SFMTA Confident in Bike/Ped Funds, Says Changing Streets “the Hard Part”

SFMTA officials are growing more confident in obtaining the funding needed to implement the street safety infrastructure called for in the agency’s Bicycle Strategy and Pedestrian Strategy. But no matter how much funding the agency has, the SFMTA needs to address the lack of follow-through and political will to implement street redesigns, which often leaves projects delayed and watered down to preserve traffic lanes and car parking spaces.

“It’s trying to get public acceptance of making that re-allocation,” agency chief Ed Reiskin told the SFMTA Board of Directors at a meeting yesterday on the agency’s Strategic Plan. “It’s a pretty significant change we would need to be making in the public rights-of-way for transit and cycling and, to a lesser extent, to improve pedestrian safety — changes in the right-of-way that have been largely unchanged for the past 50, 60, 70 years. That, I think, is our biggest challenge.”

Cheryl Brinkman, vice chair of the SFMTA Board, said the agency and its board need to stand up to vocal groups who fight efforts to implement the city’s transit-first policy. “We need to be willing to step up and make those hard decisions, and understand that what we see as the needs for transportation in the city, may not jive with what we’re hearing loudly expressed in certain areas,” she said. “We do need to step up say, ‘No, we need to re-allocate space, it has been mis-allocated for so long.'”

While no one at the hearing said Ed Lee’s name (many participants were appointed by him), it was hard to avoid thinking of the mayor’s failure to stand up for contentious street safety projects.

Reiskin told Streetsblog the SFMTA is “developing a new agency-wide approach to public outreach” as well as working with the City Controller’s Office to produce economic studies on the effects of street redesigns “to try to validate or disprove some of the concerns that are raised or the benefits that are estimated from these improvements.” The agency is also gathering research from other cities through the National Association of City Transportation Officials, the coalition of city DOTs currently led by Reiskin.

“We need to do a better job of articulating the transportation, safety, health, and economic benefits, not just based on theory, but based on empirical data from the city and elsewhere,” said Reiskin. “Some people are always gonna need to drive in San Francisco. The more people who are walking, on a bike, or on transit make space for those who really need to use a car for any given trip.”

Making a stronger case to the public is just one area where the city can improve its street planning processes, as laid out in a recent report from the SF County Transportation Authority [PDF], which listed ten chronic problems with the city’s project delivery:

1. City lacks strong and clear leadership implementing transportation policies.
2. City’s Complete Streets (CS) policy doesn’t include a modal hierarchy.
3. Final designs based on consensus can diminish ability to reach project goals.
4. Coordination within and among agencies is inadequate to deliver a multi-modal vision.
5. Agencies have different transportation priorities and cultures.
6. Funding and grant administration processes are burdensome and inefficient.
7. No funding available for pre-implementation or coordination.
8. City lacks a sufficient pool of experienced, proactive project managers.
9. Some city staff who interact with the public need public communication training.
10. CEQA empowers opponents of any project.

“These are long-known problems that the agencies have had in their power to fix for years, and still do,” the SF Bicycle Coalition wrote in a blog post yesterday.

Meanwhile, the SFMTA’s funding prospects for boosting bike and pedestrian improvements are far from a safe bet. The agency is relying heavily on the three ballot measures proposed by the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which combined would bring in $3.8 billion over the next 15 years, some of which would go toward bike and pedestrian improvements. The agency’s proposed two-year budget doesn’t appear to include major boosts from other funding sources, and Reiskin said the success of the ballot measures is “certainly not a slam dunk.” (Mayor Lee even wants to sacrifice Sunday parking meters in a bid to win voter support.)

“There would be a significant impact on our transportation agency” if the ballot measures don’t pass, said Sonali Bose, the SFMTA’s chief financial officer.

Bicycling gets about 1 percent of the capital budget, according to SFBC Executive Director Leah Shahum, who would like to see a commitment to increase the amount to 8 percent. And Walk SF pointed out that the $17 million the city plans to spend on pedestrian safety upgrades over five years, or $3.4 million per year, falls short of the $5 million set aside for small equipment and supplies in the SFMTA’s 2014 operating budget.

“The SFMTA’s proposed budget dramatically lacks a commitment to bike and pedestrian comfort and safety,” said Shahum, who pointed out that even if all three of the transportation ballot measures pass, they couldn’t be used until two years from now. “There seems to be a lot of looking far off into the future.”

“Until we make this a priority, we’re not going to see results on the streets,” said Walk SF Executive Director Nicole Schneider, who lauded the city’s WalkFirst program, the latest iteration of its pedestrian safety plans, but said it’s a “plan based on a plan based on a plan.”

“If we want to really embrace Vision Zero,” which the SFMTA Board adopted yesterday, “we have to actually build these projects.”

  • Yeah, Mayor Lee’s Sunday meter backpedalling is especially baffling in this context. When every dollar counts, why would we reverse something that increases parking availability, reduces vehicle circling/congestion, AND annually provides millions of dollars of revenue for Muni and bike/ped improvements?

    Someone more clever than me needs to come up with a good public relations strategy on that. “Stop the Car Storage Giveaway” t-shirts, or a #SundayMetersHelpMe ____ (“park and shop at local businesses”. etc.) Twitter campaign? Then there’s this, for the season:
    http://www.planninglove.org/image/75454320791

    🙂

  • Jack

    We need leaders and people with the expertise and the know how who have the audacity to be willing to chance and try new things to make our city a better place to walk, to bike and to take mass transit along with reduced bureaucracy, red tape and counter productive unnecessary environmental laws to implement things like pedestrian plazas and protected bike lanes quickly, efficiently and correctly to quickly reap the benefits of these improvements

  • Chris J.

    I’m simply dumbfounded by what I’m reading here. There are all these projects that need to get done, and SFMTA says they have the money. Yet the only action items Reiskin can bring himself to talk about are “a new approach to public outreach,” producing “economic studies,” and “gathering research” from other cities.

    What is the SFMTA doing with its time? What about actually doing something? Yeah, it can be hard to actually accomplish something. But really, that’s the only part that matters. And it’s the reason they exist. Navel-gazing and pushing papers doesn’t help the situation on the streets one bit.

  • mikesonn
  • Chris

    SF leadership…grow some balls!

  • IHeartPandas

    I was at the Vision Zero rally a couple of weeks ago, and when I got back to work, people couldn’t stop asking me about my “I Support Vision Zero” sticker. I got questions like “What’s that? Is it zero waste? Zero parking? Zero calories?”

    I’m tempted to make myself a bunch of “I Support Vision Zero” t-shirts in all colors and just wear a different t-shirt every day until we get to zero traffic fatalities here in SF. 🙂

  • Right. Because “balls” are what improved New York City so much.

    Grow some feminism.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

San Francisco Pedestrian Safety Efforts Mired in City Bureaucracy

|
Despite a growing political focus on pedestrian safety, a thick layer of city bureaucracy and lack of funding are stalling real change to prevent pedestrian injuries and fatalities on San Francisco streets, including three deaths in just the last week. The red tape and dysfunction became abundantly clear at a presentation and discussion at City […]

SFMTA Proposes a Car-Free Powell Street in Union Square

|
The SFMTA has proposed making crowded, traffic-clogged Powell Street in Union Square a car-free street on a trial basis. Removing cars from the equation would make the street function better for pedestrians and cable cars on the blocks between Ellis and Geary Streets. As we wrote last year, it makes little sense to have cars on Powell, which […]

Wiener Proposes Bills to Hack Through Red Tape for Ped Safety Upgrades

|
The bureaucratic red tape encumbering the city’s progress on life-saving pedestrian safety measures is the target of a new legislative package set to be introduced by Supervisor Scott Wiener at today’s Board of Supervisors meeting. “Current city procedures and rules significantly undermine the delivery of pedestrian safety improvements, with insufficient agency coordination and policies that […]