Skip to content

Recent Comments

  1.  

    p_chazz

    Maybe because it was built two years before Vision Zero? Get your facts straight.

  2.  

    Jeffrey Baker

    Because it’s not run by assholes?

  3.  

    MrEricSir

    Twitter got a sweet deal from SF by threatening to leave. I’m wondering why Google doesn’t try the same with Mtn View?

  4.  

    Jass

    I still dont get why they didnt use the construction to extend the Muni line. Also, disappointing lack of trees on the new, wider side.

  5.  

    murphstahoe

    A lot of these Uber drivers don’t know the streets and rules of safety. I
    am not saying taxi drivers do, but at least they can be held
    accountable and SFMTA should have direct communication with them.

    Self Driving cars, please.

  6.  

    mx

    The general concept of “what’s done is done” is one we have to live with though. (Yes, I know I gave you another tautology. Cope.) Uber and Lyft are incredibly popular in SF. They, along with transit, walking, biking, carsharing, taxis, and other options make it feasible for a lot of us to not own cars and still get around efficiently. They also help support a DUI-free nightlife scene. The services aren’t going to go away because you don’t like them, and the people who use TNCs are going to still have the same transportation needs if you forced Uber and Lyft out.

    We have to figure out ways to make these types of services work as part of our overall transportation system in SF. Simply that the companies are racketeering organizations” doesn’t help us accomplish anything.

  7.  

    Andy Chow

    If they’re diesel they would be good party buses. CNG buses have shorter tank life and they’re expensive to replace,

  8.  

    Alexander Vucelic

    the trauma must have been terrible

  9.  

    p_chazz

    This project was finished two years ago, which means it was approved well before that, and well before Vision Zero came to pass.

  10.  

    murphstahoe

    To add to the sting in Park District – despite all the crapshow on Townsend Street headed to Caltrain with crazy double parked cars in the bike lanes, and illegally u-turning cars on Townsend – the SFPD set up a cop at 5th and Townsend to ticket cyclists rolling the T intersection there this AM.

  11.  

    roymeo

    I’ll admit that I was surprised that the second half of the article wasn’t a steam-roller.

  12.  

    roymeo

    I didn’t intend to imply the quote was from the View, just entertaining that a stadium placed in the middle of the zone of where people park to attend events at Telephone Company Park can’t handle 9000 people. The article itself did have quite a lot in the second half that seemed to be telling the first half and headline to calm down and take some deep breaths. But this one+previous articles in the View have made me get the feeling that this is being pitched as wise ‘locals’ vs. silly developers. in the paper.

  13.  

    murphstahoe

    But maybe that’s a dichotomy we should think about addressing; yes, Fisherman’s Wharf is basically for tourists.

    My parents are in town. They live in Longmont Colorado, which is pretty much Car, Colorado. They arrived at SFO, got on the BART, exited at Embarcadero, and took a pedi-cab to their hotel in Fisherman’s Wharf. They used the cable car to go to dinner. It lowered their stress level substantially, and it wasn’t *that* hard to navigate, despite me failing to mail them Clipper Cards ahead of time.

    The F-Market is usually VERY packed with tourists from around Montgomery to the Wharf. And the cable cars – sheesh.

  14.  

    ladyfleur

    Yes. I know it’s hard to believe, but it does happen.

  15.  

    keenplanner

    As a planner, this methodology has been well known for years. The hard part is getting the local merchants to take the leap. Ask any merchant along thriving Valencia Street if they want it to return to a 4-lane traffic sewer, without bike lanes. Also, Jefferson was converted back to a 2-way street, which is much better for eastbound cyclists, especially those on rented bikes.
    I see Jefferson as a shining success. Not that I ever go TO Fisherman’s Wharf, but it’s easier to go THROUGH FW, which, IMO is enough to get the idea.

  16.  

    Thomas Rogers

    Yeah, it’s subjective, but I think relative to a lot of things you might read in the PV, that article is pretty even-handed.

  17.  

    hp2ena

    At least 3 Leap vehicles are up for auction on that site. I wonder how much they will sell for?

  18.  

    Alexander Vucelic

    you PAID to park ?

  19.  

    jonobate

    I don’t think that’s fair; the article is reasonably balanced. The text you quote is from an arena opponent, but there are arena supporters quoted as well.

  20.  

    datbeezy

    Generously, Streetsblog’s editorial standards could be described as “arbitrary”.

  21.  

    datbeezy

    This is dubious. I very rarely visit the area, but I recall it was choked with construction during 2012.

    In any regard, a study without a control and a bunch of anecdotes doesn’t register for me.

  22.  

    RussellShakleford

    Interesting results, but pretty limited things can be drawn from the study because (1) This may only work in tourism-dominated areas, so in proper neighborhoods (with grocery, hardware stores, etc.) you may not have the same effect. (e.g.: Polk Street is a totally different shopping demographic, so don’t expect the same results there) And (2) Measurement of spending during the 2013 America’s Cup, which was designed to draw people to that space, may not have been the best time period for to look at for an accurate measurement. That would be like changing meter prices during Fleet Week, and saying that there was an increase in spending over the previous weekend, so it must have been the different meter pricing.

  23.  

    RussellShakleford

    “The net volume of tourism also hadn’t significantly changed over that period.”

    So there wasn’t more tourism during the America’s Cup? I find that hard to believe.

  24.  

    ladyfleur

    I’ve lived in the burbs about an hour away from Fisherman’s Wharf for about 30 years. I’ve probably visited it once a year, and have only parked there maybe five times. The other times I either took a cable car, street car or bus from BART or Caltrain or rode my bike from Caltrain.

    When I drove I either parked in the garage by Pier 39, at Fort Mason or in the paid lots near Levi’s Plaza and walked in. If people want to drive we should direct them to garages or paid lots on the periphery, not encourage them to circle for the very limited street spots.

  25.  

    roymeo

    Oh, Potrero View, you’re trying so hard!
    That headline doesn’t really match the content, despite your trying so hard.
    “This neighborhood can’t handle 9,000 people.”

  26.  

    TLock

    That sucks. Make sure you throw your weight backward and downward when you brake hard on the front and rear simultaneously. A bike should be able to stop in shorter distance than a car.

  27.  

    TLock

    Oh my god, you do not know what ‘Yield’ or ‘Right of Way’ mean, and therefor cannot understand the Idaho Stop Law.

  28.  

    Jym Dyer

    @mx – Gosh, really? “It’s 2015?” Argument by tautology sure is easy, ennit?

  29.  

    TLock

    The problem is that people reading this article evidently don’t know what yield means. It is black and white. I agree with you in supporting “stop means yield for human powered vehicles”.

  30.  

    Bob Gunderson

    But where will all the merchants… I mean, disabled people, elderly, children with puppies, park their cars?!

  31.  

    hp2ena

    Probably late to the game with this one: do we know how the project will impact performance on the E or F lines? How will the already-completed Phase 1 project affect the Streetcar Extension to Fort Mason (since the LPA currently calls for it to operate one block west to Leavenworth, which is half of the Phase 1 project).

  32.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    The veto of curbless roads comes from somewhere deep inside DPW, and may or may not be due to some historical nitwit “disabled activist”, or the threat of nitwittery, or some past threat of nitwittery. It is not enshrined in the Sacred Americans with Disabilities Act, but rather within the “no can do” culture which pervades all of San Francisco.

    My direct personal (ie anecdotal!) experience with actual blind people is that they sat say there are a number of mechanisms that make them perfectly aware of sidewalk-to-deathmonsterroadway transitions, and that the insistence of “the city family” on automobile-oriented street design is not anything designed to improve their lives.

  33.  

    Greg Costikyan

    So the first time I visited Fisherman’s Wharf was in the late 80s; I drove up from Orange County with my then-wife and inlaws, and our reaction was what you might expect from car-culture suburbanites; wow, finding parking is hard, and expensive, and the traffic here is terrible.(We still had fun.) More recent visits have been along the lines of taking the Muni there with my daughter, visiting me from New York, and feeling that the sidewalks are too crowded with too much space devoted to motor vehicles.

    But maybe that’s a dichotomy we should think about addressing; yes, Fisherman’s Wharf is basically for tourists. And yes, most tourists come from car-culture America, and don’t instinctively know how to navigate crowded urban areas. My guess is that most tourists going to New York KNOW that it’s different before they get there, don’t expect they’ll be able to get everywhere in a car, and likely understand they’re going to navigate the city by cab, transit, and feet, as a matter of course.

    Certainly, visiting from Orange County, I didn’t instinctively have that understanding of San Francisco; I mean, it’s California, isn’t it? The land of the automobile.

    In general, I think SF could benefit by spending some effort signalling to visitors that they don’t need cars here, and indeed are better off leaving it parked somewhere; that getting around the city isn’t that hard, and in fact, at 7 miles x 7 miles, a car doesn’t help much. And hey, trolleys and the F Muni are fun, never mind the cable cars.

    The lack of wayfaring signage doesn’t help; when I moved to SF, it took me quite a long time to figure out the bus system in particular, and I imagine few tourists have much confidence in using it either. How can we fix that?

  34.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    What “to do about” Stockton is blinding obvious, and has been for decades.

    * No private automobile traffic on Stockton, anywhere between Market and Columbus. (Possible exception for “Bush”—Post—Geary, for garage access.)

    * No parking. No turns onto Stockton from any cross street.

    * Stockton through Chinatown (Sacramento—Broadway) converted to three lanes, with doubled (or more than doubled) width sidewalks. The two curb lanes are Muni, taxi, and local delivery truck exclusive, the middle lane being for parking delivery trucks serving the many business along these blocks.

    All problems solved.

    Except for the “problem” that PBQD, Tutor-Saliba and associated grotesquely corrupt, rent-seeking consultants and contractors, along with their on-the-take patsies at SFMTA, SFCTA and in the “Mayor”‘s Office, needed to be gifted more than two billion public dollars for the horrific, negative-value Central Subway to Nowhere. So, no, the main problem isn’t solved by truly simple and negative cost traffic reconfiguration, and Stockton Street must remain a clusterfuck forever. It’s The American Way!

  35.  

    Justin

    None of these trips to other cities learning about cycling infrastructure will be useful if we can’t turn those ideas into reality. And certainly none of these trips to other cities that have good PROTECTED cycling infrastructure will be useful or helpful because most of our elected leaders and SFMTA don’t have the BALLS and courage to implement them where it’s needed in a timely efficient manner!

  36.  

    Justin

    Looking at the top photograph of Jefferson St, having walked there before, the way it is, the two blocks of Jefferson St between Hyde and Jones should be pedestrianized. I’ve been there a few times, and those times I visited it can be packed, despite the wide sidewalks it can still feel crowded. I think if they pedestrianized it and banned all motor vehicles, except for delivery vehicles, there would be more space and my guess would be that it would attract more people in a positive way only adding more life, energy and business to that area as well as improved safety and increased space. It would be great to see the street level up with the sidewalks.

    Now that they got the unsurprising proof and evidence that the improvements turned out very well, I wouldn’t be surprised if pedestrianizing the rest of the street completely would turnout positively as well. This seems like a big misopportunity to me, they could have made it even better!

  37.  

    tungwaiyip

    For example, this article says overall San Francisco tourism spending has increased from 8.9 to 9.4 in the same period. So some of the increase should be attribute to this general trend.

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2014/03/27/san-francisco-tourism.html

    Overall this is a good story. I am just wary of all these blog posts that says, as a matter of fact, when you do X, it will result in a success of Y. The reality is usually not so simple.

  38.  

    jamiewhitaker

    Painting crosswalks, pretty doable. Installing crosswalk signals where there are none for pedestrians crossing Van Ness and Tenderloin intersections or adding signals with countdowns, pretty doable. The idea that there is the Vision Zero map of high injury corridors and intersections that need funding to get fixed up, but let’s spend $1.7 million on a primarily tourists used and relatively safe street… Disingenuous hyperbole when there is talk about protecting pedestrians with such prioritization of Jefferson over high injury streets in District 6. This strikes me as simple electioneering with public dollars for benefit of Mayor’s appointed District 3 rep at the expense of pedestrian injuries and lives on high risk corridors that a decent human being would give first priority instead of Jefferson Street getting $1.7 million.

  39.  

    Althaea

    The Broadway tunnel is the death trap tunnel in the city. On the eastbound approach to the tunnel vehicles are blinded as their eyes are adjusted to the outdoor light and then suddenly encounter darkness in the tunnel as it also curves. It is extremely dangerous.

    The Stockton tunnel is not the bike-friendliest, but is much safer than the Broadway tunnel.

    Here again is another phony politician who has probably never got off their ass onto a bicycle in the city, trying to score brownie points…

  40.  

    M.

    Some education was necessary and there’s still not total buy-in by the locals but as the tunnel is a few blocks away from ‘claimed turf,’ the discussion was more reasonable.

  41.  

    M.

    And 2nd

  42.  

    M.

    When successful examples from all over SF, the US, and the world were put before the Polk opposition, the refrain was always “We’re not them.” To which my reply was on the order of, “But we’re all human and we all behave similarly; we congregate, stroll and relax in safe, pleasant places and car-filled streets are not safe, pleasant places. When we linger we spend.” It has made a dent but has a way to go. One example is that the Middle Polk Ass. has rebranded to being transit friendly. No sign yet that they’ve taken up the 22-Day Muni Challenge ;-) Bobby, G.

  43.  

    M.

    Not so. I’ve spoken with Campbell and the surveying before and after was carefully planned to take into account other factors. The net volume of tourism also hadn’t significantly changed over that period. The fact that merchants who had strongly opposed the change are now happily denying that they ever did is the biggest tip off.

  44.  

    M.

    The art of the doable in SF. It’s that simple, Jamie.

  45.  

    tungwaiyip

    It is good news the Fisherman’s wharf’s sales has go up. This is really a good reference to debunk the catastrophic prediction some merchants assert, often no good basis, on reconfiguring street use. Kudos to the CBD for doing this survey to allow people make decision base on information.

    That say, I don’t think there is enough evidence to support that claim that “Street Revamp Boosts Sales”. The article zero in to one particular change, the street improvement and attribute all success to this one factor. When you step back, you will see there are a lot of relevant factors weren’t considered. In particular, the general economic upswing in the Bay Area and the running of the 2013 American cup. All these could have make significant boost to the Wharf business.

  46.  

    peternatural

    Wait, is this real? I thought the best customers were the ones speeding past at 40 mph.

  47.  

    murphstahoe

    Because there are no NIMBYs there

  48.  

    gb52

    I wish Polk would make the same realization. And I wish the businesses would help find these projects that directly benefit them. But most importantly, I’m glad it’s working and that these projects would take off without so much commendation and opposition.

    Thank you for giving it a chance. Thank you for a great design, and may we try this in other places too. In fact there was just the article about the possible Stockton tunnel revamp, and essentially market street will finally become a true transit oriented street.

  49.  

    Mike Fogel

    For south bay commuters, and if you don’t consider 9th & 10th downtown. Or 6th or King with 280. But – point taken. It would be better to route any protected bike/pedestrian space on the east side of 4th – so it didn’t conflict with the existing freeway ramps.

  50.  

    jamiewhitaker

    Note that Jefferson Street is NOT a Vision Zero High Injury Network or Intersection, and why the fork is this a priority with $1.7 million of public dollars when people are dying on the high injury networks and intersections that SHOULD be fixed first? Then there is that Stockton Street tunnel thing yesterday. The bullshit factory is sure full of it.

    https://www.sfmta.com/sites/default/files/projects/2015/vision-zero-san-francisco.pdf