Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In
Climate Change

State Senator Takes on Parking Requirements

3_2_09_lowenthal_1.jpg

Last week, State Senator Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) introduced
legislation that takes aim at how California's municipalities think
about parking and parking requirements.  What SB 518 (PDF) is missing in co-sponsors it makes up for in chutzpah.  If enacted, the
legislation would require that every municipality in the state earn at
least "20 points" in parking reforms.  These reforms range from
eliminating a city's parking requirement for development, which is
worth 20 points to requiring that employers offer transit passes en
lieu of parking worth only 2 points.

In Los Angeles, the bill would
have an amazing impact on transportation planning if it were to become
law.  Immediately the city would be forced to think of building
transit-oriented development without the minimum two car spaces for
every residential unit, or setting aside part of its parking fees for
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. 

However, getting
this legislation passed and signed is going to be a heavy lift. 
Despite the many positive impacts that parking reform would have for
the transportation network and environment by reducing V.M.T., there are
bound to be a lot of pro-automobile forces pushing back against the
legislation and so far there has been almost sign of a campaign
promoting it.  As a matter of fact, the only place I found this
legislation mentioned was Infosnack,
a blog originating out of Washington, D.C.  In other words, seeing this
legislation passed into law may be a heavy lift; but then most things
worth doing are.

Highlights of the point system include (and clearly someone has been reading Don Shoup):

    • 20 points - Eliminate minimum parking requirements citywide or within the unincorporated county
    • 10 points - Eliminate minimum parking requirements for projects in transit intensive areas.
    • 10 points - Adopt an ordinance to set on-street parking meter and public parking lot and garage rates to achieve an 85% target occupancy rate during hours when adjacent businesses are open or employ demand-responsive rates that vary throughout the day to achieve an 85% target occupancy rate.
    • 10 points - Remove or increase allowable density limits and floor area ratios (FAR), allowing infill development on existing parking lots.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Streetsblog SF editor Roger Rudick offers constructive criticism of Chicago’s downtown bike network

"There were blocks that felt very safe and very secure," he said. "But then you're immediately – voom! – disgorged into three lanes of moving traffic with no protection."

April 26, 2024

Commentary: There is Zero Ambiguity to the West Portal Tragedy

What happened in West Portal was entirely predictable and preventable. The city must now close Ulloa to through traffic and make sure it can never happen again

April 25, 2024
See all posts