SFMTA Board Greenlights Push to End Free Disabled Placard Parking


The SFMTA and the Mayor’s Office on Disability produced this video explaining why free parking for disabled placard holders is bad policy.
Looking to end the dysfunction caused by California’s failed policy of giving free parking to disabled placard holders, the SFMTA Board of Directors unanimously approved a resolution Tuesday giving agency staff the green light to pursue state legislation that would allow local jurisdictions to charge placard holders at meters.

The policy change has been recommended by a committee comprised mostly of disability advocates that was formed to tackle the growing problem of placard abuse, which deprives legitimately disabled drivers of reserved parking spaces close to their destinations, cheats the SFMTA out of revenue, and lets drivers occupy high-demand parking spots all day with no incentive to limit their stay. Consequently, abuse of placards by non-disabled drivers is rampant.

California is one of only 15 states to exempt disabled parking placard holders from having to pay at the meter. Pursuing a change in that law is one of six recommendations made by the SFMTA’s Accessible Parking Policy Advisory Committee, but it’s the only one that the SFMTA can’t implement without approval from the state legislature. It’s currently unknown which state assembly member or senator might introduce a bill.

Bob Planthold, a senior and disability advocate who served on the SFMTA’s committee and initially opposed charging placard holders for parking at meters, pointed out that the 35 states that already do so include Florida and Arizona. “A lot of people retire and move to those states,” he said. “Those states are not having people move away because they require people to pay at the meters.”

“The placard is supposed to increase parking access for us,” he added. “The payment exemption reduces that.”

Carla Johnson, interim director of the Mayor’s Office of Disability, said extensive research from other cities has shown that to effectively make more convenient parking spaces available for disabled drivers, a set of changes — including a substantial increase in disabled-reserved blue zones and enforcement of placard abuse — must be implemented. Ending exemptions from meter payment, she said, is a key part of that.

Although the committee initially planned to seek an endorsement by the Board of Supervisors before pushing for a change in state law, Johnson said the new plan is to pursue the state legislation first. That would allow the supervisors, which would then have the state’s blessing to end the meter payment exemptions within the city, to approve the change. The soonest that such a change state law could go into effect is 2015, she said.

With disability advocates issuing the call for an end to free parking — normally a hot-button issue that can be expected to rouse fierce political resistance — the policy change appears to have very few detractors in the city. The policy change was even endorsed by the SF Chamber of Commerce.

In the above video produced by the SFMTA and the Mayor’s Office on Disability, Jessie Lorenz, executive director of the Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco, said, “I had a neighbor once offer me 400 bucks to use my placard while he drives into the city.”

“It is seen as a way to obtain free parking,” she said.

Here are the six policy recommendations from the SFMTA’s Accessible Parking Policy Advisory Committee [PDF]:

1. Increase blue zones
2. Improve enforcement of placard misuse
3. Increase oversight of placard approvals
4. Remove the meter payment exemption
5. Direct revenue to accessibility improvements
6. Establish reasonable time limits

  • Mario Tanev

    Interesting. The same Bob Planthold has opposed many bicycling and pedestrian improvements in the name of people with disabilities. The argument goes that bike lanes, bulb-outs and so on make it difficult for disabled people to park and exit their vehicles.

  • Jesse

    Who would have thought, you give something away for free, don’t impose limits and it’s abused and overused. Surely that can’t apply to free parking as well, right?

  • voltairesmistress

    Great news, a baby step toward what may prove a difficult state-wide fight. We will need to do a lot of explaining and educating, so that this new legislation when it gets proposed does not appear to work against disabled people, when it is actually in the disabled’s interest.

  • Mark Dreger

    His logic about Florida and Arizona is priceless.

  • Chris Pangilinan

    Definitely. As someone who has a blue placard, it would be nice to be able to find an accessible spot (when I happen to not be on BART or Muni) that isn’t being held all day by someone abusing the system. Very happy to pay market rate for that parking too!

  • RBR

    The the FDR club and may member members from the Senior and Disability community our for for this policy listen to the whole hearing. You do not know want you our talking about. This City need to be able to work for all residents.

  • Mario Tanev

    It is not clear what you are trying to say.

  • PatrickMonkRn

    FREE MUNI: FREE PARKING FOR DISABLED; FREE SF.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SFMTA Looks to Tackle Abuse of Handicap Parking Placards

|
Aiming to reduce handicap parking placard abuse, the SF Municipal Transportation Agency is in the early stages of an effort to reform state laws that enshrine free parking privileges for placard holders. Misuse of handicap placards deprives legitimately disabled drivers of reserved parking spaces close to their destinations, cheats the SFMTA out of public revenue, […]

Assembly Passes Law Cracking Down on Disability Parking Permit Abuse

|
Confiscated counterfeit and altered placards. Photos: Matthew Roth The fines for illegal use of disability placards and for fabricating fraudulent placards could go as high as $1000 if Assemblymember Fiona Ma’s new bill passes the State Senate and is signed by Governor Schwartzenegger.  The bill, which passed in the Assembly near unanimously at 73-3 on […]