SamTrans Plans For Rapid Buses on El Camino Real, Just Not Anytime Soon

SamTrans’ ECR route runs every 15 minutes on weekdays and every 20 minutes on weekends along El Camino Real between Daly City and Palo Alto. Photo: munidave/Flickr

Last week, SamTrans released its first study of potential Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service along El Camino Real in San Mateo County, from Daly City to Palo Alto. BRT could reduce travel times for bus passengers by up to 25 percent thanks to express skip-stop service and transit signal priority. Faster bus service would attract 3,100 to 5,600 more riders by 2020, depending on how much additional bus service is added.

But adding new service would cost money — anywhere from $5.7 million to $10.3 million annually — and without any additional operating funds, SamTrans isn’t expected to launch such express bus service anytime soon.

In the meantime, the transit agency will set the stage for faster buses by pursuing $2.4 million in capital grant funds for transit signal priority. If implemented, that will allow buses to extend the green phase of 120 traffic signals along El Camino by a few seconds, avoiding delays for bus passengers.

“We would love to get the traffic signal priority in for the existing ECR route,” said SamTrans planner Barrow Emerson. “What it does is really improve the reliability of a bus service, because you’re staying on schedule.”

SamTrans officials say dedicated bus lanes on most of El Camino Real aren’t feasible, because the street is too narrow for four lanes of auto traffic and bus lanes. Image: VTA

The study, conducted by Emerson over the past year, also included an analysis of a long-term “Full BRT” scenario, including dedicated bus lanes and enhanced bus stops with level boarding and similar to proposals from other transit agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Full BRT would slash trip times by another 25 percent, on top of the savings provided by express skip-stop service. Only 11 miles of bus lanes were included in the scenario, keeping at least four lanes for car traffic along all of El Camino Real. Ridership would reach 34,000 each weekday by 2040 under this scenario, and building dedicated bus lanes and enhanced bus stops would cost about $150 million.


The number of passengers choosing SamTrans Route ECR (for “El Camino Real”) has risen steadily from just over 11,000 to nearly 13,000 each weekday ever since the route was created by combining two existing routes in August 2013. This doubled frequency from every 30 minutes to every 15 minutes, improved on-time reliability, and simplified passengers’ trips, since every bus serves every stop along the 27 miles of El Camino between Daly City’s BART station and the Palo Alto Caltrain Station.

SamTrans officials cited an improving economy and an overcrowded Caltrain as other reasons for ECR’s recent growth in ridership. “Caltrain is now reaching capacity in the peak commute hour, so people are looking for an alternative if they’ve got a shorter distance to travel,” said SamTrans and Caltrain communications manager Jayme Ackemann.

The BRT study anticipates weekday ridership on Route ECR to grow by roughly 600 every year thanks to new development along El Camino, and even without service improvements would reach 16,600 passengers by 2020. An “ECR Rapid” express service stopping only at 37 high-activity bus stops between Daly City and Palo Alto could reduce bus trip times by up to 25 percent compared to today’s ECR bus, which serves just over 100 stops in each direction and averages a leisurely 11 miles per hour.

“In the immediate, near-term future, we don’t have the money to do this,” said Emerson of express bus service and dedicated lanes for buses. “We’ll keep this on our radar, watch our financial situation, and see if anything changes.”

These four maps, arranged north to south, show the 37 stops where a “Rapid ECR” bus would stop. A Rapid service would cut travel times by up to 25 percent compared to today’s ECR bus. Image: SamTrans

Muni, AC Transit, and VTA have all operated “rapid” skip-stop bus service, similar to what SamTrans is analyzing, for many years. They also plan to phase in implementation of Bus Rapid Transit on many of those lines, including dedicated bus lanes.

In 2005, the Valley Transportation Authority introduced Rapid 522, along the 19 miles of El Camino from Palo Alto to downtown San Jose within Santa Clara County. Rapid 522 buses stop at only 32 of the 147 bus stops (in both directions) served by the local 22 bus, cutting trip times by 20 to 25 percent during rush hour. The combined weekday ridership on VTA’s local and express buses along El Camino Real in 2013 was 12,500 passengers, about the same as for SamTrans’ ECR.

VTA is now constructing dedicated bus lanes for its 522 buses for the section of the route running through eastern San Jose, and will seek approval for new dedicated bus lanes on El Camino Real next year. The dedicated lanes will make travel times faster and more reliable, especially at peak hours. AC Transit and Muni are also pursuing full BRT services on some of their existing express bus routes.

  • Ted King

    This doubled frequency from every 30 minutes to every 15 minutes,

    There was already quarter-hour service for those who could ride either the 390 or the 391 (e.g. Millbrae/Burlingame to Daly City). All the ECR does is make it a consistent fifteen-minute (15 min.) interval over a longer route.

  • street_user

    “SamTrans officials say dedicated bus lanes on most of El Camino Real aren’t feasible, because the street is too narrow for four lanes of auto traffic and bus lanes.”

    hilarious!

  • Andy Chow

    El Camino is quite narrow in certain segments like in Burlingame, Downtown Redwood City, and Downtown Menlo Park. The segment in Burlingame is even narrower than The Alameda in San Jose, which VTA is NOT proposing to build dedicated bus lanes in all BRT alternatives.

    I am reluctant to assume that any bus lane is good or that somehow BRT must have most of the features of rail including level boarding. The Peninsula has Caltrain and BART so the role for buses should be mostly for local transit. While I think there’s an opportunity for limited stop bus service on El Camino I don’t think the Peninsula is ready for dedicated bus lanes. However features like queue jump lanes can be very useful.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

VTA’s Vision for Bus Rapid Transit on El Camino Real

|
A new video from the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) lays out the vision for transforming El Camino Real into a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor connecting the Palo Alto Transit Center and Downtown San Jose. It’s part of VTA’s Valley Rapid project, a set of three BRT routes planned in Santa Clara County. The El […]

TransForum: How Bus Rapid Transit can transform public transportation

|
From TransForm: Bus tour and talk on how Bus Rapid Transit can transform public transportation RSVP online by Friday, October 7 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is revolutionizing bus service around the world with its dedicated lanes, state-of-the-art buses, and frequent service.  Now, Bus Rapid Transit is coming to Santa Clara County! VTA is planning for BRT lines along the Alum Rock, El Camino, […]

San Mateo County Still Thinks the Wider the Better

|
San Mateo County’s City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) is leaving an expansion of Highway 101 with new carpool lanes on the table, even after the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) concluded they will jam up with traffic the day they open. If constructed–by 2024 at the earliest–a 14-mile section of the highway from San Bruno to Redwood City would be widened from eight to […]