To Become a Great Biking City, SF Needs to Stop Crawling and Start Running


Our Streetfilm from 2010 documented the experience of North American transportation officials and advocates in Copenhagen during the latest Velo-City conference.

San Francisco doesn’t have to “reinvent the wheel” to become a bike-friendly place — the city need look no further than peers like Copenhagen, widely considered one of the world’s best cycling cities.

So said David Chiu, president of the SF Board of Supervisors, at a forum yesterday evening with the chief of Copenhagen’s Bicycle Program, Andreas Røhl. “We know what needs to get done,” said Chiu. “The answers are there — from segregated cycle tracks, to bike signaling, to more bike parking, to more bike safety, to bike anti-theft measures, to more bike education — these are the pillars of what have worked in other cities.”

Since Copenhagen’s political leadership began implementing measures like physically protected bike lanes and traffic-calmed streets in the 1970s, the amount of bicycling has steadily increased, and today it accounts for 36 percent of work trips in the metro area (and 50 percent within the city proper). Bicycling to virtually any destination is now so safe and convenient, the average citizen does it without thinking twice.

To reach that point, Copenhagen’s leaders overcame many of the same barriers that San Francisco currently faces. Most importantly, they mustered the political will to remove traffic lanes and car parking to make way for safe bike lanes, and they made bike infrastructure a funding priority.

To make bicycling easy and comfortable enough for everyone, said Røhl, a city must provide continuous, safe bicycling conditions on every route — “From point A to point B, even where it hurts.”

“I think we have a little bit of a politically correct culture at this moment of a lot of elected officials who say the right things when it comes to our commitment towards biking, but I don’t think we’re pushing the edge.” – Supervisor David Chiu

“You can do whatever good planning, but if there isn’t that political will to make the tough decisions, it just isn’t possible to provide the quality to make [bicycling] mainstream,” said Røhl.

“Denmark is not fundamentally, quintessentially more of a biking place than we are,” said Leah Shahum, executive director of the SF Bicycle Coalition. “It’s not in their blood any more than it’s in our blood. Rather, leaders in Denmark and other places have chosen to work hard, to make tough decisions, to push the needle to help places like Copenhagen become what is now, I consider, one of the best bicycling cities in the world.”

“Here in San Francisco, we can make similar choices to push that needle as well,” she said. “We can prioritize goals of accessibility, affordability, livability, health, sustainability, so that we can give, if not Copenhagen, definitely every other big city in America, a run for its money.”

There are early signs of that political will in San Francisco. The city has an official goal to increase bicycling to 20 percent of all trips by 2020, which was set after the Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution introduced by Chiu.

Fell Street, where car parking is being cleared for a three-block protected bike lane, which will also include bicycle traffic signals and pedestrian improvements. Implementing more protected bicycle lanes like these will require a continued show of political will. Photo: Aaron Bialick

The SF Municipal Transportation Agency is currently constructing protected bike lanes on three blocks of Fell and Oak Streets to improve a crucial connection along a key route between the city’s eastern and western neighborhoods. The SFMTA worked through the initial complaints about removing roughly 100 car parking spaces to make way for the bike lanes, though planners took more time than initially proposed to replace about half of those spaces on nearby streets. Following extensive outreach by the SFMTA and the SFBC, as well as community planning meetings, the project is now supported by the overwhelming majority of local residents.

Looking at the city’s overall progress, however, lip service hasn’t necessarily translated into action, said Chiu. “While we’ve made some great strides here, we are still, I think, babies crawling towards a goal,” he said. “We need to be running, and hopefully some day, biking towards these goals.”

“I think we have a little bit of a politically correct culture at this moment of a lot of elected officials who say the right things when it comes to our commitment towards biking, but I don’t think we’re pushing the edge.”

In the SFMTA’s next big move to expand bicycle infrastructure, the agency plans to adopt many of Copenhagen’s lessons in its upcoming “Bicycle Strategy,” expected to be released early next year. Few details are available, but agency staff says the document will put forward a connected network of bike-friendly streets where improvements like protected bike lanes and traffic calming will be prioritized. The Bicycle Strategy will also include blueprints for funding bike projects and a messaging campaign to encourage San Franciscans to get around by bike.

A footrest for cyclists at a stop light, which reads, "Hey cyclist, place your foot here... and thanks for cycling in the city!" Photo via ##http://www.copenhagenize.com/2010/01/holding-on-to-cyclists-in-copenhagen.html##Copenhagenize##

As important as protected bike lanes are, the “little things” that Copenhagen does to reward residents for bicycling go a long way too. For instance, bikeways have garbage cans with angled mouths alongside them, to allow cyclists to throw away trash without stopping their bike. Riders who are caught exhibiting good bicycling behavior are randomly rewarded with treats like, of course, a danish, in a campaign called “Good Bicycle Karma,” which began last year. The city’s written messages advertised to cyclists typically include the phrase, “Thanks for cycling.”

That kind of positive messaging would “not cost anything at all for us to incorporate into our own communication,” said Seleta Reynolds, an SFMTA bicycle planner who visited Copenhagen on an agency study trip funded by the Bikes Belong foundation.

Promoting the economic benefits of cycling compared to driving, said Røhl, is key to gaining support for cycling improvements. When savings like lower health care costs, less wear on roads, and reduced need to spend money on transit and car infrastructure are taken into account, he said, studies show Copenhagen actually gains $0.35 for every mile cycled, whereas driving costs $0.30 per mile (even more during rush hour, when accounting for added traffic delays). In all, Copenhagen spends about $25 per citizen on bicycling every year.

“For one mile of metro [rail], we can do a whole regional network of super cycle highways,” said Røhl. “This is about putting what is expensive into context. We try to illustrate that.”

In San Francisco, Chiu said bicycling is currently “close to the bottom” of the city’s transportation funding priorities. “I have colleagues who will say, ‘Yeah we need to be doing these things, but I’d like to fund A, B, and C first,” he said, adding that he’d like to support a measure to fund bicycle improvements on next year’s ballot.

Copenhagen spends about $25 per citizen on bicycling every year.

When it comes down to it, said Røhl, building bike infrastructure is not about money — it’s about politics. “It’s about how you prioritize the means of transport in your city.”

In Copenhagen, bicycle planners try to treat cycling not as an abnormal appendage to a street, but rather as “nothing special,” he said. “If you treat it as nothing special, and just treat it as you treat cars or transit, then you deliver a pretty good quality. It’s very much about making it fast and comfortable to get from point A to B.”

“In the U.S., we treat bikes like either really fast pedestrians or really slow cars,” said Reynolds. “I think that approach to design is almost like putting mountain bike wheels on a monster truck or something. It just doesn’t work. And they have not taken that approach in Denmark — they really design for the unique way that bicyclists get around.”

Røhl, who is about midway along his week-long visit in San Francisco, said he was “relieved” to see that the city has bike routes to take cyclists around the hills and, in large part, avoid them. But to make routes like the Wiggle truly inviting, he said, the city must provide bike lanes similar to those in Copenhagen — physically separated from motor traffic, not sandwiched between parked cars and moving cars.

“If the quality [of San Francisco’s bike lanes] was even better,” said Røhl, “and you had more corridors where you had high quality all the way, it gave me the impression that the city has a lot of potential for improving cycling and getting more people to cycle and start really reaping the benefits, whether it’s economic or quality of life.”

See Røhl in our recent Streetfilm from Vancouver, where he has been working as a bicycle planning consultant.

  • Having just been to Copenhagen, I gotta say the sheer number of cyclists there is staggering.  I suspect a large part of the reason isn’t so much the infrastructure as it is the high taxes on cars and gasoline.

  • mikesonn

    This was extremely hard to read. Hey, David, you are the Board President. LEAD! And that highlighted quote, puke.

    Frustrating. Beyond frustrating.

  • jry

    On Bike to Work Day, our mayor was chauffeured 2 1/2 blocks from city hall and then back again. Enough said. 

    http://blog.sfgate.com/cityinsider/2012/05/10/what-happened-to-the-biking-mayor/

  • Anonymous

    You can’t talk on a cellphone, check email ot text message (safely) when you are riding a bike like you can in the backseat of a car. That’s one reason why politicians and CEOs have chauffeurs. Another reason us personal safety.

  • The Danes are very wealthy (they have a higher gdp/capita than the US).  Car ownership in Copenhagen is high, but people generally use them only when they are going out of town because bicycling within in the city is quicker and easier than driving.  Bicycling is quicker and easier because driving has been made somewhat more difficult, more street space has been dedicated to bicycling, and the city is constantly working to improve its bicycle infrastructure.

    In Berlin, on the other hand, car ownership is low because of economics. However, public transit is very good there and biking is also very convenient.

  •  @KarenLynnAllen:disqus It’ll be interesting to see if fewer people bike once Copenhagen’s Metro system is completed in the next couple of years.  Unfortunately they have a similar rule to Bart where bikes can’t be taken on Metro trains during rush hour.

  • Gneiss

    Along the lines of what Karen Lynn Allen is saying, it’s probably also true that car ownership in Copenhagen is per family rather than per adult.  One of the reasons why SF is so choked with cars is how typical each adult in a family will own a car.

  • Tahoe

    2.5 BLOCKS! WALK!

    And the concept of a security detail for the Mayor of SF is a joke. Half the city would not even recognize Ed Lee, the other half doesn’t care.

  • Politicians of all stripes rarely lead; they follow. They do what causes them the least grief and pain. In my observation, most local politicians are genuinely frightened of their constituency who may yell and scream at meetings, throw shoes, or shed clothes at a moment’s notice. (It is certainly true that some of the most unpleasant public behavior I’ve ever seen displayed has been at community input meetings.) On a national level, politicians are more insulated from constituent mayhem, but they are terrified of losing their donor base. So money talks, but yelling and making politicians miserable also appears to be effective (if, of course, you have lots of free time and don’t mind spending your life being an annoying, unpleasant person.)

    Since it’s pretty clear in the US that most people are addicted to a car-based way of life (even in San Francisco) and will act out like any addict at challenges to this way of life, no matter the impact on their health or their wallet, politicians’ fears on this subject are not unfounded. Though I might think politicians should do the right thing for the future of our country and our planet even if it means political suicide, most do not ascribe to my point of view.

    The message I got from the forum last night (which I attended) was that Chiu and other elected officials have a good idea now of what can and should be done to make a step-level change in bicycling in San Francisco (which is progress), but they sense they will get way more pain for pushing these things forward than they’ll get rewarded for it. It’s almost as if they want bicyclists to riot or something so that the city *has* to act. They want their constituents to demand bicycling facilities so that they know they won’t get their heads chopped off if they provide them. However, if my experience is anything to go by, if you contact a politician, they’ll just send back a form letter justifying whatever it is they were going to do in the first place and you might as well have saved your breath. This catches us in a chicken-and-egg dilemma where people won’t bicycle until there’s better infrastructure, but the city won’t provide better infrastructure until more people bicycle and demand it. Sadly, small numbers of people throwing fits are far more effective at preventing change than a couple hundred people sending polite, pro-change emails are in effecting it. (Not to mention that the thousands of people who might benefit from a change but would not know this until the change was in place will never express an opinion at all.)

    In contrast to San Francisco’s quagmire, Copenhagen is not waiting for its citizens to make demands, it is actively trying to *persuade* its citizens to bicycle (with carrots, sticks and tambourines) because it saves the city so much money in health care costs. That it helps their economy, increases happiness levels, improves city livabilty, helps prevent climate change–these all appear to be just gravy.  But the Danes did go through a period of great turmoil in the 70s with both the oil crisis and bicyclists demanding a share of the road, so there was an initial push for change from the electorate.

  • TN

    Tahoe,

    You’ll notice that around SF there are many places and things named in honor of the late Supervisor Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone. They were both assassinated. And their assassinations changed the political path of the city.

    I don’t think that a security detail for the mayor is at all unnecessary.

  • VCS

    Random quote from google on Danish car taxes:

    “In Denmark, a Ford Focus costs $51,000 — $34,000 of which are taxes.”

    In the USA the same model is a budget/economy car and can be had for under $20K.

  • Tahoe

    I will admit that is contradictory data, but assert that it is anecdotal.

    1) A sitting SF supervisor would have access to the Mayor no matter the security detail.

    2) there is a plaque at Columbine HS in memory of the students killed there. By your logic we need a high security detail at every US High School.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Supe Kim, SFMTA Get Tips From Copenhagen on Creating a Bikeable City

|
Supervisor Jane Kim and SFMTA officials took a trip last month to learn about best practices from two leading bike-friendly cities: Copenhagen, Denmark, and Malmö, Sweden. “I’d assumed that [Copenhagen] always had a bike culture,” Kim told Streetsblog. “I was surprised to learn that they also had a cars-first culture through the 60s and 90s. They’ve actually […]

Learning From Other Cities, Planners Shop Early Visions for Market Street

|
Planners presented early concepts for a new Market Street to the public yesterday, moving the discussion forward on revitalizing San Francisco’s grand boulevard with features like car-free zones, raised bike lanes, faster transit, and more inviting public spaces. The ideas and visualizations, which are available on the Better Market Street website, were presented by planners […]