New Poll: Public Supports Congestion Tolling Over Gas Tax Hike by 2 to 1

InfoGraphics3.jpg(Graphic: HTNB)

The puzzle of how to pay for new federal investments in transportation is the single greatest stumbling block facing members of Congress — should a gas tax increase be combined with a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax? How about a national infrastructure bank that leverages private capital?

A poll released today by the engineering firm HTNB suggests that higher gas taxes could continue to face political headwinds from both sides of the aisle, even after the recession begins to ease.

A 10-cent gas tax increase that would be imposed only after two straight quarters of economic growth faced opposition from 64 percent of respondents, and just 16 percent said gas taxes should be raised to pay for "roads and bridges."

the poll found strikingly strong support for tolling, particularly
congestion tolling through HOT (high-occupancy toll) lanes. One-third
of respondents said HOT lanes should be used for future transportation
revenue, with 35 percent supporting the use of public tolling and 20
percent backing private tolls.

As with any poll, wording
is everything; the above graphic depicts another poll question that
referenced high-speed rail in addition to road investments. When the
phrasing was changed, support for gas taxes climbed by 8 percent.

when respondents were asked about "adding" HOT lanes with higher tolls
"during rush hour," 68 percent were willing to support the move. As my
colleague Ryan Avent has pointed out, however, new HOT lanes can be added without building more highway capacity by simply converting existing lanes.

lawmakers are looking for data to jumpstart a discussion of broader
toll use — particularly on the interstates, which would deliver a blow
to the road lobby — today’s poll might be a good place to start.

source of polls can often be as noteworthy as their phrasing. Given
that, one quick note on HTNB: The firm is currently embroiled in a
debate over streetcars versus light rail in Kansas City, according to local media reports.)

  • patrick

    Hmm… I suspect HNTB stands to make a lot of money installing tolling equipment and building the new HOT lanes, while a simple gas tax would cost nothing to implement (therefore no revenue for them) and reduce future construction needs.

  • A lot of respondents think “I have to buy gas but I won’t use the HOT lanes, so if we go to congestion pricing someone else pays, not me”. Of course, once implemented (assuming the HOT lane was a conversion of an existing lane) then all hell would break loose as those who don’t want to pay for the HOT lane complain about the congestion.

  • SFResident

    I think that John Murphy decoded this poll pretty well. People are most likely to “support” the kinds of tolls and taxes that they don’t think they themselves will have to pay. This is why a patently stupid idea like increasing public transit fares to pay for “expanding highway capacity” gets more support than increasing the gasoline tax.

    All that this poll demonstrates is that people are pretty selfish.

  • Ridiculous.

  • A Chamber of Commerce poll earlier this year found little support for congestion pricing in San Francisco.


Obama Administration Refuses to Consider New Transpo Funding

Having entertained legislators’ own ideas about how best to fund future transportation spending, the House Ways and Means committee turned to representatives from the administration and key interest groups today to hear their thoughts on the matter. The administration’s view could not have been much clearer — this business is all very important, but we’re […]