.

According to an SFCTA document [PDF], $3.4 million of the diverted funds will go to the Cesar Chavez Streetscape Improvement Project, $948,200 to the Two-Way Haight Street Project, and $529,815 to add overhead SFGo signs on Second Street — a program aimed at facilitating wayfinding for drivers which has faced criticism for making city streets look more like freeways.

The memo details a long sequence of bureaucratic tangles, including the agencies’ failure to finish revising plans for the bike lanes on Second in response to public feedback. The bike lanes are one of 11 SF Bike Plan projects not initially greenlighted by the SFMTA Board of Directors. The SFMTA’s project revisions stalled in 2009, and DPW’s project manager was not aware the bike lanes have not been legislated.

Biking and walking advocates said that regardless of the merit of the projects now receiving the funding, the redistribution sets a dangerous precedent for protecting dedicated funds.

“While it’s a relief that city leaders are committing to advance critical pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements on Second Street, we are still deeply concerned that nearly $5 million could almost fall through the cracks,” said Leah Shahum, executive director of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition. “This should be an urgent wake-up call that city leaders must do a better job of prioritizing pedestrian and bicycle projects and working together for safer streets. As someone who worked hard to pass the [Proposition B] streets bond last fall, I worry about the city’s readiness to deliver on tens of millions of dollars of pedestrian and bicycle projects that people are clamoring for.”

Staffers from the three agencies said they were working on a new plan to fund the Second Street project, which may now cost as much as $8 million, “depend[ing] on the desired level of bike improvements that come out of the planning phase,” according to the memo. Potential funding sources include the Prop B street improvements bond, Proposition AA (a local vehicle license fee), and the federal One Bay Area Grant. Staff said they are continuing the public outreach process, and the new timeline sets project completion at no sooner than 2015.

“This isn’t about picking one project over the other,” said Manish Champsee, policy chair of Walk SF’s Board of Directors. “However, I do think there is a contract, if you will, between public agencies and the public, that when the public is promised something such as pedestrian safety and walkability improvements, that those improvements do get made.”

  • Mark

    I was wondering what had happened to this project.  Now I know.  Wow, this really makes me angry.  I live at roughly Brannan and Second and regularly ride Townsend to Fifth or even Seventh to get downtown because they all have either lanes or sharrows.  Riding down Second would be perfect for me if the pavement was better and there was a modicum of bike/car separation.  Having this project further delayed just sucks!

  • Shame on the DPW and SFMTA. Here was a chance to make a significant improvement for non-auto modes in an area that sorely needs them, and they blew it.

  • JimBeam

    So they forgot about the bike lanes and are diverting the funds for overhead signs which is an amenity for drivers.  A sad day for the city.

  • This is most likely just the first project of many to be intentionally delayed until it is off the radar and then suddenly, poof, it can’t be done because there is no money. Next projects to get this treatment are likely to be Oak/Fell bike paths (implementation already delayed 1 1/2 years to emphasize free parking over safety), Masonic (gee, just too complicated), and Geary and Van Ness BRT (golly, all the money was sucked into the black hole of the Central Subway to nowhere). Just pathetic.

  • mikesonn

    We have to keep it on the radar.

    Also, what is it with the city being completely against ANY pedestrian safety improvements in SoMa?

  • Justin

    I used to bike regularly on Second between Market and Brannan and found that just riding down the middle of the lane was the only safe way to do it. Surprisingly, drivers were ok with this — way more so than they are on streets with bike lanes when you have to ride in the car lane because someone is parked in the bike lane. I don’t know why everyone celebrates bike lanes so much since they are usually blocked more often than they are open (think Townsend and Valencia). Unless they are protected lanes or there is zero-tolerance for double parking, I am in favor of no bike lanes at all, and will gladly take up the whole lane. 

    Cyclists who hug parked cars are doing themselves and other bikers a disservice — they encourage drivers to swerve around them without changing lanes, and reinforce the idea that bikes are in the way. 

  • @mikesonn:disqus because SOMA is just a means to get on or off the freeways, and we can’t interfere with that.

  • mikesonn

    @72562d2e1fb45be3e000db0b5a81dc59:disqus “Unless they are protected lanes”

    I can’t tell you how many times the lanes on Market are blocked. I don’t ride Market often, but when I do I usually don’t get to ride the green.

  • Ride It Like You Stole It

    “…intentionally delayed…”  That’s quite a little conspiracy theory.

  • Elfreda Huffer

    Simply amazing article! I need help with this too! BTW, there is an online service through which you can fill out a a form, the fillable blank is here http://goo.gl/b05L1p

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Protected Bike Lanes, Ped Safety Top Priorities for Second Street Neighbors

|
Safe bike lanes and pedestrian crossings should be top priorities in the redesign of Second Street. That was the major sentiment at a community meeting on Wednesday, where city staffers rebooting the faltered Second Street Improvement Project asked attendees how they would re-envision the corridor. The residents who attended worked in small groups. Of the 12 […]

Planners Refine Ped Upgrades, Protected Bike Lane Designs for Second Street

|
The developing plan to overhaul Second Street with protected bike lanes and pedestrian safety upgrades took another step forward yesterday when staff from the SF Municipal Transportation Agency, the Department of Public Works, and the Planning Department presented more refined design options to the public. Under the proposal, the entire one-mile length of Second Street would be […]

Protected Bike Lanes, Ped Safety Upgrades Proposed for Second Street

|
Second Street could get protected bike lanes, sidewalk extensions, lane reductions, greening and more under options presented to residents last night by the SF Department of Public Works and the Municipal Transportation Agency. Of the four options presented, one would include one-way protected bike lanes (or “cycle tracks”), and another would include a two-way protected […]