And there’s a reason these stories are so popular. For whatever reason, the Los Angeles Times has decided that high-speed rail is a bad project, and legislators seem keen to defund it and use the money for projects in their districts.
But while the Times pats itself on the back for ostensibly being a government watchdog, they tell only half the story. For example, thousands of well-paying union construction jobs are on the line in the Central Valley as the nation’s largest infrastructure project steams forward. So is a once-in-a-generation chance to change how people move about in California and reduce emissions from short-haul flights and cars.
Our coverage of high speed rail shows Streetsblog’s importance in two ways.
First, as noted above, the Times’s coverage of the California High-Speed Rail Program is full of half-truths and spin designed to twist every announcement into a scandal. It makes any casual reader believe the project is dead. Much of the rest of the California media just apes the Times’s coverage or prints nonsense from petroleum-funded think tanks.
Second, it is another demonstration of the Streetsblog mission: to inform readers on why things are happening the way they are. We take that charge seriously, even when it means upsetting a politician who is an important ally on our other key issues such as safe walking and biking.
If you value Streetsblog’s coverage, please consider making a donation to support loud and proud independent coverage of High Speed Rail and many other issues.
As always, I’m happy to answer any questions, provide information on how to setup employer matches or anything else at damien@streetsblog.org.
No other field would tolerate this level of death and destruction. The tragedy of West Portal is more evidence that the traffic engineering profession is fundamentally broken