Skip to content

Recent Comments

RSS
  1.  

    Gezellig

    The Siemens cars in Amsterdam are indeed a smooth ride! However, one thing they share with SF’s lightrail is they’re not a very fast way of getting around:

    http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2686/Binnenland/article/detail/3079940/2011/12/16/Tramroutes-Amsterdam-hopeloos-ouderwets.dhtml

    Headline translated: “Tram Routes Amsterdam Hopelessly Old-Fashioned”

    According to that report the average tram speed in Amsterdam is 12kmh/7mph. This is even slower than Muni Metro’s current 13-15kmh/8-9mph average.

    In my experience living there it’s far faster to bike in the city. For example, I lived near the zoo in central Amsterdam and to visit my friend on the western edge of the city only about 7km/4m away it required a 45-minute tram ride involving transfers (traMsfers?). Biking was 25 minutes. You can bet on which mode I normally chose.

    You’re right about the high ticket costs but via tax-free employer programs a lot of employees there (such as myself when I was living there) get a smartcard that allows free transit through any transit zones necessary for their specific commute and significant discounts (40% off) for all other transit travel through other zones in the country for any transit mode (at any time, not just for work hours/days). This effectively means everyday transit costs are nonexistent or low for many people but many still choose to bike, as I did, because it’s simply often much faster and they have the infrastructure to support and encourage fast and easy biking.

    I think that the speed problem is definitely something SF shares–as excited as I am for the new Muni Metro cars it’ll still often be faster to just bike and as bike-specific infra improves more people in more situations are increasingly realizing that. The more this happens this is of course a cost-effective way for clearing up space for those who do choose to ride Muni Metro.

  2.  

    voltairesmistress

    Thank you for the thoughtful reply, Jdx. The linked articles are very interesting too.

  3.  

    Bruce

    Polk really needs yellow soft-hit posts on the double-yellow line in front of City Hall to prevent drivers from “Behaving Badly.” The very first week those new lanes on Polk were installed I sent pictures to the SFBC as evidence that they needed to push for them with the SFMTA.

  4.  

    Kevin J

    Another story said the the train are highly modular making for a lot of options the public will get to weigh in on.

    I hope the red one’s an option. They used Muni’s current colors in way I find way more attractive.

  5.  

    shamelessly

    Love it!

  6.  

    roymeo

    Needs a decision point on bike stolen, if No, probably a switch on whether or not you are killed by a car, if No: “Arrive 10 minutes early, sweaty.”

  7.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    1999 Proposition H “Ordinance Providing for the Extension of Caltrain to a Downtown Station”

    A world-class tragedy that the implementation of the policy by America’s Finest Transportation Planning Professionals is to piss away $4 billion public dollars for a worse than useless edifice that can never function as a remotely efficient train station. But the policy was sound, and had a part in effecting a turn around in city policy.

    I’m not totally naïve. The real reason policy changes is that somebody delivers a larger bag of unmarked hundreds to Willie Brown than the people who’d been who’d been doing so earlier. But it didn’t hurt.

  8.  

    C Monroe

    He is the Napster scumbag that helped Mark and his four co-founders find financing. He was played by Justin Timberlake in the movie.

  9.  

    C Monroe

    I like that guy though, not Parker.

  10.  

    Michael Cabanatuan

    Actually, AnsaldoBreda was invited to bid on the new cars but did not. Without explanation.

  11.  

    murphstahoe

    22nd and Church to Dolores Park?

  12.  

    murphstahoe

    I read some article about Tom Steyer and discovered he was the founder of Farallon. The first thing that came to mind was “Farallon? Isn’t that basically a place that writes investment bonds for Coal plants?”

    So I checked out Steyer’s wikipedia. Yep.

  13.  

    murphstahoe

    It’s just as wrong to stereotype “the rich” as if they all think and act as one as it would be to stereotype “the cyclists”

  14.  

    murphstahoe

    “people no longer trust science, evidence, and statistics. It’s a weird phenomenon, but it is reality”

    This is an easily explained phenomenon. Science in 1900 gives you a device that will cheaply and quickly get you from point A to point B without much physical effort or the pain of caring for a horse. Science is good! Science in 2000 tells you that this device you rely on has some devastating side-effects and you probably should not use it. Science is bad!

  15.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    Have any of the people advocating for bikes on Muni “light” rail vehicles ever visited San Francisco or ridden Muni?

    It’s asking for the the worst of all worlds. Apart from West Portal to Castro, it’s slower to take Muni than to just ride the damned bike pretty much anywhere. Getting bikes on and off high-floor “light” rail is a total disaster. And the trains are pretty much packed at all times, if only because of Muni “schedule adherence”. All that could be accomplished is to get in the way of the poor sardined downtrodden sods on the train who haven’t worked out the bike-is-faster thing.

    There really are about ten thousand better ways to make transportation in SF work better than to seek to hoist bikes up and into Muni trains.

  16.  

    shamelessly

    The Bold Italic chart suffers from windshield perspective. If you’re running late, you skip driving or transit, get on your bike, and you get there early (after almost getting killed by drivers). How hard would that have been to integrate? Instead over half the illustration is taken over by different motor vehicle modes (private car, taxi, and 2 ride-sharing services). And you can’t walk anywhere in SF? Really?

  17.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    The oddest thing about US “transit activist” (often really just “railfans” in disguise, with a big hankering for steam-era everything) is just how much the enjoy wallowing in filth.

    “Yes, mistakes may have been made, but get with the program! We’re making more mistakes, and we’re doing it Our Way, so quit with the Yurpeen this and the Japan that and cost-effective whatever and always remember to vote for more money for Muni.”

    High floor trams were and remain a massive mistake, and one that was almost trivial to fix in the 1990s (exactly the same quality of America’s Finest Transportation Planning Professional were staffing Muni and leeching at Booz-Allen as are running the joint today FYI) and one that remains a mistake which could be rectified in a straightforward enough way today.

    The costs are minor. The transition period could be simple, especially being concurrent with progressive total fleet replacement. The long-term benefits are immense, measured in the hundreds of millions.

    But let’s just keep shooting ourselves in the head, forever, because NEW AND SHINY. Don’t question! Obey!

    After all, changing “light” rail vendors will surely turn everything around at Muni. Next stop: Central Subway!

    Also WTF with the stupid little stumpy two-part cars? Nobody operating a real urban system wastes so much cash and so much platform space and so much interior space and so much maintenance cost on so many control cabs and couplers. It’s like Muni thinks it is San Jose in 1985 or Berlin in 1885 or something. Sure, order a mixed fleet with some shorties in the mix for the J, but there’s no way that itsy dumb little wasteful 23m long toonerville trolleys should be the mainstay of any real city’s urban rail fleet.

    Long, articulated, low-floor. Everybody’s doing it. Everybody with a clue.

    Muni. Putting yesterday in the future, today.

  18.  

    JJ94117

    from the MIssion Bay article: “It’s simply naïve to expect that these very same companies that have been fragrantly violating our law for years will not continue to demonstrate the same rogue behavior once this project begins,” Shortt said.

    “Fragrantly”?

  19.  

    Karen Lynn Allen

    Siemens produces the tram light rail cars used in Amsterdam. When I rode on one there two years ago, it was so silent and smooth I was actually indignant that we still ride on such noisy, clunky, badly-engineered $#@! when such technology was available. (It was also incredibly clean and spotlessly maintained.) I’m not surprised that the reliability and maintenance costs of the Siemens products are also much better than Breda. However the quality of our tracks will also partially determine noise, smoothness, reliability and maintenance costs over time.

    I will point out that the Dutch charge far more for rides on their trams and metro system than we do. A basic hour pass is the equivalent of $3.60, and the monthly passes are $116 regular and $77 for children and seniors. The farebox recovery ratio for the Amsterdam system is 41% whereas for SF Muni it is 22-25%. This may partially explain why the quality of Amsterdam public transit is higher than ours, (and also why biking is more popular than taking transit in Amsterdam.)

  20.  

    Alex

  21.  

    Alex

    Major improvement for Muni. These trains look modern and I enjoy the use of LED for the headlights giving them the flexibility to come up with some cool designs. I hope they add floor to ceiling poles by the entrances and digital screens(If you don’t know what i’m talking about go to pg 58 http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/786015/s200-design-book.pdf). I think it will be interesting seeing Breda and Siemens cars coupled up together and I can’t wait to see four car trains in the subway. Even though I know they won’t I hope the choose both the designs illustrated in this post, those are my favorite, but I really like the red one. I can’t wait to see the Bay Area in a decade with Caltrain, Bart, and Muni having changed their fleet with more modern European like trains.

  22.  

    Justin

    Does that include that “restore transportation balance” ballot measure as well??

  23.  

    Mario Tanev

    I often see the argument that SFMTA should enforce time limits, instead of enforcing meters. If that’s what SFMTA did, however, a larger percentage of its revenues would come from fines than from up-front revenue. This is contrary to what the entire city agrees should happen – make a legible system where most revenue comes from up-front fees. If revenue is shown to be 90% from fines, imagine the outrage then. Plus, consider that the Sunday church protesters were also protesting enforcement of double parking. To them, ANY enforcement, for any reason would be a reason to protest. Put this fallacy to bed.

  24.  

    Chris

    In the UK both the Manchester and Birmingham designs by Ansaldo Breda are being retired earlier than anticipated, the latter in particular have a terrible reputation for reliability. You get what you pay for at the end of the day.

  25.  

    BBnet3000

    Right, nobody should consider convenience and comfort for the passengers or speed of boarding and alighting, as well as handicapped accessibility.

    They’re just something “transit nerds” care about, as opposed to control software and operating procedures, which are things regular people think about. /s

  26.  

    vcs

    I’m tired of this transit nerd obsession with low floors.

    Muni Metro is fundamentally screwy in both design and operation. We could spend billions on real service improvements — and by that I mean new ROWs and subway extensions and more trains and turnarounds — before low floors would even make a noticeable difference.

    The trains are crap, the rails are crap, the control software is crap, the operations are crap. But apparently a lot of people think “low floors” is what will solve our ills.

  27.  

    vcs

    The bus routes will continue on their current lines once they leave the BRT corridor. So, no expensive incompatible busses required (thankfully).

  28.  

    coolbabybookworm

    I saw signature gatherers at Safeway in the Richmond, which is hilarious because it was asking people to “restore balance” in a sea of free Safeway parking, surrounded by streets that aren’t even RPP for several blocks. I guess they still need more parking by building a parking garage in the avenues? The one under the museums isn’t enough I guess…

  29.  

    Yaro

    Wow. What an asshat.
    I guess he thinks this is his way of “giving back to the community”. It’s for the people, right?

  30.  

    anonymouse

    LA got Breda LRVs that ended up overweight and underperforming, though I don’t know that they have a terrible MDBF. They decided to cancel the contract after the initial 50 (they had options for 100 more) and go with a different manufacturer, even though that ended up resulting in a temporary shortage of cars for the new lines they’re opening next year. LA also has Breda subway trains, and while they’re not terrible, I definitely have seen them break down more than once.

    Boston has Breda LRVs that ended up having brake problems and also derailing on switches and curve. It took nearly a decade from first delivery until they were all working properly, and even then, the MBTA ended up not taking delivery of the full order. I don’t know how they’re doing now reliability-wise, but I think they’re also headed for an early replacement in a few years.

  31.  

    Yaro

    No kidding. Also, since free parking is being paid for from the tax money he will be paying the most for it.

  32.  

    Aron

    The Stadler DMU is designed as a heavy rail(european terminology) train. The Siemens train are specifically light rail. So standard features and options differ.

  33.  

    Justin

    Looks pretty good so far, hope it will be, just wish that again just like BART, that Muni would allow for the public to see the designs in person before building the final production

  34.  

    RoyTT

    Tony’s idea actually makes more sense because the opposition to meters in residential areas isn’t just the cost itself but the hassle of running out of your home to feed coins into meters.

    People accept the idea of paying to park in congested commercial areas because it increases the probability of actually being able to park there at all. But it’s a different matter when it comes to parking at or near your own home.

    So give residents a free pass to park in their metered neighborhood, which could be easily checked by their RPP, and residents may well support parking meters in the same way that they support RPP’s – because it makes it easier to park on your own street.

    I suspect residents would even pay more for the RPP if it gave them immunity from local meters.

    SFMTA’s resultant extra ability to then impose meters in residential areas should more than pay for any revenues lost from non-paying residents. The key is, after all, getting these new meters implemented in the first place, so why make obvious enemies? Everyone is happy for someone else to pay.

  35.  

    BBnet3000

    Are you just going to start commenting this on my comments? I comment on articles im interested in rather than following other commenters around.

  36.  

    Dexter Wong

    Looks like we got a winner this time, Siemens is well known in light rail circles. (Funny thing, in 1971, Muni wanted to buy streetcars from Duewag (now part of Siemens) but couldn’t due to federal buy American rules. Now that the rules have changed and Siemens wanted to bid on the Muni contract, we finally get what we want.)

  37.  

    Dexter Wong

    The only good thing I’ve heard about Breda cars was about the Cleveland light rail cars. They were built in the early 80s and are still running.

  38.  

    Dexter Wong

    Are you going to keep pointing out a bad decision made 40 years ago when no one had a clear idea of what transit agencies would do about the high/low floor problem? It was over a decade later that most light rail systems settled on low floors.

  39.  

    RestoringSanity

    Dear Jason,

    First a few corrections. You have 2 third points. You misspelled SFMTA. Not inspiring much confidence here.

    Second, I remember your 2012 campaign (which we all know was all about getting you name recognition) and it makes sense you’re now spearheading this initiative as you know how populist these kinds of things are and how great it will be for your political career.

    Third, I have to ask, do you even own a car? If not, then why are you bothering? Do you honestly feel sorry for all the poor drivers out there having to pay for parking meters from the goodness of your heart? Or is this some kind of move where deep down you know this is disastrous policy but of course, one major beneficiary is you, being able to claim victory and perhaps the privilege of a nomination for an office that you, as a Republican, might actually win?

  40.  

    p_chazz

    I remember MUNI made the same glowing remarks about the Bredas when they replaced the Boeing Vertol cars…

  41.  

    NoeValleyJim

    True dat. Tom Steyer is pretty cool, an environmentalist and willing to put his money where his mouth is.

  42.  

    NoeValleyJim

    Good luck at the polls, you will need it!

  43.  

    p_chazz

    A tech billionaire is the tea party? Hardly. The phrase “tea party” seems to have lost all meaning and become an all purpose pejorative.

  44.  

    Andy B from Jersey

    Looks great!

    Bike racks on the trains? Most German train products have them as standard equipment. The Stadler GmbH DMU on the RiverLINE in New Jersey has them and they never needed to institute a rush hour bike ban because they are so space efficient and work VERY well.

  45.  

    p_chazz

    As if you would know.

  46.  

    p_chazz

    It’s just as wrong to stereotype “the rich” as if they all think and act as one as it would be to stereotype “the gays” or “the blacks.”

  47.  

    Fran w.

    I mostly ride my bike, very occasionally drive. As both a biker and a driver I have seen the majority of cyclists completely ignore the rules of the road. Why do you think drivers are harassing cyclists? Because many cyclists are rude and dangerous. So much so that car drivers have been “trained” to allow bikes to run stop signs on a regular basis. And the self righteous and entitlement of many bikers is sickening. I guarantee if bikers began following the laws, we would not need a harassment law. Remember, all rights come with responsibilities to uphold your part. Follow the laws, people! Stop being a menace. I find that drivers are thoroughly confused by me because I follow the laws. They are expecting all bikers to run stop signs and traffic lights and are terrified of hitting someone. The situation in Berkeley is highly annoying and dangerous. From my perspective, I really do think the poor behavior is usually on the end of the bicyclist.

  48.  

    Jeffy

    Do you ever leave your spider hole to go out or do you continuously comment on everything? You really seem to have the answer to everything. Put that brilliance to use. Start executing and stop commenting. The world really could use you.

  49.  

    Richard Mlynarik

    Historic Streetcars!

    20 years out of date today, 40 years out of date when they’re finally retired.

    America’s Finest Transportation Planning Professionals, on the job.

    Made in California! USA! USA! USA!

  50.  

    Gordon Werner

    Breda makes shoddy products. In Copenhagen their Breda trams are rusting … in the Netherlands their high-speed trains can’t be used because of snow buildup. in Seattle our dual-mode Breda trolleybuses were grossly overweight and were constant maintenance pigs.

    it goes on and on and on.

    Siemens on the other hand … makes rather outstanding products and being that their long-time factory is in Sacramento … they can actually offer decent support to MUNI