Residents Upset Over Outer Richmond Muni Service Cuts

bus.jpgPhoto: Susan Vaughan

The MTA, in the middle of a $129 million budget
shortfall, plans to reduce bus service to the outer avenues at various
points in the Richmond District, already one of the most difficult parts of San Francisco to reach via
public transportation.

“It sucks,” said Richmond resident Sandy Newport who lives near
40th and Fulton and works at 12th and Clement and was specifically concerned about plans to eliminate the
38-Ocean Beach bus.  “I’m a hairdresser, and
I have lots of elderly clients who depend on the bus to come here and
get food,” she said as she waited for the bus outside the Safeway at La
Playa and Cabrillo.

At the same time that bus service will be reduced, fares
will go up.  Starting July 1, the one-time fare will go from $1.50 to
$2.00; fast Passes will go from $45 to $55, and then to $60 by January
1, 2010; and the new Fast Passes will no longer be BART-enabled. 
Richmond residents who take buses downtown and then transfer to BART to
go to the Mission District or beyond will now have to pay an extra $10
for a pass that will also work on BART within the City.  The Senior,
Youth, and Disabled Pass will go from the current $10 to $15 in July
and to $20 by January 1.

“I
don’t care if they raise the fare,” said Newport.  “I’d rather pay more
and have the service than have to walk further and wait longer.  It
doesn’t seem fair that they are doing both.”

A rider waiting for the 38 at Cabrillo near La Playa who wouldn’t identify himself noted that part of the
current budget debacle was due to the passage of the 2007 Proposition A
charter amendment that turned the operator salary into a floor,
dictated by operator pay for the two highest paid public transportation
systems in the country.

Mira, a Russian immigrant on a fixed income, had not known about
the increases in passes for seniors. When she found out, she spoke
for herself and her husband.  “I think it’s too much,” she said,
shaking her head.

Another rider, Lina Chao, thought the increases in bus fares were
unavoidable.  “The price of oil and the salaries of employees are
increasing,” she said, though she was not pleased about the route
changes. “It will be very inconvenient, especially to go
to the Safeway.”

To try to address concerns like these, MTA Executive
Director Nat Ford wrote in a May 22 memo that fare increases and service cutbacks could be
mitigated by potential service enhancements to various lines serving
the Richmond District.

The MTA plans to increase peak period frequency of 38-L (from
Financial District to Point Lobos) from 7 to 6 minutes and extend
weekday service hours from 6:45 pm to 9 pm.  The 5-Fulton will increase
frequency in the morning and late afternoon, east of 6th Avenue.  And
the 1AX- California will extend to 6th Avenue, with the 1BX-California
starting near 6th Avenue instead of Park Presidio (where it now starts)
in order to reduce overcrowding on the 1BX.

None of these potential service enhancements, however, seem to
really address the issue of service cutbacks to the outer avenues,
especially during non-peak periods.

When Outer Richmond resident and SFBC Program Director Andy Thornley realized that service on
the 5-Fulton would be reduced past 6th Avenue, he was not pleased. 
Thornley said he had been looking forward to the 5 getting better
through implementation of the MTA’s Transit Effectiveness Project
before the budget crisis hit.  “It’s definitely discouraging to see the
5 get worse” past 6th Avenue, he said.

Other service changes in the Richmond District, according to a link on the MTA website:

  • The 5-Fulton past 6th Avenue will be cut in half during peak periods.
  • The wait time between 31-Balboa buses will go from its current 10 minutes to 12 minutes.
  • The 18-46th Avenue, which currently goes from the Legion of Honor,
    south on 33rd to Geary, and west on Geary past Sutro Heights and the
    Cliff House, will be rerouted to traverse the route that the 38-Ocean
    Beach now travels from 33rd Avenue to the Safeway at La Playa.
  • The 2-Clement will cease to operate past 14th Avenue, and the 4-Sutter will be entirely eliminated.
  • The segment of the 1-California that goes south of Market Street to
    Howard along Main and Beale will be eliminated.  This may not seem
    significant to residents of other parts of the City.  However, without
    light rail or BART, Muni-dependent residents of the Richmond District
    find getting almost anywhere beyond the Financial District
    time-consuming and awkward.  Right now, the 1-California is the only
    bus from the Richmond District that makes it past the Transbay Terminal
    into SoMa.
  • The 29, though not part of the downtown feeder system, will
    cease operation north of Baker Beach.  Riders destined for the Golden
    Gate Bridge or the Presidio Main Post will have to transfer there to the
    PresidiGo, a free shuttle operated by the Presidio Trust.

  • “and the new Fast Passes will no longer be BART-enabled. Richmond residents who take buses downtown and then transfer to BART to go to the Mission District or beyond will now have to pay an extra $10 for a pass that will also work on BART within the City.”

    So can you use it on BART or not? Or does BART-enabled only mean you can add fare to it?

  • 2 passes. The no-BART pass, and the MUNI+SFBART pass which is $10 extra. Used to be zero dollars extra.

  • Oh wow. That I did not know. So it is actually going to be $65 July 1st to get the same MUNI + BART?

    Wasn’t BART allowed to use MUNI ROW in exchange for giving MUNI riders use of BART within SF city limits?

  • I don’t know the history, someone can probably expound on this, but the underground MUNI in SF, is if I understand it, a tunnel that was originally supposed to be for BART – to Marin I assume.

    My understanding is that MUNI pays BART when MUNI riders take BART.

  • Jeffrey W. Baker

    The Muni salary floor was supposed to be used to extract work rule concessions from the operators. Has this happened? I still see N operators leaving the terminal just before Caltrain arrives, three buses leaving the terminal at once, and so forth. I haven’t personally noticed a reduction in missed runs. As far as I can tell, the work rules are as dumb as ever.

  • It’s like Muni/The City is forcing people from the Inner Sunset and westward back into cars! Gavin Fail!

  • For every BART ride made using a FastPass, Muni reimburses BART $1.02. It doesn’t take long for that to start adding up, but it was estimated to be lower than what it would cost Muni to have added additional service on the parallel Mission lines were all those passengers to stop taking BART and switch to Muni.

    With both BART and Muni raising their fares, additional data about where riders are coming from and going to and the service changes that will increase service on Mission Street, that equation has changed.

    Paying nothing is over course a better deal, but $10 is still much less than the $75 it would cost to commute daily each way on BART for one month.

  • What’s the difference between people living on 48th Ave, and people living in Brentwood or Gilroy? Everyone wants more transit options, but some are more cost effective than others. You live far away, so it takes longer to get to places.

  • Barna Mink

    Jeremiah: I’m not sure what you’re arguing for. Doing nothing?

    Also, I would hardly call someone who lives in Richmond or Sunset, “far away”. This is really a tiny city, and the inability to provide efficient transit within the city is something to question.

  • When you list the changes that way, they do seem to have concentrated impacts on the Richmond.

    Viewed more realistically, they’re a combination of cuts (to the 5 and 31) and long-overdue redistribution of service to express lines (38L and 1X). A 17% increase to 38L service, which is already high frequency, is nothing to sneeze at.

    It’s a shame the 28L plan from the TEP isn’t going to happen — that would offer the Richmond new connectivity that might actually change commute patterns.

  • Paul

    BART owns the subway fom Embarcadero to Castro station. The only subway station Muni owns is Forest Hill. So whatever BART wants to do with the subway goes. This is also the reason why MUNI doesn’t start running train service into the subway until BART starts its service.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Riders Feel Railroaded by Caltrain Fare Hikes

|
Public transportation becomes less accessible for low-income Peninsula residents and workers this year with fare increases for both Caltrain and SamTrans buses. Caltrain tickets go up by fifty cents on February 28 while SamTrans bus tickets were raised by 25 cents on January 10. Unlike Muni, neither agency offers discounted tickets to transfer between buses […]

Are Muni Service Woes and Fare Hikes Pushing People to Bikes?

|
Many San Francisco bicyclists got their start by apparently taking this sign’s message to heart. Flickr photo: mattymatt Could rounds of Muni service cuts and fare hikes push more people to start cycling in San Francisco? The MTA, which operates Muni, doesn’t have data on the phenomenon, but anecdotally, it’s already happening. For Christopher Janson, […]

Is the Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project in Jeopardy?

|
Photo: plug1 If the Geary Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project doesn’t get some love from advocates and the general public, the project could be in trouble, according to several people closely following the process. "I look to the left, I look to the right, all I see is opposition and criticism," says Joel Ramos, a […]

BART Will Study Second Transbay Tube, West Side Extension

|
Updated 11:06 p.m. with comments from BART Board-elect Nick Josefowitz. BART says it will formally study the decades-old ideas of building a second Transbay tube and extending service to SF’s western neighborhoods. Ellen Smith, BART’s acting manager for strategic and policy planning, recently told a SF County Transportation Authority Board committee (comprised of SF supervisors) […]