This article is cross-posted from the blog  of former Streetsblog SF editor Bryan Goebel, who’s aiming to launch a new website  “devoted to sustained coverage of biking, walking and transit issues in Sacramento, both at the Capitol and locally.” You can also follow Bryan on Twitter .
A proposal in Governor Jerry Brown’s budget that would change how the administration doles out federal and state money for biking and walking improvements could imperil critical street safety programs such as Safe Routes to School  at a time when California is facing a growing health crisis and trying to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“It does not reflect a serious sense of purpose by this Governor’s Office or the transportation bureaucracy to really make bicycling and walking a central part of California’s transportation system,” said Dave Snyder of the California Bicycle Coalition .
The move by the administration is a response to the federal transportation bill passed by Congress last year. MAP-21  ended some dedicated funding for biking and walking programs.
States are also receiving less money under Transportation Alternatives, the federal program previously known as Transportation Enhancements, which historically granted the bulk of bicycle and pedestrian funding to state transportation agencies and metropolitan planning organizations.
The League of American Bicyclists is encouraging state transportation agencies  to make up for the cuts by seeking funding for street safety projects from other eligible pots of federal money.
California is receiving $80 million in TA funds, $13 million less than last year. In its current form, Brown’s budget, which has been widely praised for being balanced, would not kick in any other money to make up for the loss.
Under the administration’s proposal, the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, which oversees Caltrans, would combine five funding programs, including Safe Routes and the Bicycle Transportation Account, into what’s being called the “Active Transportation Program.”
The combined total in the account would be $134 million, compared to $147 million last year.
Although the administration has been publicly tight-lipped about the proposal, Deb Hubsmith of the Safe Routes to School National Partnership and other biking and walking advocates who have been briefed say it’s being sold as a way to grow investments in biking and walking programs.
However, the current proposal would make the grant process more competitive — meaning money could be siphoned away from biking and walking and into roads and highways — as well as potentially freeze funds and result in lay-offs for Caltrans staffers who have expertise in street safety projects.
“It’s critical that this program start the funding level to recent years, that it truly be for walking and bicycling improvements, and that there be no interruption in active transportation funding,” said Hubsmith.
The funding cuts would come at a time when California’s fatality rate for bike riders and walkers is almost twice the national average, and the state is working to meet stringent environmental goals.
A coalition of organizations is leading an effort to gain assurances that there will be a minimum funding guarantee for Safe Routes to School. According to new data from the National Household Travel Survey collected by Hubsmith’s group, Safe Routes to School has helped to boost annual walking trips in the state among children ages 5 to 15 by 10 percent since it was pioneered in California in 1999.
“Safe Routes to School has been highly successful at improving safety for children, increasing physical activity, and providing alternatives to driving,” said Hubsmith. “We need to work together to achieve California’s goals for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, safety, social equity and sustainability.”
A petition launched last week, led by Safe Routes, the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, TransForm, California Walks and the California Bike Coalition, urges the Governor “to make the new Active Transportation Program truly transformational for bicycling and walking in the state.” So far, more than 7,000 people and 150 organizations  have signed it.
While advocates are worried about the way it’s currently written, they also said the program has great promise.
“I’m excited about it and I want to be a part of shaping it because I think it has the potential to really elevate active transportation as a priority for California,” said Laura Cohen, the director of the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s west coast division.
Hubsmith said overall transportation funding for California remains level. If the administration can propose steady funding for road and highway projects, advocates point out, why can’t it prioritize biking and walking?
“They know that having choices besides driving alone can save us money, improve our health and our environment, and create long-lasting economic benefits,” said Joshua Stark, the state campaign director for TransForm.
“Bicycle and pedestrian funding can have tremendous benefits, and we support combining the different sources into a single fund as long as funding levels stay the same or grow, and critical programs like Safe Routes to Schools continue.”
The Governor’s Office is expected to release more details Friday, when the budget trailer bills are released, and advocates are hoping to persuade administration officials to crank it up a notch.
“We want to see that the structure of this program matches our bold vision for the state of California, and ensures a healthy transportation future for kids and everyone,” said Hubsmith.