“Bicycling Is Healthy” — So How Do We Encourage It?

Today, a bit of a Transatlantic love on the Streetsblog Network, as Copenhagenize posts about a new paper on how to increase bicycling rates from Rutgers urban planning prof John Pucher. Copenhagenize’s Mikael Colville-Andersen writes:

JohnnyCropNYCskyline2.jpgRutgers urban planning professor John Pucher’s new paper talks about ways to increase the use of bicycles.

The newest paper is impressive for its amazing amount of scientific
references. Truly a thorough work, as well an an inspirational one…

There
are also some stat boxes near the end in the reference area that
highlight the increasing mobility in cities choosing to embrace bicycle
culture [including Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam and Copenhagen]. It’s not really a newsflash, but increased bicycle
infrastructure reduces injury, as well as all the health and societal
benefits. So let’s build those cycle tracks.

Pucher’s latest paper, available for download here,
is co-written by Jennifer Dill of Portland State University and Susan
Handy of the University of California, Davis. It starts with a
statement that is, unfortunately, still somewhat radical in the United
States: "Bicycling is healthy." (This being an academic work, it backs
that statement up with a number of citations.)

The authors go
on to discuss a number of factors that influence the number of people
who choose to use bikes for transportation — different types of bike
lanes, secure parking, access to the bicycles themselves and other
variables.

Their conclusion is that there is no magic bullet that will increase cycling rates:

Some
individual interventions can increase bicycling to varying degrees, but
the increases are usually not large. That does not mean that individual
interventions are not important, but they are most effective as part of
a more comprehensive effort. Substantial increases in bicycling require
an integrated package of many different, complementary interventions,
including infrastructure provision and pro-bicycle programs, as well as
supportive land use planning and restrictions on car use.

The
question for policymakers is if they have the will to implement such
coordinated changes. It is, after all, about public health.

More from the network: The Transport Politic looks at different commuter rail options in Kansas City, Missouri. Tulsa Alternative Transportation Examiner reports on the use of grant money by police departments to crack down on pedestrians and cyclists. And Worldchanging looks at the possibility for slower tourism in the future.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Lessons from Copenhagen for Bicycling in the Bay Area

|
Bicyclists — and blue bike lanes and physically separated bikeways — abound in Copenhagen, where biking makes up 37 percent of the trips to work and school. Photos by Leah Shahum Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of dispatches from Copenhagen and Amsterdam from Leah Shahum, the executive director of the San […]

Berlin’s Striking Cycling Renaissance

|
Berlin is a hugely under-appreciated cycling city. Often overshadowed by the accomplishments of Amsterdam and Copenhagen, over the past two decades Berlin has quietly experienced what is perhaps the most striking cycling renaissance in the world. On any given day, more trips are now made by bicycle in Berlin than any other European city. Berlin […]

SPUR Talk: What About the Families?

|
How can San Francisco keep families from moving away? That was the central question of a panel discussion this afternoon hosted by the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR). The panel included Susan Exline of the San Francisco Planning Department, Daniel Parolek, architect with Opticos Design, and San Francisco’s District Seven […]