LaHood, Biden Meet with Governors on High-Speed Rail

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Vice President Biden met at the
White House this afternoon with officials from 20 states in contention
for funding as part of the Obama administration’s high-speed rail program.

midwest_rail_map_300x211.jpgThe high-speed Midwest Regional Rail Initiative’s proposed reach. (Photo: Michigan Messenger)

"This
is how the interstate highway system started, folks," Biden told the
governors, according to the pool report filed by the White House press
corps. "It wasn’t like the Lord on the eighth day said — boom! —
there’s
the interstate highway system."

The group included eight governors — from Michigan,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin, Illinois, Massachusetts, Georgia and
Missouri — but not New York’s David Paterson, who’s taking some flak from a Democratic state legislator for his decision to focus on legislative priorities in Albany.

Applications
are due this summer for the $8 billion in high-speed rail money that
was added to the economic stimulus bill, and detailed guidance on that
process is slated for release by month’s end.

It’s still
unclear, though, how many projects are in line for a share of that pot,
not to mention the passenger demand and matching-funds requirements
that rail proposals would have to meet.

As Sarah pointed out in her Streetsblog Network post today, directing the money to the most high-demand areas remains a key concern for transportation planners.

Another unanswered question is whether Congress will sign on to the administration’s pitch for $5 billion in annual high-speed rail funding over the next five years. LaHood is headed to the House Appropriations Committee tomorrow morning, where part of his job will be to sell that long-term rail investment to his former colleagues on the Hill.

Meanwhile,
the most well-represented corridor at the meeting appears to be the
Midwest Regional Rail Initiative, which would link Chicago with St.
Louis, the Detroit area, Wisconsin and the Twin Cities of Minnesota. In
an April letter
to LaHood, governors from that region estimated the cost of their
high-speed rail corridor at $3.4 billion, using 3,000 miles of track
that don’t require negotiations over rights-of-way.

Midwestern senators are also working the phones
to ensure that freight rail doesn’t stand in the way of an expansion of
high-speed passenger service. Will the Midwest initiative’s political
might — both LaHood and the president are Illinoisans — help vault it
ahead of the competition?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Will Georgia’s Next Governor ‘Unclog Atlanta’?

|
This is the final installment of our series on high-stakes governor’s races. We hope you’ll be watching along with us tonight as the results come in for the races we’ve followed in Florida, Wisconsin, Ohio, California, Texas, Maryland, Colorado, and Tennessee. Now, we turn to Georgia. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told Georgians two weeks ago, […]

California High Speed Rail Central Valley Corridor Gets Federal Grant

|
The U.S. Department of Transportation announced $2.4 billion in grants for high speed and commuter rail projects around the country today, including $900 million for various portions of California’s rail network and High-Speed Rail project. US DOT Secretary Ray LaHood compared the initial investment in high-speed rail networks across the country under the Obama Administration […]

LaHood Faces Off With GOP Senator Over High-Speed Rail, Livability

|
When Cabinet secretaries appear in front of Congress’ appropriations committees, which control the annual budgets for each federal agency, the proceedings tend to be dry affairs dominated by local concerns and arcane fiscal debates. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) (Photo: Politico) But Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s visit with Senate appropriators today was anything but humdrum, as […]
STREETSBLOG USA

LaHood: Rail Is the Way Forward

|
Last week in Philadelphia, the Obama Administration unveiled its comprehensive plan to connect 80 percent of Americans by high-speed rail. And it wasn’t long before the proposal attracted critics, like Robert J. Samuelson of the Washington Post. Much of the blowback centers around the argument that rail is too costly at a time when budgets […]