“Bicycling Is Healthy” — So How Do We Encourage It?

Today, a bit of a Transatlantic love on the Streetsblog Network, as Copenhagenize posts about a new paper on how to increase bicycling rates from Rutgers urban planning prof John Pucher. Copenhagenize’s Mikael Colville-Andersen writes:

JohnnyCropNYCskyline2.jpgRutgers urban planning professor John Pucher’s new paper talks about ways to increase the use of bicycles.

The newest paper is impressive for its amazing amount of scientific
references. Truly a thorough work, as well an an inspirational one…

There
are also some stat boxes near the end in the reference area that
highlight the increasing mobility in cities choosing to embrace bicycle
culture [including Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam and Copenhagen]. It’s not really a newsflash, but increased bicycle
infrastructure reduces injury, as well as all the health and societal
benefits. So let’s build those cycle tracks.

Pucher’s latest paper, available for download here,
is co-written by Jennifer Dill of Portland State University and Susan
Handy of the University of California, Davis. It starts with a
statement that is, unfortunately, still somewhat radical in the United
States: "Bicycling is healthy." (This being an academic work, it backs
that statement up with a number of citations.)

The authors go
on to discuss a number of factors that influence the number of people
who choose to use bikes for transportation — different types of bike
lanes, secure parking, access to the bicycles themselves and other
variables.

Their conclusion is that there is no magic bullet that will increase cycling rates:

Some
individual interventions can increase bicycling to varying degrees, but
the increases are usually not large. That does not mean that individual
interventions are not important, but they are most effective as part of
a more comprehensive effort. Substantial increases in bicycling require
an integrated package of many different, complementary interventions,
including infrastructure provision and pro-bicycle programs, as well as
supportive land use planning and restrictions on car use.

The
question for policymakers is if they have the will to implement such
coordinated changes. It is, after all, about public health.

More from the network: The Transport Politic looks at different commuter rail options in Kansas City, Missouri. Tulsa Alternative Transportation Examiner reports on the use of grant money by police departments to crack down on pedestrians and cyclists. And Worldchanging looks at the possibility for slower tourism in the future.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

This Week: EBBC Celebrates 40 Years of Bike Advocacy

|
This week, the East Bay Bicycle Coalition celebrates four decades of advocacy, transport economics guru John Pucher talks biking and walking at UC Berkeley, and the Green Building Conference tours SF streets. Here are all the highlights from the Streetsblog calendar: Wednesday (SJ) and Friday (SF): SPUR Forum: Using Social Networks to Improve Transport Planning. SPUR brings this […]

Bike Bans: A Serious Threat to Safe Routes to School

|
Banned in NJ: Many Jersey towns don’t allow kids to bike to school. Photo: Voorhees Transportation Center Image Library, Leigh Ann Von Hagen. This May, a bill surfaced in the U.S. Senate that would triple federal funding for Safe Routes to School programs. Livable Streets Community activists have been on the case this week, mobilizing […]