SamTrans Poll Shows Strong Support for Tax Measures to Support Caltrain

The Green Caltrain blog has some promising news today for moving Caltrain toward a stable funding solution. Adina Levin from Friends of Caltrain reports:

Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/sp8254/3469683925/in/photostream/##SP8254/Flickr##

At its board meeting on Thursday, SamTrans announced the results of polling that it conducted in June. According to the poll, a ballot measure to support Caltrain and SamTrans would pass, barely, at the 66% threshold required in California. The transit agency is considering a ballot measure on the 2014 ballot to address the underlying financial problems.

The poll found stronger support for a 1/4 cent sales tax to support Caltrain and SamTrans than for a 1/8 cent sales tax to fund Caltrain alone. High priorities for voters include reducing traffic, providing stable funding for Caltrain, supporting transit for the elderly and disabled, and supporting infrastructure.

The poll also showed that Caltrain electrification is massively popular, with 79% of voters in favor.  The controversy over High Speed Rail in recent years has not blunted the overwhelming support for cleaner, faster, more frequent service.

Voters expressed greater support for the tax after the poll asked voters questions about their priorities and values transit service. This strongly suggests that a ballot measure would get better results if there was a campaign to encourage voters to consider the benefits of transit service. Transit supporters have between now and 2014 to raise awareness.

Caltrain relies on unstable funding from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and local transit agencies along the Peninsula. As we’ve reported, the Caltrain Board has declared numerous fiscal emergencies while taking little action to solve the problem in the long run. Although the agency managed to avert devastating service cuts in the last budget cycle, transit advocates have come together to push for long-term measures to ensure riders’ access to quality transit isn’t threatened every time the partner agencies reduce their share of the pot.

The need for solutions is pressing. Levin points out that SamTrans, which Caltrain relies on heavily for funding, already can see its next crisis on the horizon. “The last time SamTrans did a comprehensive financial review in the summer of 2011, it was expected to be bankrupt in 2015,” she said, although she noted that the next review is expected this winter.

There are two main options for establishing stable funding for Caltrain, Levin writes:

One is to have a tax in all 3 counties that Caltrain serves, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara. Another approach is to have a tax in San Mateo County only, which would stabilize SamTrans. If this approach is taken, it would also be important to strengthen the Joint Powers agreement to fund Caltrain. Even if SamTrans is stabilized, SF Muni or Santa Clara VTA could be next – the agreement would need to be changed so that problems in any of the 3 partners don’t risk crashing Caltrain’s finances in any given year.

Judging by national trends and SamTrans’ poll findings, both of these measures hold promise. As Levin notes, transit referendums in American cities had an an 86 percent success rate in the last year, as cities short on federal transit funding looked to local voters for support.

  • Would be great for Caltrain to finally get some stable funding, and be able to throw down for electrification and grade separation.

  • Anonymous

    Electrification is already paid for via High Speed Rail project and regional funding.  There is very little funding for grade separations, though.  San Mateo County has a few hundred million in Measure A funds, and Santa Clara County doesn’t have any funding. A single grade separation such as the San Carlos/Belmont or San Bruno projects costs $150M – $200M.   Grade separations can be done incrementally, based on demand in each city, but there isn’t enough money to do the grade seps cities want.

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/8rezfs7  

  • Fences closing road crossings cost a couple thousand.

  • Anonymous

    @twitter-14678929:disqus I am not hearing a cyclist suggest breaking the street grid. 

  • Anonymous

    Actually, Adina, electrification (and grade separation, and downtown extension, and significantly improved service) were  already promised to the voters as parts of the county and regional sales and bridge toll taxes they already voted for.

    No HSR involved.

    Not unless you’re lied to the voters.  Not unless you’ve abstracted those funds and given them away to your very very very very very special friends at BART and the Central Subway.  (Same friends!)

    More of the standard “fool me once, fool me twice” action, where the dim local populance will vote for anything with even the rattiest thin veneer of “transit” greenwashing.

    Besides, any shiny new sales tax funding for Caltrain will just disappear down the bottomless hole of its hideous, steam-train-appopriate operating rules and operating costs.  Always in a “fiscal crisis”, never a breath about the feather bedding and overhead of “commuter railroad” obsolescence, which, sadly, electrification is certain to make worse (a new trade!  new overheads! new maintenance costs!), not better.

    So no doubt the turkeys will vote for Thanksgiving.  And no doubt they’ll be slaughtered.  Again.

    PS anybody who advocates fewer crossings of the Caltrain ROW is due for immediate re-education.  I’m on my train, screw you little people on the streets!

  • why do we need a crossing at Castro? There is a perfectly good bike bridge over the tracks 1/4 a mile away, not even mentioning that you can cross the tracks in the station itself, at 2 points.

  • Anonymous

    You can’t bike through the Caltrain station, so that’s impractical for cyclists. If you’re talking about the bridge by Stevens Creek trail, that’s .4 miles not counting the bridge.  If you’re headed from downtown Mountain View to Palo Alto by bike, it doesn’t make any sense to go over a mile out of your way in the wrong direction.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

San Mateo County Supes Vote to Fund Bike/Ped Coordinator, SamTrans

|
The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to approve $10 million to boost SamTrans service and $156,000 to create a new full-time bicycle and pedestrian coordinator position over the next two years. The funds come from Measure A, a ten-year, half-cent sales tax approved by voters last November, which is expected to generate $64 […]

Parking Tax Revenue Measure for Muni Makes Its Way to Supervisors

|
Photo: Myleen Hollero/Orange Photography A parking tax increase that could send $19.2 million to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency moved a step closer to the ballot Tuesday, as Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi introduced the measure before his colleagues on the Board of Supervisors. Mirkarimi made the move at the behest of the SFMTA Board, which […]