Defining the ‘Public’ in Public-Private Partnerships

In a must-read
piece
for the Center for Public Integrity (CPI), Matt Lewis digs
deeper into the network of cities and towns that employ D.C.
transportation. He begins with a thought-provoking anecdote:

ibmribboncutting.jpgA ribbon-cutting in Dubuque, IA, for
IBM’s new tech center. (Photo: Gazette)

Last
September, city fathers in Dubuque, Iowa, lured three members of
the White House cabinet to the banks of the Mississippi River on the
same day they welcomed officials from one the world’s biggest
corporations, IBM. …

Meanwhile, Dubuque’s private sector guest, IBM, was over at the
convention center announcing plans to make the city a living laboratory
for its Smarter Planet
program. Up to 1,300 new IBM employees will begin fielding tech service
calls later this year at the Roshek building, and the company hopes
those workers will also be able to enjoy the fruits of a sweeping
partnership between IBM and its host city — a partnership aimed at
creating an integrated transportation system involving smart new bus
routes, pedestrian-friendly streets, and arterial roads to take trucks
out of neighborhoods.

It sounds positively idyllic, but there is, of course, a catch.

That catch was a $50 million federal investment — and though it
would be technically correct to say Dubuque was seeking a handout from
Washington, it’s in good company. More than 650 localities have
lobbyists chasing federal transportation funding on their behalf,
according to the CPI.

So perhaps Dubuque’s quest is simply part of the un-grand scheme by
which transportation money flows to states and metro areas. But with
the city offering a reported $22 million in incentives to attract a deal
with IBM, which has already
started
work on its new tech service center, is the federal
government the right partner for the project?


Thinking broadly, Dubuque’s type of public-private partnership
would be a natural fit for the National Infrastructure Bank that is attracting
new momentum as part of the Capitol Hill job-creation push. If a city
and a company need help financing a project that promises to be the
first step in an urban revitalization, that funding should be easier to
get than it is now — from private as well as public sources.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Bay Area Needs More Walkable Housing, Not Google Bus Bashing

|
The anger of the protestors who blockaded a Google bus in the Mission on Monday was very real and understandable. San Francisco residents, living in a highly sought-after city with a limited housing supply, are coping with a crisis of skyrocketing rents and evictions. Meanwhile, Muni riders increasingly find their stops blocked by private shuttles that appear […]
SFMTA painting the bus 'Red Carpet' lanes on Mission in the Mission a couple of years back. Photo: SFMTA.

Open Thread: Room for Private Vehicles in Red Carpet Lanes?

|
The SFMTA Board of Directors approved the next step in the $35 million Geary Rapid project on Tuesday, which includes segments of red carpet, bus-only lanes between Stanyan and downtown. The rub: the SFMTA decided to allow privately run transit, including tour buses, tech-buses, and Chariot, to also use the lane (in reality, non-Muni vehicles of […]

New Colored Transit Lanes Coming to Church Street Next Month

|
New red-colored transit lanes are slated to be implemented on a section of Church Street in September in a SF Municipal Transportation Agency pilot project to speed up the J-Church and 22-Fillmore lines. Following the T-Third line, it would be the second time San Francisco has used colored paint on transit-only lanes to help clarify that […]