San Mateo Rallies to Rescue Caltrain Electrification

A Swiss double deck EMU, similar to what will one day run on Caltrain...but only if it can electrify its tracks. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
A Swiss double deck EMU, similar to what will one day run on Caltrain...but only if it can electrify its tracks. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Caltrain has bought itself some time — at the price of up to $20 million.

The agency announced on Monday that it had negotiated a three-month extension with the contractors responsible for the rail line’s electrification project. That gives time for Caltrain and the Peninsula to lobby the federal government for a critical $647 million grant.

San Mateo county residents and business groups are joining in an effort to save the electrification project, which would increase Caltrain’s capacity and reduce its pollution.

The Federal Transit Administration grant had been approved in the final days of the Obama administration, but awaited a Department of Transportation signature that couldn’t be given until February 17. On that day, the DOT delayed a decision on the grant, at the urging of California Republicans in congress who had asked to cut off aid to the state’s high-speed rail project. Although the grant was requested by Caltrain, the High-Speed Rail Authority also plans to use the electrified tracks for the bullet train.

Caltrain was ready to begin construction for the electrification project this week. Under the new agreement, it can give its contractors notice to proceed as late as June 30, but at a cost.

Every day the project waits in limbo, the contractors’ overhead costs will rise, according to Caltrain spokesperson Seamus Murphy. He says Caltrain could spend up to $20 million because of those delays, pulling from the project’s contingency fund.

Murphy says that if Caltrain receives the grant by June, they can complete electrification by its planned start date of 2021. But he warns that “if we don’t receive the grant, it will be starting over from square one. There’s no rock with $650 million hiding under it.”

Rosanne Foust, President and CEO of the San Mateo County Economic Development Association, is urging San Mateo residents to sign a petition for President Trump to approve Caltrain’s funding.

“We want to keep the message going towards the White House and to the Secretary of Transportation that this is a vital service,” says Foust. “It connects the innovation economy; it’s environmentally friendly.”

Foust started a hashtag for fans of the project: #StandWithCaltrain.

“This is a really solid project that’s ready to go,” says Foust, “so we encourage the administration to put aside the political rhetoric that is surrounding this and look at the merits.”

Facebook, Oracle, and Electronic Arts are all headquartered near Caltrain stops. Caltrain’s ridership has doubled in the past decade, and now exceeds 60,000 riders daily.

Beyond serving commuters in a region that has become choked with cars, the Caltrain electrification project would create engineering and construction jobs in San Mateo County.

Carl Guardino, President and CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group (SVLG), says that the region served by Caltrain represents 14 percent of California’s gross domestic product, and 43 percent of all venture capital investment in the US.

The electrification project “is critical to the success of Silicon Valley,” says Guardino, “which of course is critical to the United State’s economy.”

Representatives of the SVLG and Caltrain will both fly to Washington this month, and Caltrain will top the agenda.

Seamus Murphy, of Caltrain, says they’ve scheduled over sixty meetings to lobby federal officials, including Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao.

San Mateo’s elected representatives have fallen in line.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-San Mateo) said in a statement that “this decision to delay would threaten to break the backbone of this economy. To make America great again, the President should order that this grant be made and then join us to turn dirt as 9,600 good American jobs related to this project—spread over thirteen states—are created.”

Joe Beckner, a San Mateo County resident and business owner, says he doesn’t often make calls to politicians. But he called up the office of Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield), who signed the letter requesting the grant’s delay.

“I just think it was totally political,” says Beckner, who has lived in San Mateo county for 30 years.

In an op-ed for the San Mateo Daily Journal, former San Mateo County Supervisor Tom Huening argues that if the federal government pulls out of the Caltrain project, tech companies could provide some “angel funding.”

“How about help from the companies most needing to get their folks to work and continue to grow,” asks Huening, who also served on the SamTrans board of directors. Tech companies “bring the jobs and economic growth but also create traffic congestion.”

Huening suggests a half-cent sales tax “matched by an equal, large employer payroll tax.”

Another option, proposed by Joseph Baylock of the blog the Burlingame Voice: Caltrain should receive electrification funding after divorcing itself from high-speed rail plans. He’s started his own White House petition.

But the High-Speed Rail Authority is also providing $713 million dollars to Caltrain’s $2 billion project.

Carl Guardino, of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, remains optimistic that electrification will go forward.

“In Silicon Valley we’ve learned long ago as innovators that if a door is closed, you check the window,” says Guardino. “So we absolutely don’t give up.”

A version of this story ran on KALW radio.

  • thielges

    It is not wise to count on corporate angel funding to close even a small part of the federal gap. Those public companies answer to their shareholders who will want proof of return on that investment. There’s a clear positive return to the community at large in the form of reduced freeway congestion, lower pollution, and faster rail travel. But it is hard to demonstrate how many dollars will come back to Facebook, Google, Nvidia, etc. bottom line to please their shareholders.

    Lack of adequate transportation infrastructure will drive jobs away from the area. That is not particularly a big concern of these large companies who are already expanding outside of the Bay Area.

    The best approach is to continue to push federal agencies to do what is right. Caltrain electrification stands on its own, regardless of whether or when HSR is built. Make sure the feds acknowledge the flaws of the disingenuous letter from CA’s republican delegation. Make it clear that stalling/cancelling Caltrain electrification is a political move that will damage the Bay Area’s and indirectly the entire country’s economies.

  • gneiss

    Also, it should be made absolutely clear to those CA Republican representatives that these actions will have electoral consequences. It’s not outside of the realm of possibility for people from the affected districts to provide funding and support for their opponents (both in primaries and the general) in the next election cycle. If they want to mess with the bay area economy, we can certainly feel justified in messing with their politics.

  • Jeffrey Baker

    Those guys do the great majority of their fundraising in LA and SF anyway. They are backed by coastal techno-libertarians or, as you and I might say, jerks.

  • hikertom

    I called Kevin McCarthy’s office in Bakersfield and left him a message that when Democrats regain the White House I will urge my House member to oppose federally funded infrastructure projects in his district.

  • DrunkEngineer

    There’s no rock with $650 million hiding under it.”

    Nonsense. There are a huge number of Hwy 101 corridor widenings and interchange projects in the planning pipeline all up and down the Peninsula. These highway projects shouldn’t be built anyway as they will draw customers away from Caltrain.

  • justaskwhy

    Funny that there is a link to the pro-funding petition but no link to the anti-funding petition. It reads like just another twisted article cozying up to the big but inept bureaucracy that is Caltrain.

  • Steve Taylor

    Perhaps the State could find the $650 million by “redirecting” State funds for infrastructure projects in the districts of the Representatives who signed the letter requesting the hold to the CalTrans project.

  • gb52

    I would love it if tech companies would help fund the transportation needs of the bay area, but they should not be responsible to make up for money the federal government should provide. We pay plenty of federal taxes and to deny us our share is just asking for retaliation. Perhaps we shouldn’t be paying so much in federal taxes and leave it to state taxes to fund our projects with our money.

  • murphstahoe

    Catch 22 – the biggest infrastructure project in his district is probably high speed rail

  • murphstahoe

    No kidding, Just like when Breitbart had ads for Trump and not Hilary.

  • Definitely agree with that. Spending money on transit doesn’t actually save any money when other projects to continue to expand roads are simultaneously being undertaken.

  • Yep, classic example of people voting against their interests.

  • He says Caltrain could spend up to $20 million because of those delays, pulling from the project’s contingency fund.

    Next, we’ll see a letter from the Republican delegation asking for a denial of funds by alleging that the project is “already going over budget” and “suffering delays”. That’s step three of the Republican’s delay, inflate, and defund playbook.

  • justaskwhy

    You are so far off topic that you can’t see it from the caboose. But I’ll play along. Why is Caltrain not just playing into the Trump infrastructure rhetoric and just asking for Tier 4 clean diesel money on their own right now? Answer: HSR politics and Brown’s legacy. Losers: Us.

  • justaskwhy

    I know lots of Democrats and Independents who are 100% opposed to this because it is the high-speed rail camel’s nose under the tent.

  • murphstahoe

    lol wut?

  • murphstahoe

    This is BS. Caltrain should have been electric 20 years ago, it doesn’t matter how it happens it needs to happen.

  • I know a lot of people who are against a lot of things. That doesn’t mean that they aren’t good ideas.

  • Why ask for Tier IV diesels when electrics are better…?

  • justaskwhy

    “The ends justify the means”….always a losing argument.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

It’s a Go for Caltrain Electrification

|
This morning, during its regular meeting in San Carlos, the nine-member Caltrain board voted unanimously to dedicate $1.25 billion towards electrifying Caltrain. If all goes according to plan, electric services will begin in 2020. “The total program is $2 billion. That includes money for the advanced signal system, which we’re already installing today,” said Jayme Ackemann, spokeswoman […]
Image: Caltrain

Fate of Caltrain Electrification Hangs on Trump’s Budget

|
There will be many news stories generated by the announcement of the details of President Donald Trump's proposed budget next month. In advance of the announcement, the campaign to preserve funding for the electrification of Caltrain is working with advocates around the state and country to preserve a nearly $650 million grant agreement scuttled by the Trump Administration in February.