SPUR Talk: Dutch Lessons on Sea Level Rise and the Built Environment

The Dutch have learned how to integrate urban infrastructure and water control. Photo:  MaxPixel
The Dutch have learned how to integrate urban infrastructure and water control. Photo: MaxPixel

If San Francisco doesn’t want to end up flooded, it better learn from the Dutch. That was the theme of a panel discussion held yesterday afternoon at the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR)’s downtown location. “Holland has a culture of urgency. Compared to our experiences here, they’re not hung up about collective action,” said Tom Leader with TLS Landscape Architecture. “They just make things happen.”

Leader, along with other panelists and members of SPUR’s staff, got to tour and study water infrastructure in the Netherlands last Fall. Laura Tam, SPUR’s Sustainable Development Policy Director, who moderated the discussion, said how impressed they were with Dutch infrastructure and the country’s capacity for “economic resilience and regeneration” after floods.

A look at how much of the Netherlands would be under water, if not for dikes and other measures. Image: Wikimedia
A look at how much of the Netherlands would be under water, if not for dikes and other measures. Image: Wikimedia

Michael Yarne, a panelist with BUILD, focused on the politics and land ownership economics that allow the Dutch to build large infrastructure projects, such as dikes and other water diversion and pumping systems, in the middle of cities. “I kept scratching my head, how do they do it? How do they manage to invest in this kind of long-term, high quality investment?” he said. The answer surprised him and, unfortunately, would be difficult to duplicate. “95 percent of the land in Amsterdam is owned by the government,” he said. “Almost every project you see, private or public, is on a ground lease. It allows…a highly efficient public sector that knows how to negotiate with the private sector.”

Yarne explained that because most of the land is collectively owned, it allows the city to think longer term about the value of large public works projects. “Our land and tax system doesn’t allow us to do this, but that doesn’t mean we can’t learn from the Netherlands,” he said.

For example, he showed a picture of a Dutch dike. But it didn’t look like a big wall holding back water, as one might expect. Instead, it is topped off with paths and greenery and a playground. “The infrastructure is so integrated that you don’t even notice it…the dikes create a whole new landscape.”

Collaborating and creating large-scale water-management infrastructure is something that grew out of necessity in the Netherlands, he explained. Because of constant flooding and the disease it brings, centuries ago the Netherlands formed “water boards” to manage and control water flow. “Property owners banded together to…manage the dikes,” he explained.

SPUR's SF location was packed with Nederphiles learning about water management. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
SPUR’s SF location was packed with Nederphiles learning about water management. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

Andrew Wolfram of TEF Design gave an even more dramatic example of how the Dutch have collaborated on huge water projects. He talked about the Nijmegen, a city on the Waal river. “The river has a bottleneck,” said Wolfram. “And when there’s excessive rains…the lower areas of the city flood, including the historic center. So a project they’ve been studying for a long time is to relocate the dike and the river.”

The project was named the “Room for the River Project” and it involved creating a bypass around the pinch point in the river so water would have someplace to go aside from the historic core when there are heavy rains. They also created a new island and bridges. But, in Dutch tradition, they didn’t stop there. “They created an amphitheater along the river, so it could be occupied during the summer,” said Wolfram. “It’s become an integral part of the city.”

The Dutch city of Nijmegen diverted a river, created an island, and built new bridges to divert water, protect the city, and create new public spaces. Image: Wikimedia
The Dutch city of Nijmegen diverted a river, created an island, and built new bridges, to divert water, protect the city, and create new public spaces. Image: Wikimedia

“In Amsterdam, when it rains ‘where does the water go’ is always the question,” said Leader. He talked about a parking lot where they replaced the asphalt with a mosaic of concrete and permeable gravel, so that water can drain straight down into a pumping system.

He also showed photos of the Water Square in Rotterdam. It appears to be a large public square with several levels. But its actually part of a large pumping system. And during a heavy rain, if the drainage is overwhelmed, the depressed areas can be filled with water and double as a catch basin. “Clearly this is taking the bull by the horns; putting functional urgency in the center of these squares,” he said. “We’ve been ripping out plazas that are below the street, but the Dutch are doing the opposite to contain and manage water.”

Public spaces can double as backup catch basins during heavy rains. Image: The Dutch Water Sector
Rotterdam’s “Water Square.” Public spaces double as catch basins during heavy rains. Image: The Dutch Water Sector

So what does this say about the Bay Area and how it will respond to rising sea levels–and the increased danger of flooding that it carries? The panelists pointed out that even if the Bay Area builds a system of large dikes around the Bay, at some point a bad flood may overwhelm them. San Francisco, they said, needs to manage floods and prepare diversions and storage areas for when the worst happens. “As we start to build levees towards the Bay, where will water go?” said Leader. “The city itself has to manage its own run-off.”

An audience member reminded everyone that in the 1953 North Sea Flood, dikes failed and about 2,000 people died. They learned from that experience. “The Dutch have a saying that water always wins,” said the audience member. “It’s not about the walls, it’s about the integration.”

The panelists added that the kind of infighting and parochial interests that jam up large public works projects in the Bay Area are less prevalent in the Netherlands. Leader said the Bay Area will change its priorities too. “This will be changed by natural catastrophe,” he added. “But I wish it can happen sooner.”

For more events like these, visit SPUR’s events page.

  • JustJake

    Wonder how Ed Lee, Peskin et al will approach and pay for sea level rise mitigation. Oh, that’s right, they’ll run to Sacramento for permission to tax others.

  • Steve Case

    San Francisco Tide Gauge:
    http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/10.php
    Alameda Naval Air Station Tide Gauge:
    http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/437.php

    Armed with an Excel spreadsheet anyone can download the data from the PSMSL tide gauge records to analyse what the historical trends have been.

    Steve Case – Milwaukee, WI

  • basenjibrian

    So your approach is they (Peskin and Lee) simply pay for it themselves out of their own pocket? Who are the “others”?
    That’s what your comment implies.
    Someone has to pay for it.

  • JustJake

    Responsibility would be SF pays for SF needs. It’s a local problem.

  • basenjibrian

    Fair enough.
    Except San Francisco is a regional center that serves far more people and plays a far larger economic, social, tourism, and social service roll than just the residents of SF. Destruction of SF due to flooding would have regional, statewide, and national impacts, even if the suburban enclave residents of Alamo or Los Altos refuse to admit it.

  • JustJake

    Extrapolate. They continue to build and develop heavily in the Miami waterfront. There is profit to be made, now. The future doesn’t look as rosy. At what point do those in Nebraska have a financial responsibility?

    Even in the local Bay Area, SF proper continues to make planning & financial decisions that are not supported by nearby cities, much less inland areas. Sheesh, they are developing Treasure Island when it would be better suited as a park. Why should it’s needs be subsidized?

    They could build arks. There is higher ground availabile. To perpetuate the SF status quo, at a not too far off date, won’t pencil out. It’s not a requirement that it be sustained.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SPUR Talk: Market Street Prototyping Festival Debrief

|
This afternoon, the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) hosted a panel discussion at its Mission Street location that was a debrief for the Market Street Prototyping Festival. From the festival statement: The Market Street Prototyping Festival builds upon the Better Market Street project, a five-year, multi-agency effort led by San Francisco Public […]

SPUR Talk: Developing the Oakland Waterfront

|
SPUR hosted a lunchtime forum today at its Oakland location to discuss the $1.5 billion Brooklyn Basin development. The panel, which was moderated by SPUR’s Oakland director Robert Ogilvie, included Mike Ghielmetti of Signature Development Group, Matt Franklin of MidPen Housing, and Patricia Kernighan, who represented District 2 of Oakland during the authorization phase of […]
Jay Walder and Darlene Gee at SPUR Oakland. Photo: Streetsblog

SPUR Talk: Bike-Share and the Transportation Revolution

|
Last night, the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) and Young Professionals in Transportation hosted a talk and discussion about bike-share and the transportation changes taking place in our cities. The event, which was held at SPUR’s Oakland location, featured Jay Walder, the CEO of Motivate. One of many items that stood out: […]

The Death Star, Apple and Urban Design: SPUR Talk on the Future of Cities

|
Monday afternoon the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) hosted a lunch-time talk entitled “Designing For What We Don’t Know Yet,” that discussed architectural and design concepts for workplaces of the future. Some 80 people attended the panel at SPUR’s Mission Street headquarters, which covered concepts ranging from building offices on […]

SPUR: How Will 1.7 Million More People Cross the Bay?

|
Crossing the Bay from SPUR on Vimeo. SPUR has produced a new video that asks: How will 1.7 million more people cross the Bay? From the SPUR blog: In the last century, visionary planners made major investments linking San Francisco and the East Bay. When the 20th century dawned, the only way to get from […]