POWER: Mobility for Low-Income San Franciscans Means Putting Transit First

The "stress and indignities of over-crowding." Boarding the 8x-Bayshore Express, ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/sf2006/8061591907/##Flickr user Confetti## writes: "An older man is knocked down or falls in a scuffle to board an already over-crowded bus."

Advocates for San Francisco’s low-income communities have issued a new report calling for policy changes intended to improve Muni service, increase mobility for transit-dependent San Franciscans, reduce pollution from driving, and improve the city’s economy.

Next Stop: Justice” was released last month by People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER), a group that made headlines over the past year with its Free Muni for Youth campaign. The report highlights the disproportionate impact of poor transit service on San Franciscans who have few transportation options, calling for shifting policy and funding priorities from the automobile to public transit, more bus-only lanes, keeping Muni fares low, and scaling back fare enforcement.

Jaron Browne, POWER’s communications director, said the report is intended to increase the visibility of Muni’s role in improving equity, the environment, and economic opportunity in San Francisco.

“Public transit is already so pivotal, and will be increasingly pivotal for the way that the city functions as a whole, for the future of the planet, and for the way that our families in our communities can access all the resources and opportunities that our city has at hand,” he said.

The report includes “key strategies that we think would help facilitate having a robust transit system that’s well-financed and serves the needs of all San Franciscans, including working class bus riders and the transit-dependent,” added Browne.

Based on data on Muni’s reliability in low-income neighborhoods, POWER’s report states that “the on-time performance on each of these lines in Southeast San Francisco is significantly worse than the system average” of less than 60 percent.

While POWER doesn’t necessarily assert that Muni distributes transit service and improvements inequitably throughout the city, the group says system-wide problems like unreliable, infrequent service and overcrowding have a greater effect on low-income residents. “In transit-dependent, low-income communities, where folks don’t have other means to get around, the impact is more severe,” said Browne. “There are long commutes of more than an hour to get out of Bayview, even if it’s a distance that would only take 10 minutes to drive,” leading some families to pool their money and buy a car.

On-time performance comparisons for Muni lines from POWER's report.

Jeff Hobson, deputy director of TransForm, said the group “welcomes POWER’s presence and organizing in the struggle to win better, more affordable, reliable, and efficient transit for everyone.”

“Today, it takes too long to get anywhere when buses get stuck in clogged traffic,” he said. “Public transportation riders should not be punished with long, frustrating trips – instead, transit should be as smooth and efficient as any other means of travel. Dedicated lanes, all-door boarding, signal priority systems and even level boarding are transit improvements TransForm has long been pushing for.”

One of the recommendations in POWER’s report is “shifting transportation policy to prioritize public transit over car travel,” and Browne said the group’s members are “excited” about “creating whole areas of the city that really prioritize transit.” He specifically mentioned bus-only lanes on corridors like Mission Street and in Chinatown as opportunities. Those are the kind of improvements expected to be implemented in the coming years as part of the SFMTA’s Muni Transit Effectiveness Project.

“We’ve been looking at San Francisco — as a green city, as a progressive city — and how much more we need to do to restrict the auto,” said Browne, “and to really achieve the goal that so many San Franciscans, and so many people even in the city family have identified, to really become a transit-first city.” Browne did note, however, that the group doesn’t necessarily support stop consolidation on local service or congestion pricing.

To help fund transit improvements and increased service, the report recommends “taxing large developers and corporations,” a measure Hobson said TransForm agrees with.

“The city should seriously investigate the following options: increasing the impact fee on new development to a more appropriate level, taxing technology companies, creating a transit assessment district, and taxing sports franchises for transit services,” POWER’s report says.


POWER produced this video last year to show the impact of poor Muni service on transit-dependent San Franciscans.
When asked about the recent push to extend the Transit Impact Development Fee to include large non-profit developments, Browne said POWER didn’t get behind the measure because the misconception that it would tax small non-profit companies “ended up poisoning the water for something that’s actually a really progressive measure.”

“It was unnecessary and not useful to include non-profits in that, and the process was too rushed,” said Browne. “The community wasn’t engaged, and the dialogue wasn’t there, so we did not endorse that proposal because of the alienation of the non-profit community.”

To encourage ridership, the POWER report also pushes the SFMTA to keep transit fares low, citing a 1991 study from the American Public Transportation Association which found that “every 10 percent increase in fares decreases ridership by 4 percent.”

“Nearly half of the 727 bus riders surveyed in San Francisco’s low-income communities and communities of color said they could not afford Muni’s rising fares,” the report states.

POWER profiled the experiences of some of its Muni-riding members.

Fare enforcement also continues to be a point of contention for POWER, which criticized the SFMTA’s 2010 efforts to ramp up enforcement, saying it was disproportionately targeted at low-income communities and immigrants. Although the SFMTA did report a drop in fare evasion in 2010, Browne asserted that the SFMTA’s level of enforcement continues to be over the top, and that the agency, which spends $9.5 million on officers per year while taking in $1 million in citations, loses money on it.

“I think at the very least, San Francisco should scale it back to keep the program to where they’re breaking even,” said Browne. “Even if you reduced the program by $8 million in expenses, and you had some fare enforcement officers, but nothing like the scale we have now, you would see less harassment, less of an aggressive impact.”

“The reality is it’s created a level of tension because of the relationship that people have with the criminal justice system,” he added, claiming that “the MTA can’t demonstrate that they’ve had an increase in farebox collection” since it ramped up enforcement in 2006.

SFMTA spokesperson Paul Rose disagreed. “Fare enforcement can and does have an impact on compliance,” said Rose. “For about a year, we have been redeploying our proof of payment officers more efficiently across the city, rather than by specific lines. During this time, inspections have increased and compliance has improved.”

“Most recent numbers indicate that in November 2012, our proof of payment officers completed 223,000 inspections and issued more than 5,000 citations,” said Rose. “This represents nearly 17 percent more inspections compared to November 2011. During the same time frame, the fare inspection ratio that compares actual inspections to citations-issued improved from 3.5 percent to 3 percent. Overall, due in part to more efficient enforcement, this rate was reduced to 3.6 percent from 5.3 percent when you look at the entire fiscal year. Transit fare revenue, as of November, was up by $1.6 million.”

The full report can be found on POWER’s website.

Streetsblog will be offline Monday in observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and will be back publishing on Tuesday.

  • Davistrain

    It’s not just the working class and the poor folks who have to deal with overcrowding on the Muni.  I’ve seen the “F” streetcars coming back from Fisherman’s Wharf with passengers packed in like sardines.  And I sent in a report on riding the 27 Bryant line while visiting the City last month.  Recognizing that this website favors non-automotive transport, even the most ardent transit booster has to admit that in one’s own car, one always has a comfortable seat.

  • Dexter Wong

     Sounds like the smug reply of someone who has access to a car, I can ignore the needs of those without cars.

  • Mario

    Glad to see POWER organizing for better transit, but their stance on POP is uneducated. SF’s fare inspection rate is well below the industry standards. And the point of inspection is not too collect revenue but to deter fare evasion. So the standard should be to not only count the citations but also the increased compliance. Finally, their stance on congestion pricing is misguided. The should be pushing for fare differentiation so that low income people pay less, not subsidize rich people.

  • Fran Taylor

    Glad to see transportation issues being addressed in a social justice context. Too often, we transpo advocates miss out on the connections with housing, jobs, and health and fail to reach out to activists working on those issues, who in turn don’t include transportation in their demands. POWER has the right idea, connecting those dots like crazy.

  • Davistrain

    I went through several periods of transit dependency, and it does give one a whole new outlook on life, especially in Southern California.  I should also mention that when I visit The City, I either arrive by Amtrak (actually Ambus), or if I do drive up, my car stays at the motel while I rely on Muni.  I’m not sure whether my answer is
     “smug” or “telling it like it is”.  Ideally, there should be enough buses, streetcars and LRVs to make “wall to wall standing loads” a rare occurrence, not an integral part of life in SF.  But finding and funding enough vehicles and operators is a challenge.  Many years ago my wife and I were staying at a motel near the Zoo.  I wanted to get an early start on exploring Muni and she wanted to visit the Palace of the Legion of Honor.  I pointed out the bus stop, left her a collection of coins (this may have been when the fare was 85 cents), and said, “Just wait for the #18 bus and it will take you right there.”  When I got back to the motel she told me about waiting and  waiting, as local residents gathered for the 18.  Finally, the bus came, and one of the locals asked why it was so late.  The driver explained that there were supposed to be five buses on that line on weekends, but there were only two running.  Heck of a way to run a railway.

  • A K

    This issue has been way overdue. Glad to see someone digging in.
    http://powerscootersandchairs.com

  • I really appreciate that POWER is advocating for transit justice. It is something that is critically needed in San Francisco. But they really need to learn a lot more about transit in order to have any hope of being effective. Right now they seem completely clueless when it comes to POP, stop consolidation, Transit Impact Development fees, and more. It is not enough to say that there is a problem. They have to understand how to push for real solutions.

  • Tom

    there are 2 sides of this issue – attracting rich people to ride transit vs ensuring the people who truly depend on transit have what they need in a reliable and humane way.  right now it seems like we’re lacking the latter more, especially with the winter holiday schedule

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Impact of Poor Muni Service on Transit-Dependent San Franciscans

|
A new video from People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER) highlights the impact of unreliable and unaffordable transit on low-income San Franciscans who rely on Muni. In San Francisco, “transportation is a dividing line of access and opportunity for African American, Latino, Asian and Pacific Islander communities who have the highest transit dependency in […]

Supes Avalos, Wiener Clash on Equitable Spending Strategies for Muni

|
Supervisors John Avalos and Scott Wiener are sparring over how new revenue for transit should be spent to benefit the Muni riders who need it most. With tax measures proposed for the 2014 ballot that could significantly increase transportation funds, Avalos introduced a charter amendment yesterday that would “require the city to prioritize investments to address existing […]

Cameron Beach Remembered as Dedicated Transportation Professional

|
Some sad news from the SFMTA today.  SFMTA Board Director Cameron Beach died last night after apparently suffering a heart attack. A semi-retired transportation consultant and former chief operating officer of the Sacramento Regional Transit District, Beach was 62. He had served just over four years on the SFMTA Board. A San Francisco native who […]
oystercard
STREETSBLOG USA

The Future of Transit Fares: Less Cash, More Trust, Faster Service

|
We have the technology right now to revolutionize transit fare payment in ways that make transit systems faster and more user-friendly, via features like tap-and-go payment and all-door boarding. A few leading cities are doing just that, but in America most transit agencies are playing catch-up. TransitCenter recently hosted an event where officials from transit agencies leading the way on […]

Advocates Laud Mayor’s Nomination of Joél Ramos to the SFMTA Board

|
When TransForm’s Joél Ramos led the community outreach charge on the International Boulevard Transit-Oriented Development Plan in Oakland, he went to “ridiculous lengths” to bring everyone to the table. “He really educated people on the potential of the project so they could plug in in a way that’s really more sophisticated,” said fellow TransForm advocate Marta […]